Water-Saving Green Roofs for Pollinators
Main Article Content
Abstract
Appropriately designed green roofs can function as water-saving irrigation systems and pollinator habitats. In this study, we evaluated a rooftop irrigation system using reclaimed water (simulated by diluted seawater up to 18 dS m⁻¹) to sustain vegetation (turf grass Cynodon dactylon and the Crassulacean acid metabolism [CAM] species Sedum kamtschaticum and S. oryzifolium) under drought and salinity stress. A stress factor, the time integral of the soil water potential that exceeds a threshold for normal growth, was used to quantify the accumulated plant stress. Moderate stress reduced total evapotranspiration but increased water use efficiency in CAM plants, indicating trade-offs between irrigation frequency and plant water use. Saline irrigation led to cation accumulation in leaves (Na⁺, Ca²⁺, Mg²⁺, and K⁺). Additionally, leaf extract electrical conductivity [ECleaf] was more reliable for assessing plant salt stress than drainage water electrical conductivity. However, ECleaf is not an absolute stress detector. Rather, it is a relative indicator that requires species-specific calibration. These findings support an integrated design framework that balances substrate properties, plant selection, climate conditions, and irrigation scheduling. Key recommendations include prioritizing drought- and salt-tolerant species (especially CAM plants) to reduce water demand, optimizing irrigation intervals to mitigate stress, and adopting renewable energy for automated irrigation. Integrating pollinator-friendly planting with efficient reclaimed water reuse can enhance the sustainability and resilience of green roof ecosystems. However, pollinator-habitat benefits remain theoretical. This demonstrates the need for direct field validation of flowering and visitation responses.
Article Details
References
Sanchez, M. and Wang, D. 2020. Carrying the ball: A portrait of leadership in urban rooftop agriculture. Journal of Living Architecture. 7(1): 1-26.
Goulson, D., Lye, G.C. and Darvill, B. 2008. Decline and conservation of bumble bees. Annual Review of Entomology. 53: 191-208. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ento.53.103106.093454.
Hennig, E.I. and Ghazoul, J. 2012. Pollinating animals in the urban environment. Urban Ecosystems. 15: 149-166. DOI: 10.1007/s11252-011-0202-7.
Kratschmer, S., Kriechbaum, M. and Pachinger, B. 2018. Buzzing on top: Linking wild bee diversity, abundance and traits with green roof qualities. Urban Ecosystems. 21: 429-446. DOI: 10.1007/s11252-017-0726-6.
Hofmann, M.M. and Renner, S.S. 2018. Bee species recorded between 1992 and 2017 from green roofs in Asia, Europe, and North America, with key characteristics and open research questions. Apidologie. 49: 307-313. DOI: 10.1007/s13592-017-0555-x.
Sponsler, D.B. and Bratman, E.Z. 2021. Beekeeping in, of or for the city? A socioecological perspective on urban apiculture. People and Nature. 3(3): 550-559. DOI: 10.1002/pan3.10206.
Castaño-Quintana, K., Montoya-Lerma, J. and Valencia-Pizo, E. 2023. Soil salinization and chemically mediated plant–insect interactions in a changing climate. Current Opinion in Insect Science. 59: 101082.
Razzaghmanesh, M. and Beecham, S. 2014. The hydrological behaviour of extensive and intensive green roofs in a dry climate. Science of the Total Environment. 499: 284-296.
Friedler, E. and Hadari, M. 2006. Economic feasibility of on-site reclaimed water reuse in multi-storey buildings. Desalination. 190(1-3): 221-234. DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2005.10.007.
Ichinari, T., Ohtsubo, A., Ozawa, T., et al. 2008. Wastewater treatment performance and sludge reduction properties of a household wastewater treatment system combined with an aerobic sludge digestion unit. Process Biochemistry. 43(7): 722-728. DOI: 10.1016/j.procbio.2008.02.016.
