IMPROVING THE ORDER STATUS TRACKING PROCESS IN THE PURCHASING DEPARTMENT: A CASE STUDY OF AN ENGINE MANUFACTURING COMPANY

Authors

  • Kanokwan Sakunsongdej Logistics and Supply Chain Management, School of Logistics and Supply Chain, Sripatum University-Chonburi Campus
  • Pattarakan Kumjadpai Logistics and Supply Chain Management, School of Logistics and Supply Chain, Sripatum University-Chonburi Campus

Keywords:

process improvement, ECRS, order status checking

Abstract

This research aims to: 1) study and analyze the problems of the product order status checking process in the purchasing department of an engine manufacturing company, and 2) improve the product order status checking process in the purchasing department of an engine manufacturing company. The study focuses on reducing data search time and enhancing service efficiency for internal customers. The research employed a case study methodology through work observation, employee interviews, and time measurement of 10 sample purchase orders over a 3-month period. The study identified key problems: internal customers cannot independently check order status and must always inquire with purchasing staff. Each staff member has different data recording methods, resulting in time-consuming data searches and complex work processes. The main causes stem from lack of standardized data storage and inefficient tracking systems. The researcher applied ECRS principles (Eliminate, Combine, Rearrange, Simplify) to analyze and improve work processes by eliminating unnecessary steps, combining related procedures, and rearranging sequences appropriately, along with developing process flow charts to visualize the improvements. Research results showed that before process improvement, checking order status took an average of 160.77 minutes per item (total 1,607.7 minutes for 10 items). After improvement, it took an average of 131.37 minutes per item (total 1,313.7 minutes for 10 items), reducing operation time by 29.4 minutes per item, representing an 18.29% improvement with statistical significance. This improvement not only reduced working time for purchasing staff but also enhanced satisfaction of internal customers who can now receive order status information more quickly and accurately. The research findings can be applied to other organizations with similar operational characteristics.

Author Biographies

Kanokwan Sakunsongdej, Logistics and Supply Chain Management, School of Logistics and Supply Chain, Sripatum University-Chonburi Campus

Logistics and Supply Chain Management, School of Logistics and Supply Chain, Sripatum University-Chonburi Campus

Pattarakan Kumjadpai, Logistics and Supply Chain Management, School of Logistics and Supply Chain, Sripatum University-Chonburi Campus

Logistics and Supply Chain Management, School of Logistics and Supply Chain, Sripatum University-Chonburi Campus

References

กนกวรรณ สกุลทรงเดช, ภาลิณี ผกาวัน และธนวัฒน์ เพิ่มพูน. (2566). การปรับปรุงกระบวนการจัดการเอกสารของแผนกซ่อมบำรุงเครื่องจักร กรณีศึกษา บริษัทผลิตชิ้นส่วนอิเล็กทรอนิกส์. วารสารสหศาสตร์ศรีปทุม ชลบุรี, 9(3), หน้า 64-83.

วนิดา สิงห์น้อย. (2564, 5 สิงหาคม). E-Office สำนักงานอิเล็กทรอนิกส์ ผู้ช่วยทำงานในยุค 4.0 (ออนไลน์). เข้าถึงได้จาก: https://www.scimath.org/article-technology/item/12413-e-office-4-0 [2567, 10 มิถุนายน].

ศิรัตน์ แจ้งรักษ์สกุล, คุณากร วิวัฒนากรวงศ์ และวริศ ลิ้มลาวัลย์. (2567). การปรับปรุงกระบวนการทำงานของแผนกจัดซื้อในบริษัทค้าปลีก. วารสารวิทยาการจัดการ มหาวิทยาลัยราชภัฏอุดรธานี, 6(3), หน้า 26-35.

Barnes, D. (2018). Operations management: An international perspective. London: Bloomsbury.

Benton, W.C., & McHenry, L.F. (2020). Purchasing and supply chain management. London: Sage.

Blanchard, D. (2021). Supply chain management best practices. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.

Chopra, S., & Meindl, P. (2001). Strategy, planning, and operation. Supply Chain Management, 15(5), pp. 71-85.

Christopher, M. (2016). Logistics and supply chain management. London: Pearson.

Guerra, S. (2024, July 23). How predicting delivery delays increases customer satisfaction in e-commerce (Online). Available: https://www.sendcloud.com/predicting-delivery-delays-customer-satisfaction/ [2025, June 10].

Hammer, M., & Champy, J. (2009). Reengineering the corporation: Manifesto for business revolution. Michigan: Zondervan.

Inbound Logistics. (2023, December). Supply chain monitoring: What it is, why it matters (Online). Available: https://www.inboundlogistics.com/articles/supply-chain-monitoring/ [2025, June 9].

Kumar, R. (2019). Research methodology: A step-by-step guide for beginners (5th ed.). London: Sage.

Nisa, A.K., Hisjam, M., & Helmi, S.A. (2021). Improvement of work method with eliminate, combine, re-arrange, and simplify (ECRS) concept in a manufacturing company: A case study (Online). Available: https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1757-899X/1096/1/012016 [2025, August 2].

Pintuma, S., Khaengkhan, M., Waiyawuththanapoom, P., & Aunyawong, W. (2020). Moderating effect of information sharing on the relationship of supply chain management capabilities and business performance: A study of the food industry. International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 9(2), pp. 341-351.

Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2019). Research methods for business students (8th ed.). Harlow, England: Pearson Education.

Tirastittam, P, Jermsittiparsert, K., Waiyawuththanapoom, P., & Aunyawong, W. (2020). Strategic leadership, organizational innovativeness and the firm supply performance: The mediating role of information technology capability. International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 9(2), pp. 291-299.

Wisedsin, T., Jermsittiparsert, K., Thitrat, P., & Aunyawong, W. (2020). Role of advanced manufacturing technology, human capital and employee empowerment to enhance manufacturing industry supply chain performance. International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 9(2), pp. 411-418.

Womack, J. P., & Jones, D. T. (2003). Lean thinking: Banish waste and create wealth in your corporation. New York: Simon & Schuster.

Downloads

Published

2025-10-14

Issue

Section

บทความวิจัย