Logistics Efficiency Improvement and Waste Reduction using the Appropriate Forecasting Techniques Analysis for Hospital Pharmaceutical Demand Forecasting Error Reduction

Main Article Content

Chatpon Mongkalig

Abstract

Effective waste management is guided by the 7R framework (Refuse, Reduce, Reuse, Repair, Repurpose, Recycle, and Recover). This study emphasizes the first two most important principles (Refuse and Reduce) by improving pharmaceutical demand forecasting to reduce waste and enhance logistics efficiency. The objective of this research was to analyze the appropriate forecasting techniques for the case study hospital important pharmaceutical demand forecasting error reduction. Using ABC analysis, 219 products were classified, with Group A items (70.95% of total inventory value) selected for analysis. These were further categorized into cyclical/seasonal demand (31 SKUs) and demand without seasonality (188 SKUs). Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) was applied in the Design of Experiments (DOE) using the Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and multiple comparisons test for the appropriate forecasting techniques analysis in order to reduce the important pharmaceutical demand forecasting error. The forecasting technique was the main factor and Mean Absolute Deviation (MAD) served as the response variable. According to the class A cyclical/seasonal demand pharmaceutical products, the most appropriate forecasting technique was the 12-month seasonal length Winters’ method. The average of MAD obtained by the yearly seasonal length Winters’ method decreased by 7.04 units per month comparing to the 3-month moving average which was the current forecasting method because of the seasonality of pharmaceutical demand. For the class A drugs without seasonality, the most appropriate forecasting technique was single exponential smoothing. The MAD of single exponential smoothing decreased by 38.47 units per month comparing to the 3-month moving average which was the as-is forecasting method of the case study hospital. It can be concluded that Winters’ method with 12-month seasonal length was suitable for cyclical/seasonal demand drugs, reducing MAD by 11% compared to the traditional 3-month moving average. For pharmaceutical demand without seasonality, single exponential smoothing was the most appropriate forecasting method, reducing MAD by 17.5%. The findings demonstrated that selecting appropriate forecasting methods could significantly improve logistics efficiency, reduce pharmaceutical waste, and enhance hospital supply chain performance.

Article Details

Section
Research Articles

References

Jestratijevic, I., Maystorovich, I. and Vrabič-Brodnjak, U. 2022. The 7 Rs sustainable packaging framework: systematic review of sustainable packaging solutions in the apparel and footwear industry. Sustainable Production and Consumption. 30(8): 331-340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.12.013

Borah, S.J. and Kumar, V. 2024. Integrated Waste Management. Springer, New York.

Merkuryeva, G., Valberga, A. and Smirnov, A. 2019. Demand forecasting in pharmaceutical supply chains: A case study. Procedia Computer Science. 149: 3-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.01.100

Rathipriya, R., Abdul Rahman, A.A., Dhamodharavadhani, S., Meero, A. and Yoganandan, G. 2023. Demand forecasting model for time-series pharmaceutical data using shallow and deep neural network model. Neural Computing & Applications, 35: 1945-1957. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-022-07889-9

Christopher, M. 2016. Logistics & supply chain management (5th ed.). Pearson, London.

Apriyanti, M.E. 2023. Government strategy to recover the tourism sector affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research. 4(1): 90-106. http://dx.doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber. 04.01.11

Kumar, P. and Ekka, P. 2024. Statistical analysis of the impacts of COVID‑19 pandemic on the small and large‑scale tourism sectors in developing countries. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 26: 9625-9659. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03112-4

Montgomery, D.C. 2019. Design and Analysis of Experiments (10th ed.). John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York.

Asilahijani, H., Steiner, S.H. and MacKay, R.J. 2010. Reducing variation in an existing process with robust parameter design. Quality Engineering. 22: 30-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08982110903381889

Goos, P. and Jones, B. 2011. Optimal Design of Experiments: A Case Study Approach. John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York.

Yu, P., Low, M.Y. and Zhou, W. 2018. Design of experiments and regression modelling in food flavour and sensory analysis: A review. Trends in Food Science & Technology. 71: 202-215. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2017.11.013

Schlueter, A. and Geyer, P. 2018. Linking BIM and Design of Experiments to balance architectural and technical design factors for energy performance. Automation in Construction. 86: 33-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2017.10.021

Gössling, S., Scott, D., and Hall, C.M. 2020. Pandemics, tourism and global change: A rapid assessment of COVID-19. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 29(1): 1-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2020.1758708

Box, G.E.P., Jenkins, G.M., Reinsel, G.C. and Ljung, G.M. 2015. Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control (5th ed.). John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York.

Makridakis, S.G., Wheelwright, S.C. and Hyndman, R.J. 1998. Forecasting: Methods and Applications. John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York.

Dean, A., Voss, D. and Draguljic, D. 2017. Design and Analysis of Experiments (2nd ed.). Springer, New York.

Montgomery, D.C. 2019. Introduction to Statistical Quality Control (6th ed.). John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York.

Montgomery, D.C. and Runger, G.C. 2014. Applied Statistics and Probability for Engineers (6th ed.). John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York.