Active Learning: Strategies for Building Students’ Self-Knowledge
Main Article Content
Abstract
This academic article aimed to study on learning management in higher education to present a perspective of learning management that was not just a teacher-centered lecture as it often occued, but also the concepts of active learning management that students were able to develop skills that met the qualification of the 21st century skills and the needs of the current and future labor market. In this article, an active learning management process was presented, starting from meaning, importance, and activity management guidelines that were consistent with active learning management, as well as the example of actual case studies in teaching and learning management. It also discussed the perspective of the active learning management based on constructivist theory and the application of the theories in learning management. The researcher had reviewed some information and concepts from various documents, textbooks, as well as the actual case studies in learning management of Thai language students. The results of the study showed that the active learning management was a practical process in teaching and learning, especially at the higher education level where resources both inside and outside the university were beneficial to learning. Higher education programs were also open to providing learning that enhanced students' core competencies and skills, especially 21st century skills, including learning and innovation skills, information skills, life skills, and career skills. In addition, an important factor in learning management was the factor of students who were ready to learn. At this point, an important role was how teachers design students to be motivated to learn. From the case studies of students, it was found that the students were already attentive and interested. The students were more motivated to learn when teachers design fieldwork that moved from a square classroom to a larger field, they could create their own works. The students were highly motivated to organize their learning, therefore, there was no problem in designing any active learning activities because students had readiness and enjoyed learning. The last important thing that teachers were proud of was that students could build self-knowledge.
Article Details
1. Any views and comments in the article are the authors’ views. The editorial board has not to agree with those views and it is not considered as the editorial board’s responsibility. In case, there is any lawsuit about copyright infringement, it is considered as the authors’ sole responsibility.
2. The article copyright belonging to Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Phetchaburi Rajabhat University are copyrighted legally. Republication must be received direct permission from the authors and Phetchaburi Rajabhat University in written form.
References
กุลิสรา จิตรชญาวณิช. (2562). การจัดการเรียนรู้. กรุงเทพฯ: จุฬาลงกรณ์มหาวิทยาลัย.
ทิศนา แขมมณี. (2552). ศาสตร์การสอน : องค์ความรู้เพื่อการจัดกระบวนการเรียนรู้ที่มีประสิทธิภาพ. (พิมพ์ครั้งที่ 10). กรุงเทพฯ: จุฬาลงกรณ์มหาวิทยาลัย.
วัฒนาพร ระงับทุกข์. (2541). การจัดการสอนที่เน้นผู้เรียนเป็นศูนย์กลาง. กรุงเทพฯ: ต้นอ้อ.
สุมาลี ชัยเจริญ. (2559). การออกแบบการสอน หลักการ ทฤษฎี สู่การปฏิบัติ (พิมพ์ครั้งที่ 2). ขอนแก่น: สาขาเทคโนโลยีการศึกษา คณะศึกษาศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยขอนแก่น.
สุคนธ์ สินธพานนท์ และคณะ. (2562). หลากหลายวิธีสอน…เพื่อพัฒนาคุณภาพเยาวชนไทย. กรุงเทพฯ: ห้างหุ้นส่วนจำกัด 9119 เทคนิคพริ้นติ้ง.
หน่วยศึกษานิเทศก์ สำนักงานคณะกรรมการการศึกษาขั้นพื้นฐาน. (2562). แนวทางการนิเทศเพื่อพัฒนาและส่งเสริมการจัดการเรียนรู้เชิงรุก Active Learning ตามนโยบายลดเวลาเรียนเพิ่มเวลารู้. สืบค้นเมื่อ 20 พฤษภาคม 2566, จาก http://academic.obec.go.th.