Digital Governance Assemblages: Reconfiguring Territory, Authority, and Rights in Comparative Perspective
คำสำคัญ:
Digital Governance, Assemblage Theory, State Authority, Administrative Capacityบทคัดย่อ
This article examines key problems and paradoxes of contemporary digital governance by moving beyond static, dichotomous models. It introduces and applies assemblage theory as a novel analytical framework to interpret digital governance not as a set of fixed regimes, but as dynamic, contingent, and contested socio-technical formations. Through a comparative analysis of three distinct governance assemblages—India's Aadhaar (the Biometric State Assemblage), Brazil's Marco Civil da Internet (the Multi-Stakeholder Rights Assemblage), and Australia's eSafety Commissioner (the Co-Regulatory Safety Assemblage), this paper demonstrates how heterogeneous elements of technology, law, discourse, and actors combine to produce unique governance realities. The analysis identifies recurring paradoxes, most notably the tension between the deterritorializing properties of digital technologies and persistent state efforts to reassert territorial control. The study concludes that understanding these emergent assemblages is vital for developing adaptive, legitimate governance frameworks, offering specific operational strategies for public administrators to navigate the frictional inclusion, normative fragility, and sovereign overreach that define the current digital age.
เอกสารอ้างอิง
Alexander, S. (2022). A Uniquely Australian Approach: A Thematic Analysis of the Normative Foundations of Australia's Approach to The Regulation of The Internet. Adelaide Law Review, 43(1), 345-375.
Alter, K. J. (2022). The promise and perils of theorizing international regime complexity in an evolving world. The Review of International Organizations, 17(2), 375-396. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-021-09448-8
Baer, M., & Gerlak, A. (2015). Implementing the human right to water and sanitation: a study of global and local discourses. Third World Quarterly, 36(8), 1527-1545. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2015.1043993
Banerjee, S. (2016). Aadhaar: Digital inclusion and public services in India. World Development Report 2016: Background Paper Digital Dividends (pp. 81-92). World Bank Group.
Bennett, A., & Checkel, J. T. (2014). Process tracing and the social sciences: From metaphor to analytic tool. Cambridge University Press.
Borah, P. P., & Bhuyan, A. J. (2024). Living with the Aadhaar: India’s Changing Contours of Identity and Governance. Indian Journal of Public Administration, 70(3), 615-620. https://doi.org/10.1177/00195561241257460
Bridge, G. (2021). On pragmatism, assemblage and ANT: Assembling reason. Progress in Human Geography, 45(3), 417-435. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132520924710
DeLanda, M. (2006). Deleuzian social ontology and assemblage theory. In M. Fuglsang & B. M. Sorensen (Eds.), Deleuze and the Social (pp. 250-266). Cambridge University Press.
DeLanda, M. (2016). Assemblage theory. Edinburgh University Press.
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1980). Mille plateaux (Vol. 4). éd. de Minuit.
Drezner, D. W. (2009). The Power and Peril of International Regime Complexity. Perspectives on politics, 7(1), 65-70. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592709090100
Fratini, S., Hine, E., Novelli, C., Roberts, H., & Floridi, L. (2024). Digital Sovereignty: A Descriptive Analysis and a Critical Evaluation of Existing Models. Digital Society, 3(3), 59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44206-024-00146-7
Freedom House. (2021). Brazil: Freedom on the Net 2021 (country report). https://freedomhouse.org/country/brazil/freedom-net/2021
Hoskins, G. T. (2018). Draft Once; Deploy Everywhere? Contextualizing Digital Law and Brazil’s Marco Civil da Internet Television & New Media, 19(5), 431-447. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476417738568
Jain, M. (2019). The Aadhaar Card: Cybersecurity Issues with India’s Biometric Experiment. Univeristy of Washington. https://jsis.washington.edu/news/the-aadhaar-card-cybersecurity-issues-with-indias-biometric-experiment/
Katzenbach, C., & Ulbricht, L. (2019). Algorithmic governance. Internet Policy Review, 8(4), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.14763/2019.4.1424
Khera, R. (2017). Impact of Aadhaar on welfare programmes. Economic and Political Weekly, 52(50), 61-70.
Kornberger, M., Pflueger, D., & Mouritsen, J. (2017). Evaluative infrastructures: Accounting for platform organization. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 60, 79-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2017.05.002
Legg, S. (2011). Assemblage/apparatus: using Deleuze and Foucault. Area, 43(2), 128-133. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4762.2011.01010.x
Lessig, L. (2009). Code: And Other Laws of Cyberspace. ReadHowYouWant.com.
