Thailand’s Cultural Diplomacy: Development Scheme in the 21st Century

ผู้แต่ง

  • Vittayapol Rattanakul Seriroengrit Institute of Diplomacy and International Studies, Rangsit University

คำสำคัญ:

Cultural Diplomacy, Soft Power, Thailand, Countries

บทคัดย่อ

Various countries use it in many ways such as cultural exchanges in sports, food promotions, tourism, arts and cultural shows, and many more. This paper examines how the cultural diplomacy of Thailand can be used effectively and continues to highlight how Public Diplomacy, which is a major branch of cultural diplomacy, is selected effectively. All of this falls under the umbrella of soft power and is a concept that aims to help Thailand progress. Firstly, by identifying ‘cultural diplomacy’ as a key discourse offering a counter-formulation of what the aim of soft power policy should be, and analyzing uses of this term, it highlights a need to conceptualize cultural opportunity more effectively. Secondly, Thai cultural diplomacy, public diplomacy, and soft power lacks ‘potential policy’. Thirdly, Thailand’s cultural diplomacy, public diplomacy, and soft power is still lacking potential for a ‘new opportunity’. There has been sustained critique of the conceptual and normative foundations of Thailand’s cultural diplomacy, public diplomacy, and soft power, which are used for international relations and economic policy potential.

เอกสารอ้างอิง

Arndt, R. T. (2005). The First Resort of Kings: American Cultural Diplomacy in the Twentieth Century. Potomac Books.

Bangkok Post. (2024). Unesco lists tom yum kung as humanity’s intangible cultural heritage. https://www.bangkokpost.com/thailand/general/2913882/unesco-lists-tom-yum-kung-as-humanitys-intangible-culturalheritage

Berridge, G. R., & James, A. (2003). A dictionary of diplomacy (2nd ed.). Palgrave Macmillan.

Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/qrj0902027

Carter, N., Bryant-Lukosius, D., DiCenso, A., Blythe, J., & Neville, A. J. (2014). The use of triangulation in qualitative research. Oncology Nursing Forum, 41(5), 545–547. https://doi.org/10.1188/14.onf.545-547

Chachavalpongpun, P. (2010). Reinventing Thailand: Thaksin and His Foreign Policy. Chulalongkorn University Press.

Cooper, A. F., Heine, J., & Thakur, R. (2013). The Oxford Handbook of Modern Diplomacy. Oxford University Press.

Cull, J. N. (2009). Public diplomacy lesson from the past. Figueroa Press.

Cummings, M. C., Jr. (2003). Cultural Diplomacy and the United States Government: A Survey. Center for Arts and Culture.

Disatapundhu, S., & Phuttitarn, L. (2014). Innovative Management for Asian Futures A Comparative Study of Cultural Industries in Thailand and Korea (Part 2 Thailand). Journal of Urban Culture Research, 7, 8–45. https://doi.org/10.14456/jucr.2013.12

Enders, A. (2005). Indirekte Aussenpolitik: Die Arbeit der Kulturreferate [Indirect Foreign Policy: The Work of the Cultural Departments]. In E. Brandt & C. F. Buck (Eds.), Auswärtiges Amt. Diplomatie als Beruf [Foreign Office. Diplomacy as a Profession]. Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

Hubinger, V. (2006). Encyklopedie diplomacie [Encyclopedia of Diplomacy]. Libri.

Investment Promotion. (2013). Thai Kitchen to the World. The Board of Investment of Thailand

Lahidji, K. (2016). Military coup could ruin Thai bid for UN council seat. Bangkok Post. https://www.bangkokpost.com/opinion/opinion/1021701/military-coup-could-ruin-thai-bid-for-un- council-seat

Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy. (2012). Cultural Diplomacy for the 21st Century. NUScast. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C4Qgq92bF0E

Mark. S. (2009). A greater role for cultural diplomacy. Netherlands Institute of International Relations ‘Clingendael’

Nye, J. S. (2004). Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. PublicAffairs.

Patjinka, E. (2014). Cultural diplomacy in theory and practice of contemporary international relations. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/269763112_Cultural_Diplomacy_in_Theory_and_Practice_of_Contemporary_International_Relations

Prasirtsuk, K. (2024). Thai public diplomacy in the 21st century: Approaches and purposes. USC Center on Public Diplomacy. https://uscpublicdiplomacy.org/blog/thai-public-diplomacy-21st-century-approaches-and-purposes

Rubin, H. J., & Rubin, I. S. (2012). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data. SAGE Publications

Seriroengrit, V. R., & Sukontasap, D. (2017). Thailand’s Cultural Diplomacy. RSU International Research Conference 2017. https://rsucon.rsu.ac.th/files/proceedings/inter2017/G4-03.pdf

Snitwongse, K. (2001). Thai Foreign Policy in the Global Age: Principle or Profit? Contemporary Southeast Asia, 23(2), 189-212. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25798542

Sundaravejm, S. (2008). Policy Statement of the Council Minister, Mr. Samak Sundaravejm, to Government House Monday 18 February 2008. http://www.oic.go.th/FILEWEB/CABINFOCENTER2/DRAWER051/GENERAL/DATA0000/00000240.PDF

Thailand Convention and Exhibition Bureau. (2022). Soft power the power of creativity to build the Thai economy. https://www.businesseventsthailand.com/en/press-media/news-press-release/detail/1461-soft-power- the-power-of-creativity-to-build-the-thai-economy

The Secretariat of the Cabinet. (2019). Foreign Policy. https://www.soc.go.th/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/06policy4.pdf

U.S. Department of the State. (2005). Report of the Advisory Committee on Cultural Diplomacy. http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/54374.pdf

ดาวน์โหลด

เผยแพร่แล้ว

2025-12-31