การออกแบบโครงสร้างของการประเมินองค์ประกอบสำคัญ ในการถ่ายทอดเทคโนโลยี ในบริบทประเทศไทย
คำสำคัญ:
การประเมินเทคโนโลยี, การถ่ายทอดเทคโนโลยี, ระดับความพร้อมของเทคโนโลยี, การใช้ประโยชน์เชิงพาณิชย์บทคัดย่อ
This research aimed to develop a new evaluation framework of technology transfer (EFTT), which is a new comprehensive cross-industry assessment framework, to evaluate key elements in technology transference in Thailand. This study used an in-depth interview approach, with an expert panel, to discover key success factors of technology transference, together with the analysis of "Cloverleaf Model of Technology Transfer" and the TRL assessment method from the Sandia National Laboratories (SNL) and the European Association of Research and Technology Organizations (EARTO). The discussions led to the design of EFTT with two main constructs. First is the technological construct, which consisted of two components as follows: 1.1) the implementation of knowledge/technology in the research, and 1.2) the ability to use the product from the research. Second is the business element construct, which consisted of four components as follows: 2.1) the consistency of research output and user needs, 2.2) marketing, 2.3) technology transfer management, and 2.4) intellectual property protection. EFTT matrix categorized the technology readiness into 6 stages, 9 levels, and 56 assessment issues. Eventually, the project administrators/supervisors could adopt the EFTT matrix to monitor the technology transfer progress and define any delays or bottlenecks in their research processes.
เอกสารอ้างอิง
Chirazi, Jacques, et al. (2019). What do we learn from good practices of biologically inspired design in innovation?. Applied Sciences, 9(4),
pp. 1-16.
EARTO. (2014). The TRL scale as a research & innovation policy tool, EARTO recommendations (Online). Available: https://www.earto.eu/wp-
content/uploads/The_TRL_Scale_as_a_R_I_ Policy_Tool_-_EARTO_Recommendations_-_Final.pdf [2020, November 4].
Fernandez, Joseph A. (2010). Contextual role of TRLs and MRLs in technology management (Online). Available:
https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Contextual-role-of-TRLs- and-MRLs-in-technology-
Fernandez/c0653db22ea824bd3348b589c2c2f251a385ba5e [2020, November 5].
Heslop, Louise A., McGregor, E., & Griffith, M. (2001). Development of a technology readiness assessment measure: The cloverleaf model of
technology transfer. Journal of Technology Transfer, 26(4), pp. 369–384.
Kalayou, Mulugeta Hayelom, Endehabtu, Berhanu Fikadie, & Tilahun, Binyam. (2020). The applicability of the modified technology acceptance
model (TAM) on the sustainable adoption of ehealth systems in resource-limited settings. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, 13,
pp. 1827–1837.
Kam-Fai, Michael TSUI. (2020). Commercialization of rehabilitation robotics in Hong Kong (Online). Available:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ B9780128149423000155?via%3Dihub [2020, November 4].
Mitchell, John A. (2007). Measuring the maturity of a technology: Guidance on assigning a TRL (Online). Available:
https://cfwebprod.sandia.gov/cfdocs/CompResearch/docs/TRL-Guidance-final.pdf [2020, November 4].
Mohannak, Kavoos, & Samtani, Laxman. (2014). A criteria-based approach for evaluating innovation commercialisation (Online). Available:
https://conference.druid.dk/acc_papers/i1xk9l9pli4 jnefryvacrvpjdy22.pdf [2020, November 4].
Samtani, Laxman Ashok. (2010). Technology transfer evaluation in the high technology industry: An interdisciplinary perspective. Doctorial
Dissertation of Philsophy, School of manangment, Faculty of Bussiness, Queensland University of Technology, Australia.
Sharabi, Moshe. (2015). Customer focus. In S. M. Dahlgaard-Park (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Quality and the Service Economy (pp. 114-118).
New York, NY: SAGE.
Sung, Tae Kyung, & Gibson, David V. (2005). Knowledge and technology transfer grid: Empirical assessment. International Journal of
Technology Management, 29(3–4), pp. 216-230.
Wahab, Sazali Abdul, et al. (2009). A review on the technology transfer models, knowledge-based and organizational learning models on
technology transfer. European Journal of Social Sciences, 10(4), pp. 550-564.
ดาวน์โหลด
เผยแพร่แล้ว
ฉบับ
ประเภทบทความ
สัญญาอนุญาต

อนุญาตภายใต้เงื่อนไข Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
บทความทุกบทความเป็นลิขสิทธิ์ของวารสารวิชาการศรีปทุม ชลบุรี