Aquatic Eutrophication Potential of Fertilizer Application in Maize Cultivation in Thailand
Main Article Content
Abstract
Eutrophication is one of the challengeable global environmental problems driven by excessive nutrients (nitrogen and phosphorus) released to the ecosystem from various sources, mainly from fertilizer application in agricultural production systems. The life cycle assessment framework was applied to assess aquatic eutrophication potential associated with fertilizers applied in maize production in Thailand. The emissions were quantified by applying widely used updated inventory models, Product Environmental Footprint Category Rules (PEFCR) and European Monitoring and Evaluation Program/European Environmental Agency (EMEP/EEA) (2019). The characterization factors were obtained from the characterization model, IMPACT World+. Based on the midpoint level analysis, the total marine eutrophication potential from fertilizers applied in maize cultivation in 2019 was 26,514,965 kg N N-lim equivalent, while the total freshwater eutrophication potential was 50,175 kg PO43- P-lim equivalent. The highest marine and freshwater eutrophication potentials were from Phetchabun province, while the lowest from Surin province. Nitrate emission has the highest contribution to the marine eutrophication potential at regional, provincial and country levels, followed by ammonia and nitrogen dioxide emissions. The only emission that contributes to the freshwater eutrophication potential in this study was phosphorous. The northern region has the highest contribution to the highest marine and freshwater eutrophication potentials. The results of damage level impact assessment revealed that the ecosystem damage from aquatic eutrophication potential is greater in the northern region and lower in the central region. The ecosystem damage from marine and freshwater eutrophication potentials was 331,800,510 PDF. m2. year with the high contribution (99.8%) of marine eutrophication potential. Phetchabun was the highly contributed province to the ecosystem damage while the lowest was Surin province. These results shall be useful for the policymakers and researchers to develop the regulations to initiate emission reduction plans. The analysis of emission reduction pathways found that the 4R (right source, right rate, right time and right place) nutrient management practice would be the best and effective way to reduce the eutrophication impacts on the environment in the context of Thailand compared to the other three approaches; changing fertilizer types, fertilizer spreading techniques and the use of inhibitors/soluble salts.
Article Details
References
Saelee, W. 2017. Environmental efficiency analysis of Thai rice farming (Doctoral dissertation, University of Reading). Available from: http://centaur.reading.ac.uk/75742/1/20026115_Waraporn_thesis.pdf (accessed 20 November 2020).
Huang, J., Xu, C. C., Ridoutt, B. G., Wang, X. C., & Ren, P. A. 2017. Nitrogen and phosphorus losses and eutrophication potential associated with fertilizer application to cropland in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 159, 171-179.
Bouwman, A. F., Beusen, A. H., & Billen, G. 2009. Human alteration of the global nitrogen and phosphorus soil balances for the period 1970-2050. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 23(4).
Khan, M. N., & Mohammad, F. 2014. Eutrophication: challenges and solutions. In Eutrophication: Causes, consequences and control. Springer, Dordrecht, 1-15.
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 2020. FAOSTAT: Crops 1960 2015. Available from: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC/visualize (accessed 20 December 2020)
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 2020. FAOSTAT: Fertilizer by nutrient 1960-2017. Available from: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/RFN/visualize (accessed 20 December 2020)
Tirado, R., Englande, A. J., Promakasikorn, L., & Novotny, V. 2008. Use of Agrochemicals in Thailand and its Consequences for the Environment. Greenpeace Research Laboratories. Technical Note 03/2008. Available from: http://www.greenpeace.to/publications/GPSEA_agrochemical-use-in-thailand.pdf (accessed 20 December 2020)
Ibisch, R., Austnes, K., Borchardt, D. et al., 2016. European assessment of eutrophication abatement measures across land-based sources, inland, coastal and marine waters. European Environment Agency: Copenhagen, Denmark, 7-9.
Henderson, A. D. 2015. Eutrophication. Life cycle impact assessment. LCA Compendium - The Complete World of Life Cycle Assessment, Springer, Dordrecht, 177-196.
Peerapornpisal, Y., & Pekkoh, J. Diversity, phylogenic criteria and cyanotoxins of toxic blue-green algae in Thailand. At 10th BRT Annual Conference, Krabi, Thailand on October 8-11, 2006.
Cheevaporn, V., & Menasveta, P. 2003. Water pollution and habitat degradation in the Gulf of Thailand. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 47(1-6): 43-51.
Chantara, S., Chansribut, W., & Sitthichaiwong, W. Relationship of amount of toxic blue-green algae to water quality in Mae Kuang reservoir, Chiang Mai. At 28th Congress on science and technology of Thailand, Bangkok, Thailand on October 24-26, 2002.
Sala, S., Reale, F., Cristobal-Garcia, J., Marelli, L., & Pant, R. 2016. Life cycle assessment for the impact assessment of policies. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.
Ekasingh, B., Gypmantasiri, P., Thong-ngam, K., & Grudloyma, P. 2004. Maize in Thailand: production systems, constraints, and research priorities. Mexico, D.F.: CIMMYT.
Pongpat, P., Gheewala, S. H., & Silalertruksa, T. 2017. An assessment of harvesting practices of sugarcane in the central region of Thailand. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 1138-1147.
Silalertruksa, T., Gheewala, S. H., Pongpat, P., Kaenchan, P., Permpool, N., Lecksiwilai, N., & Mungkung, R. 2017. Environmental sustainability of oil palm cultivation in different regions of Thailand: greenhouse gases and water use impact. Journal of Cleaner Production, 167, 1009-1019.
Pingmuanglek, P. 2016. An analysis of alternatives for sustainable management of cassava and its related products for the future sustainability of food and biofuels. University of Phayao, Phayao, Thailand.
