How can Informal Discursive Arenas Complement Deliberative Policy Analysis?

Authors

  • Noe John Joseph E. Sacramento School of Public Policy, Chiang Mai University, Thailand

Keywords:

deliberative, democratic, informal arena, participatory, policymaking

Abstract

Policy arenas are essential elements since these are context and impact variables to the deliberative policymaking process. This article attempts to elucidate the informal discursive policy arena less explored by deliberative scholars. Using qualitative research methods and meta-analysis, the study documented research and provided inputs on the basic question of how the informal discursive arena complements deliberative policy analysis (DPA). To unpack informal discursive is essential to DPA, specifically on its richness, complexity, and diversity that offers new perspectives in the systems, mechanisms, and processes of the conventional DPA. While the informal arena is surrounded by diverse and marginalized groups focusing on interest-based complex issues, it will likely genuinely address the aim for the inclusive representation of policy actors, citizenry, and stakeholders by obliterating formal barriers. Lastly, the study layout lessons from the Global South to support the claim and provide potential research directions to informal arenas vis-à-vis DPA.

References

Bächtiger, A., Dryzek, J. S., Mansbridge, J., & Warren, M. E. (2018). The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy. Oxford University Press.

Barnes, M., Newman, J., & Sullivan, H. (2006). Discursive arenas: Deliberation and the constitution of identity in public participation at a local level. Social Movement Studies, 5(3), 193-207.

Bartels, K. P. R., Greenwood, D. J., & Wittmayer, J. M. (2020). How action research can make deliberative policy analysis more transformative. Policy Studies, 41(4), 392-410.

Böker, M. (2017). Justification, critique and deliberative legitimacy: The limits of mini-publics. Contemporary Political Theory, 16(1), 19-40.

Boossabong, P., & Chamchong, P. (2019). The practice of deliberative policy analysis in the context of political and cultural challenges: Lessons from Thailand. Policy Studies, 40(5), 476-491.

Borg, R., & Paloniemi, R. (2012). Deliberation in cooperative networks for forest conservation. Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences, 9(3), 151-166.

Burgess, J., Stirling, A., Clark, J., Davies, G., Eames, M., Staley, K., & Williamson, S. (2007). Deliberative mapping: A novel analytic-deliberative methodology to support contested science-policy decisions. Public Understanding of Science, 16(3), 299–322.

Button, M., & Mattson, K. (1999). Deliberative democracy in practice: Challenges and prospects for civic deliberation. Polity, 31(4), 609–637.

Carpini, M. X. D., Cook, F. L., & Jacobs, L. R. (2004). Public deliberation, discursive participation, and citizen engagement: A Review of the Empirical Literature. Annual Review of Political Science, 7(1), 315–344.

Celia, D., Margaret, W., & Barnett, E. (2006). Citizens at the Centre: Deliberative Participation in Healthcare Decisions. Policy Press.

Chamchong, P. (2020). How cultural and organizational conditions impact on policy entrepreneurship: Evidence from Thailand. Journal of Asian Public Policy, 13(1), 79–93.

Connelly, S., Richardson, T., & Miles, T. (2006). Situated legitimacy: Deliberative arenas and the new rural governance. Journal of Rural Studies, 22(3), 267–277.

DeLeon, P. (1992). The democratization of the policy sciences. Public Administration Review, 52(2), 125–129.

DeLeon, P., & Varda, D. M. (2009). Toward a theory of collaborative policy networks: Identifying structural tendencies. Policy Studies Journal, 37(1), 59–74.

Dodge, J. (2014). Civil society organizations and deliberative policy making: Interpreting environmental controversies in the deliberative system. Policy Sciences, 47(2), 161–185.

Dore, J. (2014). An agenda for deliberative water governance arenas in the Mekong. Water Policy, 16(S2), 194–214.

Dryzek, J. S. (2001). Legitimacy and economy in deliberative democracy. Political Theory, 29(5), 651–669.

Dryzek, J. S. (2002). Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations. Oxford University Press.

Durnova, A., Fischer, F., & Zittoun, P. (2016). Discursive approaches to public policy: Politics, argumentation, and deliberation. In Peters, B. G., & Zittoun, P. (Ed.). Contemporary Approaches to Public Policy.