Williams, N.S.G., Rayner, J.P. and Raynor, K.J. 2010. Green roofs for a wide brown land: Opportunities and barriers for rooftop greening in Australia. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 9(3): 245-251. DOI: 10.1016/j.ufug.2010.01.005.
Ayers, R.S. and Westcot, D.W. 1985. Water quality for agriculture. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 29, FAO, Rome, pp. 141.
Letey, J., Hoffman, G.J., Hopmans, J.W., Grattan, S.R., Suarez, D., Corwin, D.L., Oster, J.D., Wu, L. and Amrhein, C. 2011. Evaluation of soil salinity leaching requirement guidelines. Agricultural Water Management. 98(4): 502-506. DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2010.08.009.
Moritani, S., Yamamoto, T., Andry, H., Inoue, M., Kato, K. and Saito, H. 2013. Effect of combined water and salinity stress factors on evapotranspiration of Sedum kamtschaticum Fischer in relation to green roof irrigation. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 12(3): 338-343. DOI: 10.1016/j.ufug.2013.04.005.
Agra, H.E., Solodar, A., Bawab, O., et al. 2018. Comparing reclaimed water versus tap water and coal ash versus perlite on growth of two plant species on green roofs. Science of the Total Environment. 633: 1272-1279. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.291.
Van Mechelen, C., Dutoit, T. and Hermy, M. 2015. Adapting green roof irrigation practices for a sustainable future: A review. Sustainable Cities and Society. 19: 74-90. DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2015.07.007.
Smith, R.J. and Hancock, N.H. 1986. Leaching requirement of irrigated soils. Agricultural Water Management. 11(1): 13-22. DOI: 10.1016/0378-3774(86)90032-6.
Allen, R.G., Pereira, L.S., Raes, D., and Smith, M. 1998. Crop evapotranspiration: Guidelines for computing crop water requirements. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 56, FAO, Rome, pp. 300.
Hameed, M. and Ashraf, M. 2008. Physiological and biochemical adaptations of Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers. from the Salt Range (Pakistan) to salinity stress. Flora. 203(8): 683-694. DOI: 10.1016/j.flora.2007.11.005.
Kluge, M. 1977. Is Sedum acre L. a CAM plant? Oecologia. 29: 77-83. DOI: 10.1007/BF00345364.
Black, C.C. 1973. Photosynthetic carbon fixation in relation to net CO2 uptake. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology. 24: 253-286.
Gravatt, D.A. and Martin, C.E. 1992. Comparative ecophysiology of five species of Sedum (Crassulaceae) under well-watered and drought-stressed conditions. Oecologia. 92: 532-541. DOI: 10.1007/BF00317845.
Moritani S., Yamamoto T., Andry H. and Saito H. 2017. Evapotranspiration and mineral content of Sedum kamtschaticum Fischer under saline irrigation. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis. 48(12): 1399-1408. DOI: 10.1080/00103624.2017.1358743.
Marcum, K.B. 2006. Use of saline and non-potable water in the turfgrass industry: Constraints and developments. Agricultural Water Management. 80(1-3): 132-146. DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2005.07.009.
Earnshaw, M.J., Carver, K.A. and Lee J.A. 1985. Changes in leaf water potential and CAM in Sempervivum montanum and Sedum album in response to water availability in the field. Oecologia. 67: 486-492. DOI:10.1007/BF00790018.
Munns, R. 2005. Genes and salt tolerance: Bringing them together. New Phytologist. 167(3):645-663. DOI: 10.1111/nph.2005.167.issue-3.
Descamps, C., Quinet, M. and Jacquemart, A.-L. 2021. Climate change–induced stress reduce quantity and alter composition of nectar and pollen from a bee-pollinated species. Frontiers in Plant Science. 12: 755843. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2021.755843.
Larcher, W. 2003. Physiological Plant Physiology (4th edition). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, pp. 513.
Maathuis, F.J.M. and Amtmann A. 1999. K+ nutrition and Na+ toxicity: The basis of cellular K+/Na+ ratios. Annals of Botany. 84(2):123-133. DOI: 10.1006/anbo.1999.0912.