Assessment of Pollutant Dispersion in Emergency Scenarios at an Oil Terminal: A Case Study Using the ALOHA Model
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study assesses pollutant dispersion and associated safety impacts resulting from kerosene leakage at oil terminal facilities located in Bangkok and Samut Prakan, Thailand, using the ALOHA (Areal Locations of Hazardous Atmospheres) software to simulate vapor dispersion and fire scenarios. The assessment focused on evaluating the hazard distances of the Flammable Area of Vapor Cloud, Toxic Threat Zone, and Thermal Radiation from Pool Fire under different meteorological conditions. A total of ten simulation scenarios were simulated, consisting of seven scenarios in Bangkok (Scenario 1.1–1.7) and three scenarios in Samut Prakan (Scenario 2.1–2.3).
The results suggest that the flammable vapor cloud area remained relatively constant across all scenarios, hazard distances of approximately 22 m in Bangkok and 23 m in Samut Prakan. This finding suggests that kerosene has a low evaporation rate, causing the flammable vapor cloud to remain confined near the leakage source within the bund wall area and to be minimally influenced by meteorological conditions.
For the Toxic Threat Zone, Samut Prakan exhibited significantly greater impact distances than Bangkok. The AEGL-1 distances ranged from 55–60 m and AEGL-2 distances ranged from 24–26 m in Samut Prakan, whereas Bangkok showed AEGL-1 distances of 33–37 m and AEGL-2 distances of 22–23 m. These differences may be explained by the larger fuel storage capacity, larger tank dimensions, and greater containment areas in Samut Prakan, which may have promoted higher evaporation and vapor accumulation in the atmosphere.
The assessment of Thermal Radiation from Pool Fire revealed substantially larger impact distances in Samut Prakan compared with Bangkok. Thermal radiation distances at 10 kW/m² were approximately 95–96 m in Samut Prakan and 63–64 m in Bangkok. At 5 kW/m², the distances were approximately 134–135 m in Samut Prakan and 90–91 m in Bangkok, while at 2 kW/m², the distances were approximately 208–210 m in Samut Prakan and 140–142 m in Bangkok. These results suggest that Thermal Radiation from Pool Fire may represents the most extensive hazard compared with the Flammable Area of Vapor Cloud and Toxic Threat Zone.
Overall, Samut Prakan exhibited greater hazard distances for all parameters than Bangkok, which may be associated with its larger storage tanks, greater fuel inventory, and larger containment areas, potentially resulting in larger fuel puddles and higher vapor generation. The findings also suggest that the dispersion behavior of kerosene in this study may resemble quasi-heavy gas behavior which may cause vapor clouds to accumulate near ground level and generate hazards primarily within the near-field region close to the leakage source. In contrast, the dominant hazard associated with the incident was Thermal Radiation from Pool Fire, which produced the widest impact area.
Article Details
References
Center for Chemical Process Safety. 2000. Guidelines for Chemical Process Quantitative Risk Analysis (2nd Edition). American Institute of Chemical Engineers, New York.
Yoksahachart, K. 2016. Application of ALOHA Program for Impact and Risk Assessment of Toxic Gas Leakage and Emergency Prevention Measures: A Case Study of Chlorine Gas in Cooling Tower Water Production Process. Master's Thesis. Department of Safety Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Tseng, J.M., Su, T.S., Chu, C.R. and Lin, M.C. 2012. Consequence evaluation of toxic chemical releases by ALOHA. Procedia Engineering. 45: 384-389.
Permnam, S. 2021. Assessment of Dispersion and Explosion of Naphtha Solvent from Large Storage Tanks Using the ALOHA Model and Evacuation Simulation Using the Pathfinder Model. Master's Thesis. Department of Safety Engineering and Environmental Management, Faculty of Engineering at Sriracha, Kasetsart University, Chonburi, Thailand.
Patel, P. and Sohani, N. 2015. Hazard evaluation using ALOHA tool in storage area of an oil refinery. International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology. 4(5): 107-111.
Parent, G., Erez, G., Collin, A., Suzanne, M., Thiry-Muller, A., Weber, M., Faure, E. and Boulet, P. 2019. Spectral radiation emitted by kerosene pool fires. Fire Safety Journal. 108:102847.
Mišić, N., Zigar, D., Božilov, A. and Pešić, D. 2018. Calculation of thermal radiation level during a pool fire caused by leakage of kerosene from tanker wagon at railway crossings. Transactions of the VSB – Technical University of Ostrava, Safety Engineering Series. 13(1): 29-36.
Dertli, H. and Saloglu, D. 2021. Vinyl acetate emission rates and explosions in tank farms in Dilovasi and Yumurtalik, Turkey: A case study. International Journal of Safety and Security Engineering. 11(6): 691-696.
Bhattacharya, R. and Kumar, V.G. 2021. Consequence analysis for simulation of hazardous chemicals release using ALOHA software. International Journal of Safety and Security Engineering. 11(6): 691-696.
Thai Meteorological Department. 2024. Meteorological data for the period 2020-2024. Thai Meteorological Department, Thailand.
Chevron Products Company. 2020. Aviation turbine jet fuel safety data sheet. Chevron Products Company, San Ramon, CA.
Exxon Mobil Corporation. 2022. ExxonMobil Jet Fuel. Exxon Mobil Corporation, Spring, TX.
Keesee, C.L., Guo, B. and Petersen, E.L. 2021. Laminar flame speed measurements of kerosene-based fuels accounting for uncertainties in mixture average molecular weight. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power. 143(4): 041009.
National Research Council. 2011. Acute exposure guideline levels for selected airborne chemicals: Volume 10. National Academies Press, Washington, DC.
United States Environmental Protection Agency. 2024. Jet fuels (JP-5 and JP-8) results: AEGL program. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
New Jersey Department of Health. 2016. Kerosene hazardous substance fact sheet. New Jersey Department of Health, Trenton, NJ.
Faith, L.E., Ackerman, G.H. and Henderson, H.T. 1971. Heat Sink Capability of Jet A Fuel: Heat Transfer and Coking Studies. NASA CR-72951. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Cleveland, OH.
Ministry of Energy. 2013. Ministerial Regulation on Oil Depots B.E. 2556. Ministry of Energy, Bangkok, Thailand.
National Fire Protection Association. 2024. NFPA 11: Standard for Low-, Medium-, and High-Expansion Foam. National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA.
Hanna, S.R., Chang, J.C. and Strimaitis, D.G. 1993. Hazardous gas model evaluation with field observations. Atmospheric Environment. 27A(15): 2265–2285.
Airports Authority of India. 2020. Risk Assessment and Hazard Analysis for Vijayawada Airport Expansion Project. Airports Authority of India, New Delhi, India.
Jones, R., Lehr, W., Simecek-Beatty, D. and Reynolds, R. 2013. ALOHA (Areal Locations of Hazardous Atmospheres) 5.4.4 Technical Documentation. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
Mannan, S. 2012. Lees' Loss Prevention in the Process Industries: Hazard Identification, Assessment and Control (4th Edition). Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford.
Hanna, S.R., Briggs, G.A., and Hosker, R.P. 1982. Handbook on Atmospheric Diffusion. U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, DC.
Casal, J. 2018. Evaluation of the Effects and Consequences of Major Accidents in Industrial Plants (2nd Edition). Elsevier, Amsterdam.