Durnova, A., & Zittoun, P. (2013). Discursive approaches to public policy. Revue Francaise de Science Politique, 63(3), 569–577.

Edelenbos, J., & Van Meerkerk, I. (2016). Vitality in interactive governance: Conditions and challenges. In Margerum, R. D., & Robinson, C. J. (Eds.). The Challenges of Collaboration in Environmental Governance. Edward Elgar Publishing.

Einsiedel, E. F. (2008). Public participation and dialogue. In Bucchi, M., & Trench, B. (Ed.). Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology. Routledge.

Esau, K., Fleuß, D., & Nienhaus, S. M. (2021). Different arenas, different deliberative quality? Using a systemic framework to evaluate online deliberation on immigration policy in Germany. Policy & Internet, 13(1), 86–112.

Fischer, F. (1992). Response: Reconstructing policy analysis: A postpositivist perspective. Policy Sciences, 25(3), 333–339.

Fischer, F. (2003). Reframing Public Policy: Discursive Politics and Deliberative Practices. Oxford University Press.

Fischer, F. (2007). Policy analysis in critical perspective: The epistemics of discursive practices. Critical Policy Studies, 1(1), 97–109.

Fischer, F. (2015). In pursuit of usable knowledge: Critical policy analysis and the argumentative turn. In Fisher, F., Torgerson, D., Durnová, A., & Orsini, M. (Ed.). Handbook of Critical Policy Studies. Edward Edgar Publishing.

Fischer, F., & Boossabong, P. (2018,). Deliberative policy analysis. In Bächtiger, A., Dryzek, J. S., Mansbridge, J., &Warren, M. (Ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy.

Fischer, F., & Forester, J. (1993). The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning. Duke University Press.

Fischer, F., & Gottweis, H. (2012). The argumentative turn revisited: Public policy as communicative practice. In Fishcer, F., & Gottweis, H. (Ed.). The Argumentative Turn Revisited. Duke University Press.

Fishkin, J. S. (2003). Consulting the public through deliberative polling. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 22(1), 128–133.

Flitcroft, K., Gillespie, J., Salkeld, G., Carter, S., & Trevena, L. (2011). Getting evidence into policy: The need for deliberative strategies? Social Science & Medicine, 72(7), 1039–1046.

Forester, J. (1999). The Deliberative Practitioner: Encouraging Participatory Planning Processes. MIT Press.

Forester, J. (2013). On the theory and practice of critical pragmatism: Deliberative practice and creative negotiations. Planning Theory, 12(1), 5–22.

Forester, J., Kuitenbrouwer, M., & Laws, D. (2019). Enacting reflective and deliberative practices in action research. Policy Studies, 40(5), 456–475.

Fraser, N. (2021). Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy. In Mitrašinović, M., & Mehta, V. (Ed.). Public Space Reader. Routledge.

Fuchs, D., & Kalfagianni, A. (2009). Discursive power as a source of legitimation in food retail governance. The International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research, 19(5), 553–570.

Gale, T. (1999). Policy Trajectories: Treading the discursive path of policy analysis. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 20(3), 393–407.

Gerston, L. N. (2014). Public Policy Making: Process and Principles. 3rd ed. Routledge.

Gregory, J., Watson, R., & Hartz-Karp, J. (2008). Using deliberative techniques to engage the community in policy development. Australia and New Zealand Health Policy, 5(1).

Gutmann, A., & Thompson, D. F. (2009). Why deliberative democracy? In Gutmann, A., & Thompson, D. F. (Ed.). Why Deliberative Democracy? Princeton University Press.

Hajer, M. A., & Wagenaar, H. (2003). Deliberative Policy Analysis: Understanding Governance in the Network Society. Cambridge University Press.

Hastings, A. (1998). Connecting linguistic structures and social practices: A discursive approach to social policy analysis. Journal of Social Policy, 27(2), 191–211.

Hendriks, C. M. (2005). Participatory storylines and their influence on deliberative forums. Policy Sciences, 38(1), 1–20.

Hendriks, C. M. (2006a). Integrated deliberation: Reconciling civil society’s dual role in deliberative democracy. Political Studies, 54(3), 486–508.

Hendriks, C. M. (2006b). When the forum meets interest politics: Strategic uses of public deliberation. Politics & Society, 34(4), 571–602.

