Diversity of Thai Craftsman Communities in Rattanakosin Island
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article employs qualitative research methods, combining documentary research with fieldwork through in-depth interviews and non-participant observation. Historical methodology and folklore studies serve as key interpretive tools to present the dynamic social transformation of Thai artisan communities in the Rattanakosin Island area. The research is guided by two main objectives: first, to study the characteristics and social development of Thai artisan communities in the Rattanakosin Island area within the context of contemporary society; and second, to analyze the dynamic factors influencing the existence and transformation of these communities in 2023–2024. The research findings reveal that the Thai artisan communities in Rattanakosin Island reflect the social dynamics of skilled labor groups who have been integrated into both traditional and modern Thai social structures. In early Rattanakosin, artisan communities were systematically organized within the capital city area, both for residential and functional purposes, supporting the production and transmission of artisanal knowledge. Over time, these communities evolved into more commercialized professional systems. However, as the physical space and social landscape of Rattanakosin Island changed due to social and cultural developments, many artisan communities either adapted or declined. Some groups were absorbed into modern lifestyles under the influence of four dynamic factors: the economy, urban management, political policies, and consumer behavior.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The content within the published articles, including images and tables, is copyrighted by Rajamangala University of Technology Rattanakosin. Any use of the article's content, text, ideas, images, or tables for commercial purposes in various formats requires permission from the journal's editorial board.
Rajamangala University of Technology Rattanakosin permits the use and dissemination of article files under the condition that proper attribution to the journal is provided and the content is not used for commercial purposes.
The opinions and views expressed in the articles are solely those of the respective authors and are not associated with Rajamangala University of Technology Rattanakosin or other faculty members in the university. The authors bear full responsibility for the content of their articles, including any errors, and are responsible for the content and editorial review. The editorial board is not responsible for the content or views expressed in the articles.
References
บุญมา คงเมือง. (2548). การเปลี่ยนแปลงของอาชีพช่างในเขตเมืองเก่า: กรณีศึกษาชุมชนบ้านบาตร.สถาบันไทยคดีศึกษา.
พิเศษ เจียจันทร์พงษ์. (2550). ระบบช่างหลวงและการควบคุมแรงงานฝีมือในรัฐไทยสมัยต้นรัตนโกสินทร์. วารสารประวัติศาสตร์ไทย, 26(1), 13–42.
ศวิตา นัยพัฒน์. 2564. การเปลี่ยนแปลงทางสังคมและวัฒนธรรมของชุมชนริมน้าจันทบูร อำเภอเมือง จังหวัดจันทบุรี (วิทยานิพนธ์ปริญญามหาบัณฑิต). มหาวิทยาลัยศิลปากร.
ศูนย์มานุษยวิทยาสิรินธร (องค์การมหาชน). (2560). งานหัตถกรรมพื้นบ้านไทยกับเศรษฐกิจสร้างสรรค์. ศมส.
Coser, L. A. (1977). Masters of sociological thought: Ideas in historical and social context. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Nisbet, R. (1969). Social change and history: Aspect of the western theory of development. Oxford University Press.
Pandey, M. T. (2021). Modernization, industrialization and urbanization. In Rethinking development (pp. BSOG-173 Block 2 (Theorizing development) pages: 51-60). IGNOU.