THAITESOL Journal https://so05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/thaitesoljournal <p>THAITESOL Journal is a <strong>well-established, semiannual<em>, </em>peer-reviewed</strong> international journal managed by the <strong>Thailand TESOL Organization</strong>. The journal upholds rigorous <strong>academic integrity</strong> through its <strong>strict double-blind peer review process</strong>, ensuring that all published articles meet the highest scholarly standards. The journal serves as a platform for scholars in the field to present their works to those interested. THAITESOL Journal operates as an open-access journal, ensuring that authors and readers incur <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>NO FEES</strong></span> at any stage. It is indexed in <strong>ERIC</strong> and <strong>TCI</strong>.</p> <p><strong>THAITESOL</strong> <strong>Journal</strong> carries more than just a name–it represents a legacy of dedication to English language teaching and research in Thailand and beyond. The all-uppercase <strong>THAITESOL</strong> isn’t just a stylistic choice; it’s a statement of identity, strength, and unwavering commitment to the field of TESOL. As the official publication of the Thailand TESOL Organization, the journal stands as a bridge between scholars, educators, and practitioners, fostering a vibrant academic community where ideas spark, evolve, and inspire. More than just a repository of research, the <strong>THAITESOL Journal</strong> is a home for innovative thinking, a place where language professionals from around the world can share insights, challenge perspectives, and push the boundaries of TESOL/ELT.</p> <h3><strong>Aims and Scope</strong></h3> <p>THAITESOL Journal publishes <strong>English-language</strong> works related to <strong>English language education</strong>, including <strong><em>academic articles, research papers, </em></strong>and<strong><em> book reviews</em></strong>. The journal welcomes contributions from <strong>TESOL scholars</strong>, particularly those addressing the <strong>unique challenges and issues</strong> in <strong>English Language Teaching and Learning</strong>.</p> <p>The journal is especially interested in research and discussions related to <strong>English language education</strong>, covering areas such as:</p> <ul> <li><strong>English language teaching, learning, and assessment</strong></li> <li><strong>English teacher education</strong></li> <li><strong>Intercultural communication</strong></li> <li><strong>Applied linguistics in ELT</strong></li> </ul> <h3><strong>Publication Frequency</strong></h3> <p>THAITESOL Journal is published semiannually.</p> <p> </p> <p><strong>ISSN 2286-8909 (Print)</strong></p> <p><strong>ISSN 2697-4614 (Online)</strong></p> en-US <p><strong>Materials in THAITESOL JOURNAL may be photocopied for educational purposes. Under no circumstances may any part of this journal be photocopied for commercial purposes.</strong></p> thailandtesoljournal@thailandtesol.org (Asst. Prof. Dr. Denchai Prabjandee) thailandtesoljournal@thailandtesol.org (Asst. Prof. Dr. Pariwat Imsa-ard) Tue, 07 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0700 OJS 3.3.0.8 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss 60 Writing-to-Think Learning Logs for Developing Critical Thinking in L2 Discussion Classes https://so05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/thaitesoljournal/article/view/284241 <p>This study investigates how <em>writing-to-think learning logs</em> can support the development and articulation of critical thinking (CT) in Japanese university L2 discussion courses. <em>Writing-to-think</em> is conceptualized as using writing not only to record but to generate and clarify reasoning, and is integrated with <em>CT-infused </em>instruction, which explicitly teaches reasoning and evaluation within language learning tasks. Implemented over one academic year with CEFR A2–B1 learners (analytic sample: <em>n</em> = 24 from a larger cohort of <em>N </em>= 79), the study employed three recurring log tasks—<em>opinion expression (OE)</em>, <em>text summarization (TS)</em>, and <em>evaluation of viewpoints (EV)</em>—that prompted students to articulate reasoning in writing before and after class discussions. A sequential explanatory mixed-methods design was adopted. Quantitatively, rubric-based ratings of learning-log entries (focus, logic, and content) were analyzed across three time points (Sessions 2, 9, and 16). Results showed significant improvement in OE and EV, with larger gains observed in EV, while TS remained stable. Qualitatively, thematic analysis of representative students’ entries revealed four developmental patterns: a shift from fragmented to coherent reasoning, growth in evaluative thinking, more relevant examples, and continued difficulty distinguishing reasons from examples. Overall, CT growth was observed in association with the integration of explicit reasoning demands and iterative writing cycles that slowed and structured thinking, making reasoning visible and open to reflection. Learning logs thus functioned as both scaffold and research artifact, offering a practical means to make CT teachable and traceable in L2 discussion classrooms.</p> Megumi Uemi Copyright (c) 2026 Megumi Uemi https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0 https://so05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/thaitesoljournal/article/view/284241 Tue, 07 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0700 Integrating Task-Based Learning and Total Physical Response to Develop Listening Comprehension among Primary School EFL Learners in Thailand https://so05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/thaitesoljournal/article/view/285300 <p>This quasi-experimental study evaluated the effectiveness of integrating Task-Based Learning (TBL) with Total Physical Response (TPR) to improve listening comprehension among Thai Primary 6 EFL learners. Sixty students aged 11–12 from a primary school under the Nonthaburi Primary Educational Service Area Office 1 were assigned to an experimental (<em>n</em> = 30) or a control (<em>n</em> = 30) group using cluster sampling. The experimental group received 6 hours of integrated TBL-TPR instruction, whereas the control group received conventional Presentation–Practice–Production (PPP) instruction. Listening comprehension was assessed using a validated test (KR-20 = 0.72; IOC = 1.00) at pre-test and post-test. The experimental group demonstrated significant gains, with a 30.2% increase in listening scores (<em>p </em>&lt; .05) and outperformed the control group by a mean difference of 1.83 points (15.1% relative to the control group’s post-test mean; <em>d </em>= 1.21; <em>p</em> &lt; .05). The control group also demonstrated significant within-group improvement (15.6%), though the magnitude was substantially smaller than the experimental group. The findings indicate that TBL-TPR integration effectively enhances listening comprehension by leveraging motor-based learning, reducing affective barriers, and facilitating authentic communication. This study provides one of the few controlled empirical investigations into the synergistic effects of integrating TBL and TPR on listening comprehension in primary EFL contexts characterized by limited exposure to the target language and elevated language anxiety.</p> Sermsak Srasri, Saiphin Siharak, Jean Claire Morales Copyright (c) 2026 Sermsak Srasri, Saiphin Siharak, Jean Claire Morales https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0 https://so05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/thaitesoljournal/article/view/285300 Wed, 15 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0700