THE EFFECTIVENESS ESSENTIALS OF CONSUMER PRODUCT LIABILITY LAW ENFORCEMENT

Main Article Content

พิชัย พ้นภัย

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to study key factors in the enforcement of product liability laws and crucial factors in their enforcement efficiency for consumer protection purposes. The effective study method of quantitative research is employed by questionnaire on lawyers practicing in Greater Bangkok and its perimeter; the data analysis program, LISREL, is applied to find crucial factors in the law enforcement efficiency. And the reliable study method of qualitative research is used by documentary research and in-depth interviews conducted with key informant contributing specialists. As a result, the findings are: (1) the consumer protection fairness depends on consumers entitled to damage remedy, manufacturers’ awareness of their product liability, and on consumers’ direct litigation. (2) The manufacturers are realize of their product liability depends on the remedy entitlement and consumers’ direct litigation. (3) The remedy entitlement relies on consumers’ direct litigation. In the law enforcement efficiency, the most crucial factor is manufacturers’ realization of their product liability; the fact is newly found in the light of good governance and corporate governance which favors the law enforcement efficiency dependent on the social responsibility assumed by business organizations. The main proposal for this research places a high priority on the origin of manufacture. If the same is proper, good benefits at consumer’s end will be gained, so the law enforcement efficiency could be attained.

Article Details

How to Cite
พ้นภัย พ. (2018). THE EFFECTIVENESS ESSENTIALS OF CONSUMER PRODUCT LIABILITY LAW ENFORCEMENT. Sripatum Review of Humanities and Social Sciences, 12(2), 148–158. Retrieved from https://so05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/spurhs/article/view/117209
Section
บทความวิจัย

References

คำพิพากษาฎีกาที่ 131/2496. เหตุใกล้ชิดกับผล.
คำพิพากษาฎีกาที่ 1358-1369/2506. เหตุใกล้ชิดกับผล.
คำพิพากษาฎีกาที่ 5751/2544. ค่าเสียหายทางด้านจิตใจ.
ประจักษ์ พุทธิสมบัติ. 2530. ประมวลกฎหมายแพ่งและพาณิชย์ลักษณะละเมิดและจัดการงานนอกสั่ง. กรุงเทพฯ: บริษัทศรีสมบัติการพิมพ์จำกัด.ประมวลกฎหมายแพ่งและพาณิชย์มาตรา 446.

“ซีเอสอาร์ (CSR) ธุรกิจเพื่อสังคมพลังเปลี่ยนแปลงโลก งาน 31 ปีประชาชาติธุรกิจ.” (2550 พฤษภาคม 28). มติชน. หน้า 33.

สถาบันไทยพัฒน์. 2550. “CSR-บรรษัทบริบาล องค์กรต้องเก่งและดี.

Aginam, O. 2006. “Between life and profit.” North Carolina journal of international law and commercial regulation. 31, 901-921.

Alexander Hawes LLP. 2010. “Defective product specialists.” Retrieved August 20, 2010.

Bowman and Brooke LLP. 1999. “International Product Liability Laws.” Retrieved January 25, 2006.

Brainmass. 2011. “Strict liability theory.” Retrieved February 10, 2011.

Clerk, J., & Lindsell, W. 1982. Torts. London : Sweet and Maxwell Ltd.

Emanuel, S.L. 1984. Torts. NY. Emauel Law Outlines.

Epstein, A.R. 1973. “Introduction of tort.” Retrieved February 10, 2011.

Gale, W.E. 2006. “Product liability.” Retrieved April 12, 2007.

Harper, V. 1940. A treatises on the law of tort. Indianapolis :The Bobbes-Merrill Company Publishers.

Jie, X. 2010. “PRC Tort liability law helps protect human rights.” Retrieved February 10, 2011.

Kotler, P., & Lee, N. 2005. Corporate social responsibility, doing the most good for your company and your cause. N.J.: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Larson, A. 2003. “Product Liability Law–Protecting consumers from Defective Products.” Retrieved January 6, 2006.

Lee, J. 2005. “Manufacturer product liability: Duty to warn.” Retrieved December 14, 2005.

Mason, B.W. 2004. “Product Liability Law in Japan.” Retrieved February 6, 2006.

Monheit, H, Silverman, L.T., & Fodera, L.V. 2001. “Are the condom you use safe and free from defect?.” Retrieved January 28, 2001.

Morrow, M. 1994. “Technology issues and product liability.” Retrieved November 2, 2006.

N.A.W. 2007. “Product liability.” Retrieved April 12, 2007.

Osso, D.D. 2002 “Avoiding the `misuse'' defense in products cases.” Retrieved August 26, 2010.

Owen, D.G. 1996. “Defectiveness Restated: Exploding the “Strict” Products Liability Myt.”. Retrieved November 20, 2005 .

Owen, D.G., Montgomery, J.E., & Keeton, W.P. 1997. Products liability and safety cases and materials third edition. NY:The foundation press, INC.

Pliszka, & Butler. 2006. “Legal larceny or just desserts: Punitive damages-recent developments.” Retrieved March 4, 2009 .

Pollick, M. 2007. “What is product liability.” Retrieved April 5, 2007 .

Prosser, W.L. 1971. Law of torts. 4th ed. St.Paul, Minn: West Publishing Co.

Stearns, D.W. 2001. “An introduction to product liability law.” Retrieved December 11, 2006 .

Times 100 Edition. 2011. “Consumer protection. “Retrieved October 15, 2011 .

United Nations. 2002. “Human rights principles and responsibilities for transnational corporations and other business enterprises.” Retrieved February 2, 2007.

Wilczynski, D.S. 2005. “Product liability in the United States.” Retrieved November 11, 2005.