Façades as Defensive Interfaces: Bottom-Up Architectural Adaptations Against Urban Monkeys in Lopburi Old Town
Main Article Content
Abstract
Human–monkey conflict in Lopburi’s old town has long shaped residents’ lives and the form of its historic urban fabric. This study investigates bottom-up architectural adaptations developed by local residents to protect their properties from urban monkeys, focusing on both the typology of deterrent elements and their spatial distribution.
Fieldwork documented the façades of buildings surrounding Phra Prang Sam Yot, analyzing each vertical bay from the second floor upward to record how deterrent elements were applied as single or combined strategies. Six principal types of monkey-deterrent elements were identified: ironwork, wire-mesh grilles, solid and slatted façade cladding, barbed wire, and electric fencing. Many of these remain despite the recent reduction in monkey populations, reflecting a long-standing resident-driven response to the pressures of human–monkey coexistence.
Findings show that deterrent measures often appeared as layered protective strategies in areas of intense conflict or higher commercial value, while other sections remained unprotected due to building abandonment or the relocation of residents. The study highlights the façade as a negotiated interface between humans and monkeys, shaping both the appearance and identity of the historic streetscape. Yet these measures remain fragmented, implemented individually by property owners with no communication or coordination, leading to discontinuous protection across the street-façade network and reducing overall effectiveness.
The research underscores the need for integrated urban strategies that recognize the dynamics of human–wildlife coexistence and draw on adaptive architectural mechanisms to inform urban-space design that supports multi-species coexistence, grounded in species behavior, environmental context, and local resources.
Article Details
References
Boonkusol, D., Phothisuwan, P., & Nokkaew, W. (2018). Population and behavior surveys of long-tailed macaque (Macaca fascicularis) in the old town, Lopburi Province. OnLine Journal of Biological Sciences, 18(2), 226–236. https://thescipub.com/abstract/ojbsci.2018.226.236
Cripps, K., & Olarn, K. (2020, October 14). Ancient Thai city grapples with surging monkey population. CNN. https://edition.cnn.com/travel/article/lopburi-monkey-temple-thailand-intl-hnk/index.html
Hirakawa, Y. (2020, April 16). Starving for attention: Nara’s famous deer hit the streets in search of food. Mainichi Japan. https://mainichi.jp/english/articles/20200416/p2a/00m/0na/021000c
Honda, T., Iijima, H., Tsuboi, J., & Uchida, K. (2018). A review of urban wildlife management from the animal-personality perspective: The case of urban deer. Science of the Total Environment, 644, 576–582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.335
Juttuporn, A. (2020). Incidences and characteristics of monkey-related injuries in Mueng District, Lopburi. Chiang Mai Journal, 59(3), 345-352. https://he05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/CMJ/article/view/175
Kurosawa, R., Kanai, Y., Matsuda, M., & Okuyama, M. (2003). Conflict between humans and crows in greater Tokyo: Garbage management as a possible solution. Global Environmental Research, 7(2), 139–147.
Mahaprom, R., & Kulabtong, S. (2018). Observation of feeding habit of the Asian water monitor, Varanus salvator (Laurenti, 1768)(Squamata: Varanidae) on an Asian toad, Duttaphrynus melanostictus (Schneider, 1799) (Anura: Bufonidae) in Thailand. Biodiversity Journal, 9(3), 213–216. https://doi.org/10.31396/biodiv.jour.2018.9.3.213.216
Malaivijitnond, S., & Hamada, Y. (2012). Human impact on long-tailed macaques in Thailand. In S. Malaivijitnond & L. Huffman (Eds.), Monkeys on the edge: Ecology and management of long-tailed macaques in Southeast Asia (pp. 118–136). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139047799.009
Matichon Online. (2018, April 17). Veterinarian points out the surge in water-monitor population due to lack of natural predators [สัตวแพทย์ชี้ ประชากรเหี้ยพุ่งพรวด ศัตรูธรรมชาติน้อย ส่วนใหญ่แก่ตาย]. https://www.matichon.co.th/local/quality-life/news_920361
Morishita, E., Itao, K., Sasaki, K., & Higuchi, H. (2003). Movements of crows in urban areas, based on PHS tracking. Global Environmental Research, 7(2), 181–192.
Soulsbury, C. D., & White, P. C. L. (2015). Human–wildlife interactions in urban areas: A review of conflicts, benefits and management. Wildlife Research, 42(7), 541–553. https://doi.org/10.1071/WR14229
Thairath. (2023, December 23). Updating monkey populations: The first step to solving the issues [อัปเดตประชากรลิงลพบุรี รหัสแรกสู่การแก้ไขปัญหา]. https://www.thairath.co.th/scoop/theissue/2746255
Theptha, V. (2022, February 25). The monkey habitats in the community environments of the historical city: The commercial area in Lop Buri Province. Journal of the Association of Researchers, 26(4), 273–290. https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jar/article/view/255043