Prosthetic Architecture: Lingering for Nostalgic Futurism
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article explores prosthetic architecture, a concept that combines nostalgia and futurism to reimagine the conservation of architecture in everyday life. Inspired by the idea of architecture as a "prosthesis" that extends and adapts to modern needs, the objective is to propose an alternative approach to architectural conservation — one that not only preserves cultural and historical value but also integrates new infrastructure and functions to align with contemporary lifestyles. By reviewing key theories, such as Sigmund Freud's views in Civilization and its Discontents and Mark Wigley's Prosthetic Theory: The Disciplining of Architecture, this research builds a theoretical foundation for understanding how architecture can serve as both a bridge to the past and a path to the future.
A significant part of the analysis focuses on Anosh Nadeem Butt's work, which is directly based on the principles of prosthetic architecture. His designs are reviewed to highlight how architectural interventions can serve as "prostheses" that respect the past while providing new functions and identities. This review forms a core part of this article’s argument, showing how these concepts can be translated into practice. The research methodology involves a comprehensive review of theoretical texts and practical case studies, examining both real-world and conceptual projects that embody the principles of prosthetic architecture.
The case studies explore the historically innovative use of iron in restorations as an early form of architectural augmentation, built projects that focus on contemporary design adding new layers to existing structures, and a couple of projects of paper architecture, which examines speculative designs that challenge the limits of architecture and urbanism. By analysing these cases through the lens of Wigley’s theories and Butt's application, the article demonstrates how new architectural interventions can reintroduce relevance, enhance usability, and provoke thought about our relationship with the past and the future.
The findings suggest that prosthetic architecture can offer a viable framework for future architectural practices. It combines theoretical insight with practical applications, presenting a model for how we can think about preserving architectural heritage while embracing innovation. Ultimately, this research aims to establish the principles of prosthetic architecture and propose how these can be applied to create sustainable, meaningful, and adaptive urban environments.
Article Details
References
Bofill, R., Pierce, C., & Weaver, T. (2014). Ricardo Bofill in conversation with Christopher Pierce & Thomas Weaver. AA Files, 69, 128–137.
Butt, A. (2021). Designing prosthetic architecture. International Journal of Scientific and Engineering Research, 12(2), 497-507.
Corbusier, L. (1970). Towards a new architecture (F. Etchells, Trans.). Architectural Press. (Original work published 1923)
Corbusier, L. (1987). The decorative art of today (J. I. Dunnett, Trans.). MIT Press. (Original work published 1925)
Freud, S. (1955). Civilization and its discontents (J. Riviere, Trans., 7th impression ed.). Hogarth Press – the Institute of Psychoanalysis.(Original work published 1930)
Gardinetti, M. (2020, August 22). Archigram, Instant city - Tecnne | arquitectura y contextos. https://tecnne.com/biblioteca/archigram-instant-city/
Giedion, S. (1948). Mechanization takes command. Oxford University Press.
Ginzburg, M. (2018). Style and epoch (J. Nicolson, Trans.). Ginzburg Design with Fontanka Publications. (Original work published 1924)
Hawkes, D. (2016). Tate modern’s new building: the Switch House. The Burlington Magazine, 158(1362), 730–734.
Hearn, M. F. (2003). Ideas that shaped buildings. The MIT Press.
Hobson, B. (2020, May 13). Archigram’s instant city enables “a village to become a city for a week.” Dezeen. https://www.dezeen.com/2020/05/13/archigram-instant-city-peter-cook-video-interview-Vdf/
Hofer, J. (1934). Medical dissertation on nostalgia (C. K. Anspach, Trans.). Bulletin of the Institute of the History of Medicine, 2(6), 376-391. The Johns Hopkins University Press. (Original work published 1688)
Imagine, having improvised volumes ‘floating’ in space, like balloons. (2020, Feb 24.) ArchDaily. https://www.archdaily.com/781065/interview-with-yona-friedman-imagine-having-improvised-volumes-floating-in-space-like-balloons
Mikuriya, H. F. (2023, November 26). Public lecture on ‘Nostalgia and Architecture’. AA Visiting School Bangkok 2023.
Something Curated. (2020, October 26). From transportive prosthetics to edible architecture — The story of Haus-Rucker-Co. https://somethingcurated.com/2020/10/26/from-transportive-prosthetics to-edible-architecture-the-story-of-haus-rucker-co/
Spatial Agency: Haus-Rucker-Co. (n.d.). Spatial Agency: About. https://www.spatialagency.net/database/haus-rucker-co
The Tate modern project London, UK. (n.d.). Herzog & de Meuron. https://www.herzogdemeuron.com/projects/263-the-tate-modern-project/
Viollet-le-Duc, E.-E. (1868).Entretiens sur l’architecture. A. Morel et cie.
Viollet-le-Duc, E.-E. (1875). Discourses on architecture (B. Bucknall, Trans., Vol. II). Ticknor and Company. (Original work published 1872)
Wang, L. (2017, March 5). Architect turns old cement factory into incredible fairytale home – And the interior will blow you away. Inhabitat.Com. https://inhabitat.com/architect-turns-old-cement-factory-into-incredible-fairytale-home-and-the-interior-will-blow-you-away/
Wigley, M. (1991, August). Prosthetic theory: The disciplining of architecture. Assemblage, 15, 6-29.