Life Cycle Assessment of Plant-Based Milk Incorporating Functional Ingredients

Main Article Content

Panusorn Hunsub
Kamonthip Nilmat
Nut Thephuttee
Pitchaya Pothinuch
Tarit Apisittiwong
Nattapong Prichapan

Abstract

As a sustainable source, the plant-based product has gained popularity in the food industry over the last decade. This study adopted a life cycle assessment (LCA) to evaluate the environmental impacts and identify critical points of plant-based milk incorporating functional ingredients, addressing the existing gap in understanding their incorporation from an environmental perspective. The cradle-to-gate analysis encompassed raw material acquisition, including the agricultural stage, functional ingredient procurement, processing-stage resource consumption (emission, water, steam, and electricity), and waste treatment in manufacturing. Six investigated scenarios were formed by combining three types of plant-based milk (soybean, rice, and pea) with two sources of additional alternative protein (pea protein concentrate and insect powder), mangosteen peel extract as antioxidant, and fructo-oligosaccharide (FOS) as dietary fiber, defining 1 L of milk without packaging as a functional unit (FU). The modeling was conducted using Simapro software 9.0, and the assessment was implemented via the IMPACT 2002+ method. The results showed that pea milk had a lower environmental impact in 8 out of 15 categories, followed by rice and soybean milk in 3 and 4 out of 15 categories. The fortification of plant-based milk with FOS should not be utilized in formulation due to the potential for problem shifting and the occurrence of significant adverse environmental impacts. The major hotspot comes from energy consumption in processing and freeze-drying. The adoption of insect powder exhibited a lower impact than pea protein concentrates in carcinogens, non-carcinogens, aquatic ecotoxicity, terrestrial ecotoxicity, land occupation, aquatic eutrophication, and mineral extraction. The results also indicated that producing functional ingredients, especially FOS, generated a substantial environmental impact. Improvement solutions are also discussed. A large amount of generated biowaste from plant-based milk production could be promising feed to insects due to their residue nutritional value. Therefore, the credits of biowaste for the avoided animal feed mitigated the environmental impact. The incorporation of functional ingredients for nutritional fortification in plant-based milk could be assessed through a comprehensive life cycle assessment to prevent problem shifting.

Article Details

Section
Research Articles

References

Grant, C.A. and Hicks, A.L. 2018. Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Milk and Plant-Based Alternatives. Environmental Engineering Science. 35 (11): 1235-1247.

Winans, K.S., Macadam-Somer, I., Kendall, A., Geyer, R. and Marvinney, E. 2020. Life Cycle Assessment of California Unsweetened Almond Milk. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. 25: 577-587.

Zhou, H., Zheng, B., Zhang, Z., Zhang, R., He, L. and McClements, D.J. 2021. Fortification of Plant-Based Milk with Calcium May Reduce Vitamin D Bioaccessibility: An In Vitro Digestion Study. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 69(14): 4223-4233.

Reyes-Jurado, F., Soto-Reyes, N., Dávila-Rodríguez, M., Lorenzo-Leal, A.C., Jiménez-Munguía, M.T., Mani-López, E., and López-Malo, A. 2023. Plant-Based Milk Alternatives: Types, Processes, Benefits, and Characteristics. Food Reviews International. 39(4): 2320-2351.

Chalupa-Krebzdak, S., Long, C.J. and Bohrer, B.M. 2018. Nutrient Density and Nutritional Value of Milk and Plant-Based Milk Alternatives. International Dairy Journal. 87: 84-92.

Vanga, S.K. and Raghavan, V. 2018. How Well Do Plant Based Alternatives Fare Nutritionally Compared to Cow's Milk?. Journal of Food Science and Technology. 55(1): 10-20.

Rahim, M.A., Saeed, F., Khalid, W., Hussain, M. and Anjum, F.M. 2021. Functional and Nutraceutical Properties of Fructooligosaccharides Derivatives: A Review. International Journal of Food Properties. 24(1): 1588-1602.

García, M.L., Carrión, M.H., Escobar, S., Rodríguez, A. and Cortina, J.R. 2021. Optimization of The Antioxidant Capacity of Mangosteen Peels (Garcinia mangostana L.) Extracts: Management of The Drying Extraction Processes. Food Science and Technology International. 27(5): 404-412.

Rizaldy, D., Hartati, R., Nadhifa, T. and Fidrianny, I. 2022. Chemical Compounds and Pharmacological Activities of Mangosteen (Garcinia mangostana L.) - Updated Review. Biointerface Research in Applied Chemistry. 12(2): 2503-2516.

Ge, J., Sun, C., Corke, H., Gul, K., Gan, R. and Fang Y. 2020. The Health Benefits, Functional Properties, Modifications, and Applications of Pea (Pisum sativum L.) Protein: Current Status, Challenges, and Perspectives. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety. 19: 1835-1876.

Quinteros, M.F., Martínez, J., Barrionuevo, A., Rojas, M. and Carrillo, W. 2022. Functional, Antioxidant, and Anti-Inflammatory Properties of Cricket Protein Concentrate (Gryllus assimilis). Biology. 11(5): 776.

De Boer, I.J. 2003. Environmental Impact Assessment of Conventional and Organic Milk Production. Livestock Production Science. 80(1-2): 69-77.

Riofrio, A. and Baykara, H. 2022. Techno‐Environmental and Life Cycle Assessment of ‘Oat-Milk’Production in Ecuador: A Cradle‐to‐Retail Life Cycle Assessment. International Journal of Food Science and Technology. 57(8): 4879-4886.

Khanpit, V., Viswanathan, S. and Hinrichsen, O. 2024. Environmental Impact of Animal Milk Vs Plant-Based Milks: Critical Review. Journal of Cleaner Production. 449: 141703.

Gerbino, E., Quentier, C. and Pénicaud, C. 2022. Dataset on The Life Cycle Assessment of Fructo-and Galacto-Oligosaccharides (FOS and GOS) Produced by Synthesis or Hydrolysis. Data in Brief. 43: 108478.

Rodríguez-Meizoso, I., Castro-Puyana, M., Börjesson, P., Mendiola, J.A., Turner, C. and Ibáñez, E. 2012. Life Cycle Assessment of Green Pilot-Scale Extraction Processes to Obtain Potent Antioxidants from Rosemary Leaves. The Journal of Supercritical Fluids. 72: 205-212.

Nikkhah, A., Van Haute, S., Jovanovic, V., Jung, H., Dewulf, J., Cirkovic Velickovic, T. and Ghnimi, S. 2021. Life Cycle Assessment of Edible Insects (Protaetia brevitarsis seulensis larvae) as A Future Protein and Fat Source. Scientific Reports. 11(1): 14030.

Heusala, H., Sinkko, T., Sözer, N., Hytönen, E., Mogensen, L. and Knudsen, M.T. 2020. Carbon Footprint and Land Use of Oat and Faba Bean Protein Concentrates Using A Life Cycle Assessment Approach. Journal of Cleaner Production. 242: 118376.

Heller, M.C., Keoleian, G.A. and Willett, W.C. 2013. Toward A Life Cycle-Based, Diet-Level Framework for Food Environmental Impact and Nutritional Quality Assessment: A Critical Review. Environmental Science and Technology. 47(22): 12632-12647.