Learning Management Model for Learning and Innovation Skills Development of Students Demonstration Secondary School, Nakhon Pathom Province

Main Article Content

วสวัตติ์ วงศ์พันธุเศรษฐ์ (Wasawat Vongphantuses)
นพพร จันทรนำชู (Nopporn Chantaranamchoo)

Abstract

Learning and innovation skills are essential skills for human capital development. This research aimed to study the model of learning management for developing learning and innovation skills. The 15 key informants included school administrators, teachers, parents, and students of demonstration secondary schools in Nakhon Pathom province. The research instrument for data collection were in-depth interviews and focus group discussions guidelines. Data analysis was grounded theory construction. Research results were as follows. 1. Learning management for developing learning and innovation skills was composed of exploring students’ potential and needs; stimulating students’ questioning and discussion; planning to arrange learning activities; organizing learning activities to relate to the subject group; using research, diverse instructional methods, and multi-perspective evaluation. 2. The success conditions of learning management included 2.1 Schools establish a vision and identity in support of learning and innovation; 2.2 Educational standards provide the indicators accommodating creativity, innovation, learning management, and research. 2.3 Teachers manage the learning through practice to create experiences; use research to develop educational innovations; use learning exchange among teachers to feedback on developing students, and use diverse methods of learning assessment. 2.4 Students possess skills necessary for learning and innovation; engaged in participatory learning, discussion, and sharing opinions; accept different ideas and learn from working together. 2.5 Physical and social learning environments support shared learning among subject groups, including agencies both within and outside of the school. 2.6 Cooperative networks to support educational resources include demonstration schools, university faculties, and external agencies.  

Article Details

Section
บทความวิจัย

References

Akinoglu, O., and Tandogn, R. (2006). The effects of problem – based active learning in

Science education on students’ academic achievement, attitude and

concept learning. [Online]. Retrieved April, 29, 2020, from

http://www.ejmste.com/v3n1/EJMSTEv3n1_Akinoglu

Ashley L. M., Neil A. K., and Kathryn, S.O. (2015). “Exploring the Effects of Active Learning on

High School Students’ Outcomes and Teachers’ Perceptions of Biotechnology and

Genetics Instruction”. Journal of Agricultural Education 56(138-152): 138-149.

Bonwell, C.C. (2003). Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom. [Online].

Retrieved April, 29, 2020, from www.active-learning-site.com

Chantaranamchoo, N., Polpanthin, Y., and Laophuangsak, P. (2019). “The Western Region Schools’ Learning Management Model Development for Student Quality Development in Accordance with the Basic Educational Standards.” Veridian E-Journal, Silpakorn University 12(2): 758-774. (in Thai)

Chantaranamchoo, N. and Sukjairungwattana,T. (2018). “Guidelines for Professional Skills of

Students from the Institute of Vocational Education: Central Region 4 for Human Development towards Thailand 4.0.” Veridian E-Journal, Silpakorn University 11(1): 2843-2859. (in Thai)

Comia, A., and Ryan, C. (2006). Creative Movement: A Powerful Strategy to Teach Science.

[Online]. Retrieved April, 29, 2020, from

http://openlibrary.org/b/OL21549770M/Creative_moverment_A_powerful_

strategy_to_teach_science

Corbin, J.M., and Strauss, A.L. (2008). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. 3rd ed. Sage Publication, Inc: London.

enGauge. (2003). 21st Century Skills for 21st Century Learners. [Online]. Retrieved May, 20,

, from https://pict.sdsu.edu/engauge21st.pdf

Felder, R.M. (2022). Teaching and Learning STEM. [Online]. Retrieved May, 20, 2020, from

https://www.engr.ncsu.edu/stem-resources/legacy-site/learner-centered/

Fusch, P., Fusch, G.E., and Ness L.R. (2018). Denzin’ s paradigm shift: Revisiting

triangulation in qualitative. Journal of Social Change 10(1): 19-32.

Garner, D.L. (2012). The Acquisition of Cultural Competence: A Phenomenological

Inquiry Highlighting the Processes, Challenges and Triumphs of Counselor

Education Student. University of Nevada, United States.

Hurt, J.A., Thibodeau, S.A., Hirsh, A.S., Pabo, C.O., and Joung, J.K. (2003). “Highly specific

zinc finger proteins obtained by directed domain shuffling and cell-based

selection.” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. Unit. States Am 100(21): 12271-12276.

International Society for Technology in Education Students. (2007). ISTE students

standards. [Online]. Retrieved May, 20, 2017, from https://www.iste.org/docs/pdfs/20-14_ISTE_Standards-S_PDF.pdf

Kasetsart University Demonstration School Kamphaeng Saen Campus. (2020). Educational

Institutions According to the Core Course of Basic Education Year 2008. Nakhon

Pathom. (in Thai)

Lock, L., & Natalie, N. (2020). “Applying partial least squares structural equation

modeling (PLS-SEM) in an investigation of undergraduate students’ learning

transfer of academic English.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes 46. 100884.

Lynch, D.E. (2012). Preparing Teachers in Times of Change: Teaching Schools, New Content and Evidence. Tarragindi: Primrose Hall Publishing Group.

Maya, U., Miri, B., and Hossam, H. (2021). “Online vs. on-campus higher education:

Exploring innovation in students' self-reports and students' learning products.”

Thinking Skills and Creativity. 42. 100965.

Office of the National Economic and Social Development Board. (2016). National Economic

and Social Development Plan No.12 (2017-2021). Bangkok: Office of the National

Economic and Social Development Board. (in Thai)

Office of the National Economic and Social Development. (2019). Master Plan under the

National Strategy (23) Research and Development of Innovation (2018 - 2037).

[Online]. Retrieved from Jan, 20, 2020 from shorturl.at/eqKW0 (in Thai)

Shenker, J.I., Goss, S.A., and Bernstein, D.A. (1996). Instructor’s Resource Manual for

Psychology: Implementing Active Learning in the Classroom. [Online]. Retrieved Jan, 5, 2020, from http://s.psych/uiuc,edu/~jskenker/active.html.

Sliwka, A. (2003). Networking for Educational Innovation: A Comparative Analysis,

Published in Networks of Innovation, OECD/CERI. [Online]. Retrieved October, 1, 2014, from shorturl.at/qFKL0

Smith, R., and Lynch, S. (2010). Rethinking Teacher Education: Teacher Education in the Knowledge Age. Sydney: AACLM Press.

Stanford Teaching Commons. (2015). Course Design Overview. [Online]. Retrieved Jan, 5, 2020,

from https://teachingcommons.stanford.edu

Thailand Development Research Institute. (2014). The Preparation of Basic Education

Reform Strategies to Create Accountability. Thailand Development Research

Institute: Bangkok. (in Thai)

The Demonstration School of Nakhon Pathom Rajabhat University. (2020). Philosophy,

Vision, Mission. [Online]. Retrieved Jan, 20, 2020, from http://st.npru.ac.th/index.php/login/2014-05-29-06-26-44 (in Thai)

The Demonstration School of Silpakorn University. (2020). Philosophy, Vision,

Mission. [Online]. Retrieved Jan, 20, 2020, from

http://www.satit.su.ac.th/home/index.php/2017-05-31-04-41-62/2017-07-02-04-09-39

(in Thai)

The Partnership for 21st Century Learning (2017). Framework for 21st Century

Learning. [Online]. Retrieved May, 20, 2017, from, http://www.p21.org/our-work/p21-

framework.

Wood, K. (2008). “Mathematics through Movement: An Investigation of the Links between

Kinaesthetic and Conceptual Learning”. Australian Primary Mathematics Classroom

(1): 18-22.