Driving the Community Economy through Community-Based Tourism in Ban Mae Mae, Chiang Dao, Thailand: Linkages to the UNESCO Doi Chiang Dao Biosphere Reserve
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research has 3 objectives: (1) To study the community context, situation, trends and tourism resources management in the Ban Mae Mae. (2) To assess the potential of tourism attraction management and the potential of community tourism management in Ban Mae Mae, and (3) study problems, threat and suggestions for guidelines to driving the community economy based on sustainable community tourism in Ban Mae Mae. Chiang Dao District Chiang Mai Province linked it to the Doi Chiang Dao World Biosphere Reserve of UNESCO. Using a mixed research methodology. Collected qualitative and quantitative data. With a focus group, In-depth interview, Observe and evaluate the potential of tourism destination management with those involved. and assessment of tourist destination potential from a sample group of Thai and foreign tourists. Data were analyzed using content analysis. and statistical analysis.
From the study, it was found that the context of Ban Mae Mae community, Village No. 11, Mae Na Subdistrict, Chiang Dao District, Chiang Mai Province, is an old community where people have settled for more than 200 years, with an elevation of approximately 1,200 meters above mean sea level. The majority of the population is Thai Yuan (Yonok or Muang) and Lahu ethnic group, numbering 601 peoples, totaling 206 households. The economic structure has income from agriculture. The community has a socieo – cultural of kinship, relying on each other through agricultural practices. The situation and trend of tourism in Ban Mae Mae is likely to increase from the statistics of the number of tourists after the outbreak of the COVID-19 virus in 2023, the number of tourists during the tourist season, November-January 2024.The hotel is fully booked every day, with 80% of its rooms being Thai tourists and 20% being foreign tourists from Europe and Asia, particularly Japan. The management of tourism resources in Ban Mae Mae can be divided into two types: (1) resources within the community used to manage tourism, including (1.1) wooden houses, Lanna architecture, (1.2) natural resources, (1.3) culture, (1.4) local wisdom in basketry, and (1.5) agricultural ways of life. (2) External community resources used to manage tourism in Ban Mae Mae include (2.1) Doi Luang Chiang Dao and (2.2) San Pa Kia Highland Agricultural Research Station. Community resource management for tourism in Ban Mae Mae has two main formats: (1) homestay accommodation and (2) nature trail tourism (hiking), total distance 3.5 kilometers, time 4 hours.
The overall potential for managing tourist attractions in Ban Mae Mae, has an average value of 3.99, with high potential. Tourist attraction management has the highest average value of 4.08, followed by tourism development planning, with an average value of 4.02. providing new tourist attractions, tourism marketing, and seeking and creating new tourist attractions had similar mean scores of 3.96, 3.95, and 3.93, respectively, all of which had high potential. The potential of tourism management from the opinions of Thai tourists, overall the potential is at a high level, with an average total score of 4.03, with tourist attractions having the highest average total score of 4.60. The potential of tourism management from the opinions of foreign tourists is overall at a moderate level, with an average total score of 3.35. Tourist attractions have the highest average total score of 4.50 showing high potential.
Problems and threat in driving the community economy based on sustainable community tourism in Ban Mae Mae, linked to the UNESCO Doi Chiang Dao World Biosphere Reserve include: (1) Tourists drive their own cars to visit, resulting in insufficient parking in the community. (2) Tourist waste management: There are insufficient trash cans. Tourists litter inappropriately and throw trash into the Mae Mae River. (3) The road is narrow, making it difficult to travel when cars pass each other, which increases the risk of accidents while traveling. (4) There is insufficient parking in the community. Parking for homestay accommodations should be increased. (5) Preventing outside investors from coming to set up resorts and homestays in the community.
Guidelines for driving the community economy based on sustainable community tourism in Ban Mae Mae, linked to the UNESCO Doi Chiang Dao World Biosphere Reserve include: (1) Community transportation management by allowing tourists to use community pick-up and drop-off services. (2) Creation of a learning center on natural resources and forests linked to the UNESCO Doi Chiang Dao World Biosphere Reserve. (3) Community waste management and adding sufficient trash cans in the community; (4) Improving and expanding narrow routes to make travel convenient and safe; and (5) Establishing guidelines to prevent outside investors from setting up resorts and homestays in the community.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright
Connexion: Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences has an exclusive right to publish the accepted articles in any form. However, the author retains the following rights:
1. The right to the ownership of the article;
2. The right to use all or part of the article in his/her other works;
3. The right to re-produce the article for personal use or for use in the author’s organisation, in which case the author must obtain permission from Connexion: Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences;
4. The right to make copies of all or part of the work for educational use or for the author’s use in classroom teaching; and
5. The right to include the work (both the preprinted and printed versions) in an institutional repository.
References
Chantanee, A., Sankasem, J., Laohanun, S., & Sornkaew, U. (2002) Business research (การวิจัยทางธุรกิจ), Phithak Aksorn. (in Thai)
Chittangwattana, B. (1999) Sustainable tourism development planning (การวางแผนพัฒนาการท่องเที่ยวอย่างยั่งยืน), Faculty of Humanities, Chiang Mai University. (in Thai)
Choi, H. S. C., & Sirakaya, E. (2006) Sustainability indicators for managing community tourism, Tourism Management, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 1274–1289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2005.05.018
Choibamroong, T. (2009) International Thai Tourism Journal (วารสารวิชาการการท่องเที่ยวไทยนานาชาติ), Thailand Science Research and Innovation. (in Thai)
Collier, A., & Harraway, S. L. (1997) Principles of tourism, Longman Paul Ltd.