Yodkhum, S., Sampattagul, S., & Gheewala, S. H. 2018. Energy and environmental impact analysis of rice cultivation and straw management in northern Thailand. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25(18), 17654-17664.
Khonpikul, S. 2016. Material flow cost accounting of maize supply chain in Thailand for improve eco-efficiency. University of Phayao, Phayao, Thailand.
Khonpikul, S., Jakrawatana, N., Sangkaew, P., & Gheewala, S. H. 2017. Resource use and improvement strategy analysis of the livestock and feed production supply chain in Thailand. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 22(11), 1692-1704.
Khonpikul, S., Jakrawatana, N., Sangkaew, P., Gheewala, S.H., Mungkalasiri, J., & Janrungautai, J. 2017. Material Flow Analysis of Maize Supply Chain in Thailand, Journal of Sustainable Energy & Environment 8: 87-89.
Khonpikul, S., Jakrawatana, N., Sangkaew, P. & Gheewala, S.H. 2015. Economically Extended-Material Flow Analysis of Maize Supply Chain in Thailand. 5th International Conference on Green and Sustainable Innovation (ICGSI) 8-10 Nov, 2015.
ISO 14040: 2006. 2006a. Environmental Management - Life Cycle Assessment Principles and Framework. International Organization for Standardization (ISO), Geneva.
Office of Agriculture Economics. 2021. Thailand Foreign Agricultural Statistics 2019. Available from: http://www.oae.go.th/assets/portals/1/ebookcategory/28_yearbook-2562/#page=1 (accessed 10 February 2021).
EMEP/EEA. 2019. European Monitoring and Evaluation Program/European Environmental Agency. 3-D Crop production and agricultural soils. Available from: https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/emep-eea-guidebook-2019/part-b-sectoral-guidance-chapters/4-agriculture/3-d-crop-production-and/view (accessed 10 June 2021).
Zampori, L., & Pant, R. 2019. Suggestions for updating the Product Environmental Footprint (PEF) method. Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg.
Bulle, C., Margni, M., Patouillard, L. et al., 2019. IMPACT World+: a globally regionalized life cycle impact assessment method. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 24(9), 1653-1674.
Hauschild M, Goedkoop M, Guinee J. et al., 2011. Recommendations for life cycle impact assessment in the European context - based on existing environmental impact assessment models and factors (International Reference Life Cycle Data System - ILCD handbook). Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.
Misselbrook, T., Bittman, S., Cordovil, C. et al., 2019. Field application of organic and inorganic fertilizers and manure. In Draft section for a Guidance Document, Task Force on Reactive Nitrogen under the UNECE Air Convention, with support from the European Commission, Brussels. 30-09.
Department of Environment Food and Rural Affairs. 2020. Code of good agriculture practices (COGAP) for reducing ammonia. Available from: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/
uploads/attachment_data/file/729646/code-good-agricultural-practice-ammonia.pdf (accessed 5 September 2020).
Wang, H., Köbke, S., & Dittert, K. 2020. Use of urease and nitrification inhibitors to reduce gaseous nitrogen emissions from fertilizers containing ammonium nitrate and urea. Global Ecology and Conservation, 22, e00933.
Choudhury, A. T. M. A., & Kennedy, I. R. 2005. Nitrogen fertilizer losses from rice soils and control of environmental pollution problems. Communications in soil science and plant analysis, 36(11-12), 1625-1639.
Skiba, U., Fowler, D., & Smith, K. A. 1997. Nitric oxide emissions from agricultural soils in temperate and tropical climates: sources, controls and mitigation options. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 48(1): 139-153.
McTaggart, I., Clayton, H., & Smith, K. 1994. Nitrous oxide flux from fertilized grassland: strategies for reducing emissions. In Non-CO2 Greenhouse Gases: Why and How to Control. Springer, Dordrecht, 421-426.
Froment, M. A., Chalmers, A.G. & Smith, K. A. 1992. Nitrate leaching from autumn and winter application of animal manures to grassland. Aspects Appl. Biol. 30: 153-156.
Roberts, T. L., & Johnston, A. E. 2015. Phosphorus use efficiency and management in agriculture. Resources, conservation and recycling, 105, 275-281.
Eagle, A. J., Christianson, L. E., Cook, R. L., Harmel, R. D., Miguez, F. E., Qian, S. S., & Ruiz Diaz, D. A. 2017. Meta‐analysis constrained by data: Recommendations to improve relevance of nutrient management research. Agronomy Journal, 109(6), 2441-2449.
Quemada, M., Baranski, M., Nobel-de Lange, M. N. J., Vallejo, A., & Cooper, J. M. 2013. Meta-analysis of strategies to control nitrate leaching in irrigated agricultural systems and their effects on crop yield. Agriculture, ecosystems & environment, 174, 1-10.
Office of Agriculture Economics. 2020. Quantity and value of chemical fertilizer import. Available from: www.oae.go.th/view/1/ปัจจัยการผลิต/TH-TH (accessed 7 March 2021).
HIS Market. 2021. Nitrates Fertilizer Market and Price Analysis. Available from: https://agribusiness.ihsmarkit.com/sectors/fertilizers/nitrates.html (accessed 7 March 2021).
The fertilizer institute. 2021. 4R nutrient stewardship. Available from: https://nutrientstewardship.org/4rs/ (acc accessed 2 April 2021).
Reetz, H. F., Heffer, P., & Bruulsema, T. W. 2015. 4R nutrient stewardship: A global framework for sustainable fertilizer management. Managing Water and Fertilizer for Sustainable Agricultural Intensification, 65-86.