Marcus, G. E., & Saka, E. (2006). Assemblage. Theory, culture & society, 23(2-3), 101-106. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276406062573
Martin, N. (2025). Online safety regulation of deepfake abuse: a case study on Australia’s eSafety Commissioner. Griffith Law Review, 34(1), 23-46. https://doi.org/10.1080/10383441.2025.2504791
Masiero, S., & Shakthi, S. (2020). Grappling with Aadhaar: Biometrics, Social Identity and the Indian State. South Asia Multidisciplinary Academic Journal, 23. https://doi.org/10.4000/samaj.6279
Meng, W., Wang, F., & Xin, G. (2024). Making agile governance work: the community grid as a ‘safety valve’ institution during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Chinese Governance, 9(2), 197-220. https://doi.org/10.1080/23812346.2024.2332005
Milakovich, M. E. (2021). Digital governance: Applying advanced technologies to improve public service. Routledge.
Morrison, T. H., Bodin, Ö., Cumming, G. S., Lubell, M., Seppelt, R., Seppelt, T., & Weible, C. M. (2023). Building blocks of polycentric governance. Policy Studies Journal, 51(3), 475-499. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12492
Müller, M. (2015). Assemblages and Actor-networks: Rethinking Socio-material Power, Politics and Space. Geography Compass, 9(1), 27-41. https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12192
Neto, J. A. M. (2018). The Operation of Multistakeholderism in Brazilian Internet Governance: Governance Innovation through Multistakeholderism Generativity. University of Kent.
Onlyias. (2023). Massive Aadhaar Data Breach Of 815 Million Indians. https://pwonlyias.com/current-affairs/aadhaar-data-breach/
Phillips, J. (2006). Agencement/Assemblage. Theory, Culture & Society, 23(2-3), 108-109. https://doi.org/10.1177/026327640602300219
Plantin, J. C., Lagoze, C., Edwards, P. N., & Sandvig, C. (2018). Infrastructure studies meet platform studies in the age of Google and Facebook. New media & society, 20(1), 293-310. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816661553
Rodriguez, K., & Pinho, L. (2015). Marco Civil Da Internet: The Devil in the Detail. Electronic Frontier Foundation.
Sassen, S. (2008). Territory, authority, rights: From medieval to global assemblages. Princeton university press.
Sautchuk-Patrício, N. (2022). Revisiting net neutrality from a polycentric perspective: Brazilian and German scenarios (No. 31). Global Cooperation Research Papers.
Savage, G. C. (2020). What is policy assemblage?. Territory, Politics, Governance, 8(3), 319-335. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2018.1559760
Singh, P. (2021). Aadhaar and data privacy: biometric identification and anxieties of recognition in India. Information, Communication & Society, 24(7), 978-993. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1668459
Smith, M., Nolan, M., & Gaffey, J. (2024). Online safety and social media regulation in Australia: eSafety Commissioner v X Corp. Griffith Law Review, 33(1), 2-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10383441.2024.2405760
Steibel, F. (2012, October 22-25). Designing online deliberation using web 2.0 technologies: drafting a bill of law on internet regulation in Brazil [Paper Presentation]. ICEGOV '12: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance. New York, United States. https://doi.org/10.1145/2463728.2463738
Taylor, J. (2024). X says “free speech has prevailed” after eSafety commissioner drops case over Wakeley church attack posts. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2024/jun/05/x-elon-musk-vs-australia-esafety-commissioner-wakeley-church-stabbing-footage
Xin, G., Cui, J., Wang, F., & Zhang, J. (2025). Demystifying digital economic performance in China: A local officials’ career incentive perspective. International Public Management Journal, 28(6), 747-769. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2025.2474512
Xin, G., Esembe, E. E., & Chen, J. (2023). The mixed effects of e-participation on the dynamic of trust in government: Evidence from Cameroon. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 82(1), 69-95. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.12569
Xin, G., & Huang, J. (2025). Making the people’s voice heard: pathways of E-participative governance in China. Journal of Chinese Governance, 10(1), 33-56. https://doi.org/10.1080/23812346.2024.2400634
Xin, G., & Wang, Y. (2025). The Algorithmic Leviathan and the Digital Polis: A Review of Global Digital Governance Dilemmas and Pathways. Chinese Journal of International Review, 7(2), 2550006. https://doi.org/10.1142/S2630531325500064
Yeung, K. (2018). Algorithmic regulation: A critical interrogation. Regulation & governance, 12(4), 505-523. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12158
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications (Vol. 6). Sage Publishing.
ดาวน์โหลด
เผยแพร่แล้ว
ฉบับ
ประเภทบทความ
สัญญาอนุญาต

อนุญาตภายใต้เงื่อนไข Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.