The Moral Person in the Mind of Generation Z Adolescents: A Study of Mental Representation and Salient Moral Traits

Main Article Content

Naruemon Pititanun
Numchai Supparekchaisakul

Abstract

This study aims to explore the mental representation of moral identity and the salient moral traits of Generation Z adolescents within the context of Thai society. Employing a qualitative research methodology, the study utilized in-depth interviews with five high school students aged 12–18 years (grades 7–12) in Bangkok, purposively selected as key informants. These students were identified based on their demonstrable prosocial behavior, as recognized by those around them, to ensure the inclusion of adolescents who exhibit actual moral behavior. Secondary informants included five parents and five teachers from the same schools. Data collection was conducted using semi-structured interview questions. Content analysis was employed with data triangulation to ensure reliability by integrating information from multiple sources, including secondary informants. Data accuracy was further validated through member checks, where feedback from informants was obtained to confirm the correctness of the data. The findings indicate that the mental representation of moral identity among Generation Z adolescents is characterized by flexibility and situational adaptation, rather than strict adherence to fixed moral principles. However, these adolescents remain committed to core values instilled by family, school, religion, and social media. Eight salient moral traits were identified: avoiding harm to others, being public-minded, adhering to religious principles, helping others, respecting and listening to others, showing kindness, demonstrating compassion, and prioritizing the common good over personal interests.

Article Details

How to Cite
Pititanun, N., & Supparekchaisakul, N. . (2026). The Moral Person in the Mind of Generation Z Adolescents: A Study of Mental Representation and Salient Moral Traits. Thammasat Journal, 45(1), 44–65. retrieved from https://so05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/tujo/article/view/275566
Section
บทความวิจัย

References

ดวงเดือน พันธุนาวิน (2538). ทฤษฎีต้นไม้จริยธรรม: การวิจัยและการพัฒนาบุคคล. โครงการส่งเสริมเอกสารวิชาการ สถาบันบัณฑิตพัฒนบริหารศาสตร์.

สำนักงานคณะกรรมการการศึกษาขั้นพื้นฐาน กระทรวงศึกษาธิการ. (2552). แนวทางการพัฒนาการวัดและประเมิน ลักษณะอันพึงประสงค์ ตามหลักสูตรแกนกลางการศึกษาขั้นพื้นฐาน พุทธศักราช 2551. โรงพิมพ์ชุมนุมสหกรณ์การเกษตรแห่งประเทศไทย จำกัด.

สำนักงานคณะกรรมการยุทธศาสตร์ชาติ. (2561). ยุทธศาสตร์ชาติ 2561-2580. ราชกิจจานุเบกษา, 135(82), 35-43.

Aquino, K., & Reed II, A. (2002). The self-importance of moral identity. Journal of personality and social psychology, 83(6), 1423. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-3514.83.6.1423

Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual review of psychology, 52(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1

Blasi, A. (1983). Moral cognition and moral action: A theoretical perspective. Developmental review, 3(2), 178-210. https://doi.org/10.1016/0273-2297(83)90029-1

Blasi, A. (2005). Moral character: A psychological approach. In D.K. Lapsley & F. C. Power (Eds.), Character psychology and character education (pp. 67-100). University of Notre Dame Press.

Burke, P. J., & Franzoi, S. L. (1988). Studying situations and identities using experiential sampling methodology. American Sociological Review, 559-568. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095849

Damon, W., & Hart, D. (1992). Self-understanding and its role in social and moral development. In M. H. Bornstein & M. E. Lamb (Eds.), Developmental psychology: An advanced textbook (3rd ed., p. 421-464). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Eisenberg, N., Guthrie, I. K., Murphy, B. C., Shepard, S. A., Cumberland, A., & Carlo, G. (1999). Consistency and development of prosocial dispositions: A longitudinal study. Child development, 70(6), 1360-1372. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467- 8624.00100

Erikson, E. H. (1994). Identity and the life cycle. WW Norton & company.

Farrell, W. C., & Phungsoonthorn, T. (2020). Generation Z in Thailand. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 20(1), 25-51. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470595820904116

Hardy, S. A., Krettenauer, T., & Hunt, N. (2020). Moral identity development. The Oxford handbook of moral development: An interdisciplinary perspective, (p.128-144). Oxford University Press.

Jia, F., & Krettenauer, T. (2017). Recognizing moral identity as a cultural construct. Frontiers in psychology, 8, 237346. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00412

Kohlberg, L. (1981). Essays on moral development. Harper & Row.

Krettenauer, T. (2022). When moral identity undermines moral behavior: An integrative framework. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 16(3), e12655. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12689

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications.

Ma, H. K. (1988). The Chinese perspectives on moral judgment development. International, Journal of Psychology, 23(1-6), 201-227. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207598808247761

Markus, H. & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Sage Publications, Inc.

Monin, B., & Jordan, A. H. (2009). The dynamic moral self: A social psychological perspective. Personality, identity, and character: Explorations in moral psychology, 341-354. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1017/CBO9780511627125.016

Piaget, J. (1981). Intelligence and affectivity: Their relationship during child development. Annual Reviews Inc.

Vitell, S. J., Bing, M. N., Davison, H. K., Ammeter, A. P., Garner, B. L., & Novicevic, M. M. (2009). Religiosity and moral identity: The mediating role of self-control. Journal of Business Ethics, 88, 601-613. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1007/s10551-008-9980-0

Stets, J. E., & Carter, M. J. (2006). The moral identity: A principle level identity. Purpose meaning, and action: Control systems theories in sociology, 293-316. https://doi.org/10.1177/0190272511407621

Stets, J. E., & Carter, M. J. (2012). A theory of the self for the sociology of morality. American Sociological Review, 77(1), 120-140. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1177/0003122411433762

Stryker, S. (1980). Symbolic interactionism: A social structural version. Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Company.