Department of Tourism. (2013) Thai tourism standards: Criteria and conditions for evaluating and certifying establishments according to Thai tourism standards (มาตรฐานการท่องเที่ยวไทย: หลักเกณฑ์และเงื่อนไขการประเมินและการรับรองสถานประกอบการตามมาตรฐานการท่องเที่ยวไทย), Office of Printing Affairs of the War Veterans Organization under Royal Patronage. (in Thai)
GLOBE. (1990) An action strategy for sustainable tourism, Tourism Canada.
Longpan, P., & Kamyuang, S. (2021) UNESCO declares “Doi Chiang Dao” as a new biosphere reserve of the world (ยูเนสโกประกาศให้ “ดอยเชียงดาว” เป็นพื้นที่สงวนชีวมณฑลแห่งใหม่ของโลก), International Cooperation Group, Foreign Relations Division, Office of the Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Education. (in Thai)
Muneenam, U., & Srichu, P. (2009) Participation model and community-based tourism marketing plan of palm, paddy and sea, Sathing Phra district, Songkhla province, Thailand (รูปแบบการมีส่วนร่วมของประชาชนและแผนการตลาดในการจัดการท่องเที่ยวโดยชุมชนวิถีโหนด-นา-เล อำเภอสะทิงพระ จังหวัดสงขลา: รายงานวิจัยฉบับสมบูรณ์), Thailand Science Research and Innovation. (in Thai)
Municipality of Mae Na Subdistrict. (2021, March 5) Duplicated document of Ban Mae Mae Village Development Plan, 2021 (เอกสารอัดสำเนาแผนพัฒนาหมู่บ้าน ประจำปี พ.ศ. 2564 บ้านแม่แมะ หมู่ 11 ตำบลแม่นะ อำเภอเชียงดาว จังหวัดเชียงใหม่), Mae Na Subdistrict Municipality, Chiang Dao District, Chiang Mai Province. (in Thai)
Nonsiri, P. (2007) Rural tourism development in Thailand: Knowledge transfer from experiences in France (การพัฒนาการท่องเที่ยวชนบทของประเทศไทย: การถ่ายทอดองค์ความรู้จากประสบการณ์ในประเทศฝรั่งเศส), International Thai Tourism Journal, no. 2, pp. 164-182. (in Thai)
Phongwiritthon, R., & Pakvipas, P. (2015) The need of Mae Mae Villagers participation in ecotourism management of Mae Na sub district, Chiang Dao district, Chiang Mai province (ความต้องการมีส่วนร่วมในการจัดการท่องเที่ยวเชิงนิเวศของชาวชุมชนแม่แมะ ตำบลแม่นะ อำเภอเชียงดาว จังหวัดเชียงใหม่), Panyapiwat Journal, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 51-62. https://so05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/pimjournal/article/view/44418 (in Thai)
Phuwanatwichit, T. (2010) Integrated tourism development strategy along the R3A strategic route (Chiang Rai-Kunming) (ยุทธศาสตร์การพัฒนาการท่องเที่ยวเชิงบูรณาการบนเส้นทางยุทธศาสตร์ R3A (เชียงราย-คุณหมิง)), Doctoral dissertation in Social Sciences, Mae Fah Luang University. (in Thai)
Phuwanatwichit, T. (2017) Sustainable community resource management (การจัดการทรัพยากรชุมชนอย่างยั่งยืน), Faculty of Humanities, Chiang Mai University. (in Thai)
Ratanapeantamma, W., Chan-uam, D., Chotikunakorn, N., Pairojkul, C., & Kaewsiwawong, C. (2007) Community-based tourism management: A case study of Tha Kha community, Amphawa district, Samut Songkhram province (การจัดการการท่องเที่ยวโดยชุมชน ศึกษากรณี: ชุมชนท่าคา อำเภออัมพวา จังหวัดสมุทรสงคราม), Krirk University. (in Thai)
Sarobol, S. (2003) Community-based tourism: Concepts and experiences in the northern region (การท่องเที่ยวโดยชุมชน: แนวคิดและประสบการณ์พื้นที่ภาคเหนือ), Thailand Research Fund. (in Thai)
Srisa-at, B. (1998) Statistical methods for research, volume 1 (วิธีการทางสถิติสำหรับการวิจัย เล่ม 1), 5th edition, Suweeriyasarn. (in Thai)
Suwan, M. (1998) Tourism administration and management in the areas under the responsibility of the Subdistrict Administrative Organization (SAO) and Subdistrict Council (SAO) (การบริหารและจัดการการท่องเที่ยว ในพื้นที่รับผิดชอบขององค์การบริหารส่วนตำบล (อบต.) และสภาตำบล (สต.), Human and Environmental Management Study Project, Chiang Mai University; Damrong Rajanubhab Institute. (in Thai)
Tourism Development Office. (2003) Guidelines for tourist attraction management (แนวทางบริหารจัดการแหล่งท่องเที่ยว), Department of Tourism. (in Thai)