Hendriks, C. M., & Grin, J. (2007). Contextualizing reflexive governance: The politics of Dutch transitions to sustainability. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 9(3–4), 333–350.

Hopkins, D. (2010). Planning a city through ‘dialogue’: Deliberative policymaking in action in Western Australia. Urban Policy and Research, 28(3), 261–276.

Hoppe, R. (2011). Institutional constraints and practical problems in deliberative and participatory policy making. Policy & Politics, 39(2), 163–186.

Innes, J. E., & Booher, D. E. (2004). Reframing public participation: Strategies for the 21st century. Planning Theory & Practice, 5(4), 419–436.

Larrea, M., & Arrona, A. (2019). Improving the approach to conflict in action research through deliberative policy analysis: A territorial development case in the Basque Country. Policy Studies, 40(5), 492–509.

Li, Y. (2015). Think tank 2.0 for deliberative policy analysis. Policy Sciences, 48(1), 25–50.

Li, Y., & Wagenaar, H. (2019). Revisiting deliberative policy analysis. Policy Studies, 40(5), 427–436.

Mădroane, I. D. (2014). Citizens’ consultations – public spaces of argument evaluation? A view from critical discourse analysis. Romanian Journal of English Studies, 11(1), 203–214.

Mihajlović, J. (2016). The Challenge of Policy Coordination: Interpreting Governance of the Historic City Centres in Serbia. Doctoral thesis, Northumbria University.

Parkinson, J. (2003). Legitimacy problems in deliberative democracy. Political Studies, 51(1), 180–196.

Pędziwiatr, K. (2007). Creating new discursive arenas and influencing the policies of the state: The case of the Muslim council of Britain. Social Compass, 54(2), 267–280.

Radaelli, C. M., Dente, B., & Dossi, S. (2012). Recasting institutionalism: Institutional analysis and public policy. European Political Science, 11(4), 537–550.

Raghunath, P. (2020). The deliberative policy ecology approach to media policy. In Raghunath, P. (Ed.). Community Radio Policies in South Asia: A Deliberative Policy Ecology Approach. Springer.

Rahmat, I., Salmon, I. P. P., & Raharjo, A. S. (2021). Can deliberative policy reconcile religious conflict? A construction from the insight of Jamaah Ahmadiyah Indonesia. NALAR: Jurnal Peradaban Dan Pemikiran Islam, 5(1).

Ratanawaraha, A. (2012). City Innovation Systems in Southeast Asia: Informality, Intermediaries, and Incentives. International Development Research Centre.

Reh, C. (2012). Informal politics: The normative challenge. In Christiansen, T., & Neuhold, C. (Ed.). International Handbook on Informal Governance. Edward Edgar Publishing.

Sacramento, N. J. J. E., & Boossabong, P. (2021). Technocratic and deliberative nexus in policy analysis: Learning from smart city planning in Chiang Mai, Thailand. Journal of Asian Public Policy, 1–17.

Sangiampongsa, P. (2021). The societal sources of public policy: A review of concepts and their applications. Journal of Social Sciences, 51(1), 7–29.

Schmidt, V. A. (2011). Speaking of change: Why discourse is key to the dynamics of policy transformation. Critical Policy Studies, 5(2), 106–126.

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339.

Stevenson, H. (2016). Deliberative policy analysis. In Pattberg, P., & Zelli, F. (Ed.). Encyclopedia for Global Environmental Governance and Politics. Edward Elgar Publishing

Torraco, R. J. (2005). Writing integrative literature reviews: Guidelines and examples. Human Resource Development Review, 4(3), 356–367.

Wagenaar, H. (2014). Meaning in Action: Interpretation and Dialogue in Policy Analysis: Interpretation and Dialogue in Policy Analysis. Routledge.

Wagenaar, H., & Wenninger, F. (2020). Deliberative policy analysis, interconnectedness and institutional design: Lessons from “Red Vienna.” Policy Studies, 41(4), 411–437.

Wagle, U. (2000). The policy science of democracy: The issues of methodology and citizen participation. Policy Sciences, 33(2), 207–223.

Wodak, R. (2016). Argumentation, political. In The International Encyclopedia of Political Communication. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Wood, M. (2015). Puzzling and powering in policy paradigm shifts: Politicization, depoliticization and social learning. Critical Policy Studies, 9(1), 2–21.

Downloads

Published

2023-06-28