Life Cycle Assessment of Municipal Solid Waste Management Systems in the ASEAN Region: Strategies toward Environmental Sustainability

Main Article Content

Phyo Zaw Oo
Trakarn Prapaspongsa
Jun Ren
Jin Wang
Vladimir Strezov
Nazmul Huda
Shabbir H. Gheewala

Abstract

Rapid urbanisation and consumption patterns shift in the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) has rapidly increased municipal solid waste (MSW) generation, resulting in environmental challenges such as greenhouse gas emissions, resource depletion and public health risks. This study evaluates the life cycle environmental impacts of MSW management systems in ASEAN, focusing on three areas of protection, including human health, ecosystem damage, and resource depletion, and translates these impacts into monetary units. Additionally, the study investigates mitigation potentials through the integration of circular economy policies. The environmental impacts associated with managing one tonne of MSW in ASEAN countries vary across countries, with impacts on human health varying from 6.60 x 10-4 to 19.68 x 10-4 DALYs (Disability Adjusted Life Years), on ecosystem quality ranging from 1.87 x 10-6 to 3.31 x 10-6 species-years, and resource depletion costs between -0.77 and 11.08 USD2013. Total environmental damage costs from managing one tonne of MSW in ASEAN countries range from 199.49 to 434.88 USD2023.  The environmental costs of the MSW management sector in ASEAN countries range from 29 million to 24 billion USD2023 in 2024 and are projected to increase, ranging from 40 million to 28 billion USD2023 in 2030 and from 71 million to 38 billion USD2023 in 2050 if current systems remain unchanged. Indonesia faces the highest environmental costs in the region, due to its substantial MSW generation volume. Singapore is the only country that avoids environmental impacts from its MSW management systems, characterised by high recycling rates, significant energy recovery, and minimal landfilling. Circular economy has the potential to reduce the environmental costs by over 60%. Therefore, comprehensive reforms, including stringent landfill regulations and incentivised recycling practices, are essential to decrease reliance on open dumping and achieve sustainable waste management.

Article Details

Section
Research Articles

References

Jain, A. 2017. Waste Management in ASEAN Countries: Summary Report. Thailand.

Yadav, P. and S.R. Samadder. 2018. A critical review of the life cycle assessment studies on solid waste management in Asian countries. Journal of Cleaner Production. 185: 492-515.

Menikpura, S.N.M., J. Sang-Arun, and M. Bengtsson. 2013. Integrated Solid Waste Management: an approach for enhancing climate co-benefits through resource recovery. Journal of Cleaner Production. 58: 34-42.

Gunamantha, M. and Sarto. 2012. Life cycle assessment of municipal solid waste treatment to energy options: Case study of KARTAMANTUL region, Yogyakarta. Renewable Energy. 41: 277-284.

Rotthong, M., Takaoka, M., Oshita, K., Rachdawong, P., Gheewala, S.H. and Prapaspongsa, T. 2023. Life Cycle Assessment of Integrated Municipal Organic Waste Management Systems in Thailand. Sustainability.

Budihardjo, M.A., Priyambada, I.B., Chegenizadeh, A., Al Qadar, S. And Puspita, A.S. 2023. Environmental impact technology for life cycle assessment in municipal solid waste management. Global Journal of Environmental Science and Management. 9(Special Issue (Eco-Friendly Sustainable Management)): 145-172.

World Bank. 2025. What a Waste Global Database: version 3. [accessed Feb 2025]. https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/search/dataset/0039597.

International Organization for Standardization. 2006. Environmental management - Life cycle assessment - Principles and framework. ISO 14040. Geneva, Switzerland.

International Organization for Standardization. 2006. Environmental management - Life cycle assessment - Requirements and guidelines. ISO 14044. 2006, Geneva, Switzerland.

Vergara, S.E., A. Damgaard, and D. Gomez. 2016. The Efficiency of Informality: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Reductions from Informal Recycling in Bogotá, Colombia. Journal of Industrial Ecology. 20(1): 107-119.

Doka, G. 2023. Calculation manual for LCI calculation tools for regionalised waste treatment: Extended and updated fourth version. Zurich, Switzerland.

