Main Article Content
The purposes of research were (1) to meta-evaluation and (2) to meta-synthesis of the assessment report of the promotion and development of the quality of life of the disabled. The sample was 21 project evaluation reports of the promotion and development of the quality of life of the disabled. The tools was meta-evaluation and data recording form. The statistical methods included frequency, percentage, mean, S.D. and content analysis.
The result revealed that, (1) meta-evaluation of the project evaluation reports of the promotion and development of the quality of life of the disabled report quality overview of all standards at an excellent level (= 4.81, S.D.= 0.12), feasibility (=4.90, S.D. = 0.17), accuracy (=4.89, S.D. = 0.14), utility (=4.88, S.D. = 0.15), propriety (=4.74, S.D. = 0.26), evaluation accountability (=4.60, S.D. = 0.43). And (2) meta-synthesis found that most of research issues related to education, purpose of research used CIPP Model, research tool used a questionnaire, method for data analysis was mean, S.D. and percentage.
Blake, A. M. (2013). An Empirical examination and metaevaluation of the impact evaluation proscee. Wayne State University.
Empowerment Of Persons With Disabilities Act (Second Edition), B.E. 2012. (2012). Royal Thai Government Gazette. [online]. Retrived October 15, 2012, from http://www.fwc1954.org/ModLaw-1.pdf.
Empowerment Of Persons With Disabilities Act, B.E. 2007. (2007). Royal Thai Government Gazette. [online]. Retrived February 26, 2020, from http://fio.co.th/WeB/cripple/cripple02.pdf
Engholm, K. R. (2016). A meta-evaluation of the success case method applied to a leadership development program. Rutgers University-Graduate School of Applied and Professional Psychology.
Erwin, E. J., Brotherson, M. J., & Summers, J. A. (2011). Understanding Qualitative Metasynthesis: Issues and Opportunities in Early Childhood Intervention Research. Journal of Early Intervention, 33(3), 186-200.
Finfgeld, D. L. (2003). Metasynthesis: The state of the art--so far. Qualitative health research, 13(7), 893-904.
Finfgeld-Connett, D. (2010). Generalizability and transferability of meta‐synthesis research findings. Journal of advanced nursing, 66(2), 246-254.
Kanjanawasee, S. (2009). Evaluation theory. 7th th. Bangkok. The Publisher of Bangkok. (in Thai)
Overstreet Jr, K. E. (2017). Organization Development and US Institutions of Higher Education: A Thematic Meta-Synthesis of Approaches and Practice. Benedictine University.
Phattanapakornphong, K. (2018). Guidelines for Curriculum Evaluation in Basic Education Level Applied Using by Meta-evaluation and Evaluation Synthesis. Master Thesis, M.S. (Evaluation Methodology). Bangkok: Graduate School, Srinakharinwirot University.
Ratanachoochote, S. (2009). Access to the Rights of the Handicapped in Accordance with the Act of Promotion and Development of the Quality of Life of the Handicapped, B.E.2550: Master of Arts (Social Development) National Institute of Development Administration. (in Thai)
Schreiber, R., Crooks, D., & Stern, P. (1997). Qualitative meta-synthesis; issues and techniques. Completing a qualitative project; details and dialogue. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Scriven, M. (1969). An Introduction to Meta-Evaluation. Educational product report, 2(5), 36-38.
Srisa-ard, B. (2011). Basic research. 9th th. Bangkok: Suwiriyasarn. (in Thai)
Stufflebeam, D. L. (2001). Evaluation models. New directions for evaluation, 2001(89), 7-98.
Stufflebeam, D. L., Madaus, G. F., & Kellaghan, T. (2000). Evaluation models. Boston: Kluwer Academic.
Sukjaroen, N. and Yoonisil, W. (2014). Meta-Analysis and Meta-Synthesis. Rajabhat Maha Sarakham University Journal, 8(3), 43-56. (in Thai)
Sutthisakorn, U. (2008). Meta-synthesis of the people research in solving the economic problem in community: College of Interdisciplinary Studies, Thammasat University. (in Thai)
Wongwanich, S. (2007). Meta-evaluation: methodology and capplication. Bangkok: Office
for National Education Standards and Quality Assessment (Public Organization). Faculty of Education, Chulalongkorn University. (in Thai)
Yarbrough, D. B., Shulha, L. M., Hopson, R. K., & Caruthers, F. A. (2011). The program evaluation standards: A guide for evaluators and evaluation users. (3rd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.