Evaluating Factors Influencing Entrepreneurial Intention Among Cross-Cultural Youth in Southeast Asia: A Delphi Method Study
Main Article Content
บทคัดย่อ
This study uses the Delphi method to evaluate and analyse the factors influencing cross-cultural youth entrepreneurial intentions by constructing an evaluation system through literature analysis and expert opinions. The research utilised three iterative rounds of Delphi surveys to engage 12 experts from corporate management, business education, and government sectors in China and Thailand. These experts were selected based on their extensive experience in youth entrepreneurship and policy development. Experts assessed the importance and clarity of various factors, leading to the creation of a validated evaluation framework. In addition to perceived social support, entrepreneurial passion, and entrepreneurial education, other evaluated factors included cultural adaptation, risk tolerance, and access to financial resources. Key findings indicate that perceived social support, entrepreneurial passion, and entrepreneurial education are significantly related to entrepreneurial intentions. Consensus on the importance of these factors was further supported by the steady increase in Kendall's Coefficient of Concordance, a statistical measure indicating expert agreement across the rounds. The results offer actionable insights for policymakers and educators to effectively enhance social support systems, cultivate entrepreneurial passion, and improve educational programs tailored to diverse cultural contexts. These strategies can significantly foster youth entrepreneurship, providing a framework for nurturing entrepreneurial intentions in different cultural settings.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
1. กองบรรณาธิการสงวนสิทธิ์ในการพิจารณาและตัดสินการตีพิมพ์บทความในวารสาร
2. บทความทุกเรื่องจะได้รับการตรวจสอบทางวิชาการโดยผู้ทรงคุณวุฒิ แต่ข้อความและเนื้อหาในบทความที่ตีพิมพ์เป็นความรับผิดชอบของผู้เขียนแต่เพียงผู้เดียว มิใช่ความคิดเห็นและความรับผิดชอบของมหาวิทยาลัยศรีปทุม
3.การคัดลอกอ้างอิงต้องดำเนินการตามการปฏิบัติในหมู่นักวิชาการโดยทั่วไป และสอดคล้องกับกฎหมายที่เกี่ยวข้อง
References
Cardon, M. S., Gregoire, D. A., Stevens, C. E., & Patel, P. C. (2013). Measuring entrepreneurial passion: Conceptual foundations and scale validation. Journal of Business Venturing, 28(3), 373-396.
Grichnik, D., Smeja, A., & Welpe, I. (2010). The importance of being emotional: How do emotions affect entrepreneurial opportunity evaluation and exploitation?. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 76(1), 15-29.
Hossain, M. U., Arefin, M. S., & Yukongdi, V. (2024). Personality traits, social self-efficacy, social support, and social entrepreneurial intention: The moderating role of gender. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 15(1), 119-139.
Ilevbare, F. M., Ilevbare, O. E., Adelowo, C. M., & Oshorenua, F. P. (2022). Social support and risk-taking propensity as predictors of entrepreneurial intention among undergraduates in Nigeria. Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 16(2), 90-107.
Iqbal, S., & Pipon-Young, L. (2009). The Delphi method. Methods, 22(7), 598-601.
Kusmintarti, A. Thoyib, A., Maskie, G., & Ashar, H. (2016). Entrepreneurial characteristics as a mediation of entrepreneurial education influence on entrepreneurial intention. Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 19(1), 24-35.
Kusumojanto, D. D., Wibowo, A., Kustiandi, J., & Narmaditya, B. S. (2021). Do entrepreneurship education and environment promote students' entrepreneurial intention? the role of entrepreneurial attitude. Cogent Education, 8(1), 1-17.
Li, X. (2020). Research on Mechanism and Path of the Impact of Innovation and Entrepreneurship Education on College Students' Entrepreneurial Intention. Thesis of the Degree of Doctoral Program. University of International Business and Economics.
Liao, Y. K., Nguyen, V. H. A., Chi, H. K., & Nguyen, H. H. (2022). Unraveling the direct and indirect effects of entrepreneurial education and mindset on entrepreneurial intention: The moderating role of entrepreneurial passion. Global Business and Organizational Excellence, 41(3), 23-40.
Lin, S., & Ren, Z. (2009). Fuzzy Delphi method and its application. China Science and Technology Forum, 5(1), 102-103.
Liu, X., Zhang, Y., & Fan, L. (2022). Research on the Impact of Perceived Entrepreneurial Obstacles on Entrepreneurial Behavior Tendency:the Moderating Effect of Entrepreneurship Education. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 39(3), 30-39.
Moghtader, L., & Shamloo, M. (2019). The correlation of perceived social support and emotional schemes with students' social anxiety. Journal of Holistic Nursing and Midwifery, 29(2), 106-112.
Neneh, B. N. (2022). Entrepreneurial passion and entrepreneurial intention: the role of social support and entrepreneurial self-efficacy. Studies in Higher Education, 47(3), 587-603.
New Jincheng Research Institute. (2022). The research data on the employment quality of college students from 2020 to 2022. [Online]. Retrieved from: [https://baijiahao. baidu.com/s?id=1731071762329993420
Solesvik, M., Westhead, P., & Matlay, H. (2014). Cultural factors and entrepreneurial intention: The role of entrepreneurship education. Education Training, 56(8/9), 680-696.
Vamvaka, V., Stoforos, C., Palaskas, T., & Botsaris, C. (2020). Attitude toward entrepreneurship, perceived behavioral control, and entrepreneurial intention: dimensionality, structural relationships, and gender differences. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 9(1), 1-26.
Wongpakaran, N., & Wongpakaran, T. (2012). A revised Thai multi-dimensional scale of perceived social support. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 15(3), 1503–1509.
Xu, N., Zhao, D., Zhang, W., Zhang, H., Chen, W., Ji, M., & Liu, M. (2022). Innovation-driven development and urban land low-carbon use efficiency: A policy assessment from China. Land, 11(10), 1634.