Oo, P.Z., Prapaspongsa, T., Ren, J., Wang, J., Strezov, V., Huda, N., Gheewala, S.H. 2025. Electronic supplementary material for: Life Cycle Assessment of Municipal Solid Waste Management Systems in the ASEAN Region: Strategies toward Environmental Sustainability. Mendeley Data. V1, doi: 10.17632/8kmv385892.1.

United Nations Environment Programme. 2015. Global Waste Management Outlook.

ASEAN Secretariat. 2023. Sixth ASEAN State of the Environment Report. Jakarta, ASEAN Secretariat.

Oo, P.Z., Prapaspongsa, T., Strezov, V., Huda, N., Oshita, K., Takaoka, M., Ren, J., Halog, A. and Gheewala, S.H. 2024. The role of global waste management and circular economy towards carbon neutrality. Sustainable Production and Consumption. 52: 498-510.

Doka, G. 2023. Location- and waste-specific life cycle inventories of waste treatment (third update). Doka Life Cycle Assessments, Zurich, Switzerland.

Government Data Catalog. 2024. Local waste collection vehicles, [accessed Aug 2025]. https://gdcatalog.go.th/dataset/?tags=%E0%B8%A3%E0%B8%96%E0%B8%82%E0%B8%A2%E0%B8%B0

Asian Development Bank. 2023. Southeast Asia Urban Services Facility: Feasibility Study for Lao People’s Democratic Republic - Urban Environment Improvement Investment Project (Luang Prabang).

Asian Development Bank. 2003. Metro Manila Solid Waste Management Project (TA 3848-PHI), REPORT No: 4 - Waste Disposal.

United Nations Environment Programme. 2024. Global sulphur campaign: Global diesel fuel sulphur levels. [accessed Feb 2025]. https://www.unep.org/topics/transport/partnership-clean-fuels-and-vehicles/global-sulphur-campaign.

European Environment Agency. 2023. EMEP/EEA air pollutant emission inventory guidebook 2023. Technical guidance to prepare national emission inventories.

Doka, G. 2003. Life Cycle Inventories of Waste Treatment Services. ecoinvent report No. 13. Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories: Dübendorf.

Ecoinvent. 2023. Ecoinvent version 3.10. https://support.ecoinvent.org/ecoinvent-version-3.10.

PRé Sustainability. 2024. SimaPro [Software], Version 9.6.0.1. https://network.simapro.com/pre/.

Huijbregts, M.A.J., Steinmann, Z.J.N., Elshout, P.M.F., Stam, G., Verones, F., Vieira, M., Zijp, M., Hollander, A. And van Zelm, R. 2017. ReCiPe2016: a harmonised life cycle impact assessment method at midpoint and endpoint level. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. 22(2): 138-147.

Weidema, B. 2009. Using the budget constraint to monetise impact assessment results. Ecological Economics. 68: 1591-1598.

World Bank. 2025. Inflation, GDP deflator (annual %). [accessed May 2025]. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.DEFL.KD.ZG.

Kaza, S., Yao, L.C., Bhada-Tata, P. and Van Woerden, F. 2018. What a Waste 2.0: A Global Snapshot of Solid Waste Management to 2050. Urban Development. © Washington, DC: World Bank.

International Energy Agency. 2023. World Energy Outlook 2023.

Smolders, E. and F. Degryse. 2002. Fate and Effect of Zinc from Tire Debris in Soil. Environmental Science & Technology. 36(17): 3706-3710.

Wik, A. 2007. Toxic components leaching from tire rubber. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 79(1): 114-9.

Prashant, P., Kevin, C.C., Chiang Yong, C., Yang, J., Kit Yee, L., Wen Yan Ivan, L., Leilei, L., Yoki, O., Eunmi, P. and Junjie, S. 2024. Chapter 3. Implications of US Dollar Reliance in ASEAN+3, in ASEAN+3 Financial Stability Report 2024. ASEAN+3 Macroeconomic Research Office (AMRO): Singapore.

Circle Economy. 2025. The Circularity Gap Report 2025. Circle Economy: Amsterdam.

Calderón Márquez, A.J., Cassettari Filho, P.C., Rutkowski, E.W. and de Lima Isaac, R. 2019. Landfill mining as a strategic tool towards global sustainable development. Journal of Cleaner Production. 226: 1102-1115.