Shared E-scooter Usage in a Closed System Area: A Case Study of Chulalongkorn University
Main Article Content
Abstract
Electric scooter rental services have been increasingly utilized in Europe, America, and Asia. In 2018, Thailand also began offering electric scooter rentals, with a trend towards expanding these services in closed areas, particularly within university campuses. However, there are no specific laws supporting the use of electric scooters, so their use in public areas is subject to the discretion of authorities. This research focuses on Chulalongkorn University as the study area, given that electric scooter rental services have been consistently available there since 2022, with a stable user base compared to other areas. The study area is divided into three zones based on their physical characteristics, separated by a major road: (1) The academic institution area - auditorium side, (2) The academic institution area - administration buildings and dormitories side, and (3) The Sam Yan commercial area. This research examines how the physical characteristics of these areas affect electric scooter rental usage behaviors. Data were collected from service providers, physical area surveys, and questionnaires, and then analyzed using statistical methods. The research focuses on three main questions: usage routes, zone crossing, and the number of users relative to the zone. The findings reveal that bike lanes are the most frequently used routes for electric scooters in both closed and public areas. The usage of roads is similar to bike lanes in closed areas, but sidewalks are significantly less used. In terms of zone crossing on public roads, electric scooter users prefer more convenient methods over safer ones, despite legal restrictions. Lastly, the number of users in each zone does not depend on whether the area is closed or public, but it is suggested that the presence of central and residential buildings tends to increase the number of electric scooter users in those areas.
Article Details
References
ธรรญรธ พะกะยะ และอัจฉราพร สีหวัฒนะ. (2566, กันยายน-ธันวาคม ). มาตรการทางกฎหมายในการกำกับดูแลยานพาหนะไฟฟ้าขนาดเล็กในประเทศไทย กรณีศึกษาเฉพาะสกู๊ตเตอร์ไฟฟ้า. วารสารศึกษิตาลัย, 4(3). https://so01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/SJ/article/view/270035
ปรัตถกร กษิรวัฒน์. (2563). การพัฒนาดัชนีความเหมาะสมทางกายภาพของการใช้งานสกู๊ตเตอร์ไฟฟ้าบนถนนในเมือง [วิทยานิพนธ์ปริญญามหาบัณฑิต, จุฬาลงกรณ์มหาวิทยาลัย]. CUIR. https://cuir.car.chula.ac.th/bitstream/123456789/77198/1/6170465421.pdf
รัฐพล ทองแป้น. (2566). การเปลี่ยนแปลงพฤติกรรมการเดินทางจากการใช้สกู๊ตเตอร์ไฟฟ้าร่วมกันในจุฬาลงกรณ์มหาวิทยาลัย [วิทยานิพนธ์ปริญญามหาบัณฑิต, จุฬาลงกรณ์มหาวิทยาลัย]. CUIR. https://cuir.car.chula.ac.th/handle/123456789/84468
Bai, S., & Jiao, J. (2020, July). Dockless e-scooter usage patterns and urban built environments: A comparison study of Austin, TX, and Minneapolis, MN. Travel Behaviour and Society,20, 264-272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2020.04.005
CB Insights. (2021). The micromobility revolution: How bikes and scooters are shaking up urban transport worldwide. https://www.cbinsights.com/research/report/micromobility-revolution/
Göran, S. (2020). Making mobility as a service: Towards governance principles and pathways [Doctoral dissertation, Chalmers University of Technology]. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/341179834_Making_Mobility-as-a-Service_Towards_Governance_Principles_and_Pathways
Jinghai, H., Hongtai, Y., Chaojing, L., Rong, Z., Linchuan, Y., & Yi, W. (2021, May). Influence of the built environment on e-scooter sharing ridership: A tale of five cities. Journal of Transport Geography, 93, 103084. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2021.103084
Mayhew, L. J., & Bergin, C. (2019, April 11). Impact of e‐scooter injuries on emergency department imaging. Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology, 63, 461-466. https://doi.org/10.1111/1754-9485.12889
Meyer, M. D., & Miller, E. (2001). Urban transportation planning: A decision-oriented approach (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235363396_Urban_Transportation_Planning_A_Decision-Oriented_Approach/citations
Paudel, M., & Fah Yap, F. (2021). Front steering design guidelines formulation for e-scooters considering the influence of sitting and standing riders on self-stability and safety performance. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering, 235(9). https://doi.org/10.1177/0954407021992176
Phithakkitnukooon, S., Patanukhom, K., & Demissie, M. G. (2021). Predicting spatiotemporal demand of dockless e-scooter sharing services with a masked fully convolutional network. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 2021, 10(11), 773. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi10110773
SAE International Recommended Practice. (2019). Taxonomy and classification of powered micromobility vehicles. SAE International. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4271/J3194_201911
Verkehrswende, A. (2019). Shared e-scooters: Paving the road ahead policy recommendations for local government.https://www.agora-verkehrswende.de/fileadmin/Projekte/2019/E-Tretroller_im_Stadtverkehr/Agora-Verkehrswende_Shared-E-Scooters-Paving-the-Road-Ahead_WEB.pdf
Wibowo, R. Y. (2022). Assessing the potential of developing an ecosystem for electric scooters in Bangkok, Thailand [Master’s thesis, Chulalongkorn University]. CUIR. https://cuir.car.chula.ac.th/handle/123456789/82794
Zhang, W., Buehler, R., Broaddus, A., & Sweeney, T. (2021). What type of infrastructures do e-scooter riders prefer? A route choice model. Transportation Research Part D Transport and Environment, 94, 102761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.102761
Zuniga-Garcia, N., Juri, N. R., Perrine, K. A., & Machemehl, R. B. (2021). E-scooters in urban infrastructure: Understanding sidewalk, bike lane, and roadway usage from trajectory data. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 9(3), 983-994. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2021.04.004