Systemic Value of Functional Based Clusters and Strategic Environmental Assessment Framework in Integrated River Basin Master Planning

Main Article Content

Thodsapol Chatulabul
Nudnicha Pongput

Abstract

This article explores the systemic value of integrating the Function-Based Clusters (FBCs) and Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) framework into Thailand’s river basin master planning. The FBC–SEA approach combines functional zoning (F1–F6 with sub-zoning) with strategic assessment processes, thereby linking spatial logic with systemic analysis. The study highlights five key dimensions of water management: domestic water supply, productive and economic uses, water-related disasters, water quality and environment, and governance and management. Drawing from empirical studies on risk mapping, SEA implementation, and participatory water governance, the analysis demonstrates that FBC–SEA enhances upstream–downstream causal reasoning, strengthens participatory governance through functional-zone forums, improves climate resilience by facilitating scenario development, and provides measurable outputs such as policy maps, indicators, and dashboards. Furthermore, risk maps superimposed on FBC zones identify vulnerable areas and enable spatial prioritization to achieve equity across urban, agricultural, and marginalized communities. In contrast, conventional SEA applied without spatial-functional integration tends to remain fragmented and less effective in capturing systemic relationships and more oriented toward short-term measures. The study concludes that adopting the FBC–SEA framework in full can transform river basin master plans into living plans that are transparent, adaptive, and aligned with global agendas such as the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and the Paris Agreement.

Article Details

Section
Research Articles

References

Global Water Partnership (GWP). 2000. Integrated Water Resources Management. TAC Background Paper No. 4. Stockholm, Sweden: Global Water Partnership.

Vannote, R.L., Minshall, G.W., Cummins, K.W., Sedell, J.R. and Cushing, C.E. 1980. The river continuum concept. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences. 37(1): 130-137.

Allan, J.D. 2004. Landscapes and riverscapes: The influence of land use on stream ecosystems. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics. 35(1): 257-284.

Postel, S. and Richter, B.D. 2003. Rivers for life: Managing water for people and nature. Washington, DC: Island Press. 220 p.

Maskong, H., Jothityangkoon, C. and Hirunteeyakul, C. 2019. Flood hazard mapping using on-site surveyed flood map, HEC-RAS V.5 and GIS tool: A case study of Nakhon Ratchasima Municipality, Thailand. International Journal of GEOMATE. 16(54): 1-8.

Singto, C., et al. 2018. Bottom-up and top-down practices in Southern Thailand: Participatory water resource development. Water. 10(6): 781.

Srisuwan, A. 2024. Urban water security in multidisciplinary practices: A case of Lamphun Municipality, Thailand. Journal of Urban Management. 13(3): 456-468.

Garshasbi, D., et al. 2024. Assessment of future urban flood risk of Bangkok Metropolitan at the district level. Environmental Advances. 15: 100521.

Kittiprapas, S. and Daniere, A. 2025. Community engagement in water management to enhance sustainability: A case study of Bangkachao, Thailand. Local Development & Society. 6(1): 1-32.

Gopalan, S.P., et al. 2022. Potential impact of diversion canals and retention areas as adaptation measures in the Chao Phraya River Basin, Thailand. Science of the Total Environment. 838: 156522.

Ruangpan, L., et al. 2024. Economic assessment of nature-based solutions to reduce flood risk. Journal of Environmental Management. 360: 12162.