Innovative Leadership of School Administrators Affecting Effectiveness of the Pracharathschool under Samutsongkram Educational Service

Main Article Content

วัชรพงศ์ ทัศนบรรจง (Wacharaphong Thatsanabanjong)
จิตติรัตน์ แสงเลิศอุทัย (Jittirat Saengloetuthai)

Abstract

This research aimed to: 1) study the level of innovation leadership of school administrators in educational institutions in the Pracharat Public School Project under the Office of Samutsongkhram Primary Education Area; 2) study the effectiveness of educational institutions in the Pracharat Public School Project under the Office of Samutsongkhram Primary Education Area; and 3) analyze the innovation leadership affecting the effectiveness of educational institutions in the Pracharat Public School Project under the Office of Samutsongkhram Primary Education Area. The sample group consisted of 216 school administrators, teachers, personnel in the Pracharat Public School Project under the Office of Samutsongkhram Primary Education Area, derived by proportional stratified random sampling as distributed by district. The research instrument was a questionnaire constructed by the researcher with the content validity between 0.67 and 1.00., and the reliability of questionnaires in aspects of innovative leaders of school administrators in the Pracharat Public School Project had the alpha coefficient of 0.96 and the effectiveness of the schools in the Pracharat Public School Project had the alpha coefficient of 0.98. Data were analyzed by using percentage, mean, standard deviation, correlation coefficient analysis and stepwise multiple regression analysis the findings of this research were as follows: 1. Innovative leadership level was at a high level, both in the overall picture and each aspect, consisting of having a vision, creating an atmosphere in the organization, management, participation, networking and creating innovative organizations respectively. 2. The level of effectiveness of educational institutions was at a high level, both in the overview and in each aspect consisting of moral teaching in schools, teacher self-development, student-focused teaching management, ability to teach according to STEM study guidelines and ability on information and communication technology (ICT) and English respectively. 3. Innovative leadership in aspects of creating an organizational climate (X5) and innovative organizations (X2) together predicted the effectiveness of educational institutions in the Pracharat Public School Project under the Office of Samutsongkhram Primary Education Area at the percentage of 63.20 with statistical significance level of .05. The regression equation was    = 1.14 + 0.57 (X5) + 0.14 (X2).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section
บทความวิจัย

References

Dejakup, P. (2015). Learning Management in the 21st Century. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn
University Press. (in Thai)
George. (2012, June). Innovation for inclusive growth: Towards a theoretical
framework and a research Agenda. Journal of Management Studies, 49 (4), 661-683
Horth, D. M. & Vehar, J. (2012). Becoming a leader who fosters innovation.
Baffles: Guildford & King Lynn.
Karnasuta, A. (2009). The Relationship between School Administrators Leadership and
Administrational Effectiveness of Basic Education Schools underthe Office of Prachuabkhirikhan Educational Service Area 1. Master of Science, Master of Education Educational Administration Program Graduate school Phetchaburi Rajabhat University. (in Thai)
Khumwongdee, M. (2013). Relationship between learning organization and effectiveess
of Pluakdang School under the Rayong primary education service area office 1. Master of Science, Master of Education Educational Administration Program Graduate school Burapha University. (in Thai)
Lindegaard. (2009, March). Navigating terrains of violence: How South African male
youngsters negotiate social change. Social Dynamics, 35 (1), 19-35.
McMillan. (2010). Cognitive development. California: Sage Publication.
Miller, Klokgiers & Deppen. (2012). Diffusion of innovations. New York: Simon &
Schuster.
Ministry of Education. (2009). Basic Education Core Curriculum B.E.2551 (A.D.2008).
Bangkok: Khet Chatuchak. (in Thai)
Office of the Basic Education Commission, Office of Educational Innovation Development.
(2016). School Administrators Development Course Pracharat School Project. [Online]. Retrieved December 16, 2018, from http://203.159.154.241/inno_obec/
index.php?module=view_group_inno&id=16. (in Thai)
Patel. (2012). Evolutionary crossroads in developmental biology. Development,
139 (11), 2637-2638.
Phongmit, W. (2013). Factors Affecting the Administrative Effectiveness of Schools
under the Office of Secondary Educational Service Areas, Area 21. Master of Education Thesis Educational Administration Program Graduate school Maha Sarakham University. (in Thai)
Phumali, K. (2014). The administrative factors affecting the effectiveness of small
school in the eastern region. Doctor of Philosophy Thesis Program in Management for Development Education Graduate School Rajabhat Rajanagarindra University. (in Thai)
Pollock. (2008). Pharmaceutical meaning‐making beyond marketing: Racialized
subjects of generic thiazide. Belmont, CA: Cengage/Wadsworth.
Prajanant, O. (2014). An educational innovative organization: A new choice of
educational administration. Bangkok: Top. (in Thai)
Roscorla, T. (2010). The 7 steps to innovative. Retrived 16 December 2017, from
http://www.convergemag.com/policy/The-7-Elements-of-Innovative-Leadership.html
Saengloetuthai, J. (2014). Educational research methods. Nakhon Pathom: Nakhon Pathom
Rajabhat University. (in Thai)
Sinlarat, P. (2012). CCPR. A new paradigm model of creative and productive leaders.
Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press. (in Thai)
Sisaat, B. (2013). Statistical methods for research, Volume 1 (5th edition). Bangkok:
Suwiriya Sarasan. (in Thai)
Tamtool, V. (2014). Innovative Leadership of School Administrators affecting High
Performance Organization of School in the Secondary Educational Service Area Office 21. Master of Education thesis Educational Administration Program Graduate school Khon Kaen University. (in Thai)
The Secretariat of the House of Representatives, Office of the Commission. (2016).
Education reform. [Online]. Retrieved December 15, 2018, from http://www.senate.
go.th/w3c/senate/comm.php?url=home&comm_id=1548. (in Thai)
Toknak, K. (2013). A Factor Analysis of Innovation Leadership for Basic
Educational Administrators. Master of Education Thesis Educational Administration Program Faculty of Education Naresuan University. (in Thai)
Wattanarojphaibun, O. (2010). The development of innovative leadership model.
Master of Public Administration Thesis Department of Public Administration Bachelor of Science National Institute of Development Administration. (in Thai)