The Evaluation of the PhD Curriculum in Educational Administration (Revised 2561 B.E.) Faculty of Education Silpakorn University

Main Article Content

Mattana Wangthanomsak
ประเสริฐ อินทร์รักษ์
Vorakarn Suksodkiew
Nopadol Chenaksara
Sakdipan Tonwimonrat
Saisuda Tiacharoen
Nuchnara Rattanasiraprapha
Sanguan Inrak
Khattiya Duangsamran

Abstract

This research aimed to evaluate the PhD curriculum in Educational Administration and to identify the recommendations and expectations of the PhD curriculum in Educational Administration. The data was collected from interviews and questionnaires from lecturers, PhD students and their superiors following Stake’s concept (1967) of curriculum evaluation model in 3 aspects: antecedents, transaction and outcomes.  The data was analyzed using frequency, percentage, mean, standard deviation and content analysis.


The findings revealed that:


  1. The PhD curriculum in Educational Administration was found appropriate and satisfying in all aspects: antecedents, transaction and outcomes.

  2. The recommendations and expectations of the PhD Curriculum in Educational administration were as follow: updating the curriculum content and activities to be more applicable and enable the students to the role of PhD graduates and future research; developing students’ personalities, increasing relationship building activities for students, increasing activities for stimulating knowledge and experience sharing among PhD students, PhD graduates and lecturers; and developing students’ technology skills and communication skills.

Article Details

Section
บทความวิจัย

References

Abidin, Munirul. (2015). “Higher Education Quality : Perception Differences among Internal and
External Stakeholders.” International Education Studies 8(12): 185-192.
Anannawee Paradee. (2015). “The Evaluation of Doctor of Philosophy Program Curriculum in
Educational Administration (Revised B.E.2554) Burapha University” SWU Educational Administration Journal 12(23): 98-107. (In Thai)
Imsawasd Prayoon. (2017). “The Satisfaction of the Employers towards the Work of Educational
Administration Postgraduates, Faculty of Education, Burapha University” Academic Services
Journal, Prince of Songkla University 28 (2): 72-84. (In Thai)
Lunenburg Fred C. and Allan C. Ornstein. (2012). Educational Administration: Concepts and
Practices, 6th ed. Belmont, CA : Wadsworth.
Nanthachai Suchada, et al. (2014).“The Evaluation of Doctoral Degree Program in Educational
Administration, Department of Education, Faculty of Education at Kasetsart University”
The Golden Teak: Humanities and Social Science Journal 15(2) 91-103. (In Thai)
Patterson Judith, Jiang Binbin, Chandler Mary and Chan Tak Cheung. (2012). “Educational
Leadership Program Effectiveness: Evaluation from Graduates and their Principals.”
Georgia Educational Researcher 9(1): 38-60.
Petchroj Laddawan. (2019) Evaluation of Curriculum in Master of Education Program in Educational
Administration Rajapruk University Using CIPPIEST Model” Journal of Humanities and
Social Sciences, Rajapruk University 5(2): 18-36. (In Thai)
Ringler Marjorie C. and William Rouse. (2007).“Evaluation of a Doctoral Program in Educational
Leadership.” National Council of Professors of Education Administration. Retrieved
15/7/2021 from Evaluation of a Doctoral Program in Educational Leadership (cnx.org)
Stake, Robert E. (1967). “The Countenance of Educational Evaluation” Teachers college Record 68:
523-540.
Wangthanomsak Mattana. (2017). “The Evaluation of the Ph.D. Curriculum in Educational
Administration (revised 2556 B.E.)” Veridian E-Journal ฉบับ International Humanities,
Social Science and Arts 10(4): 348-361.