Evaluating the achievement for the efficiency production of Chiang Mai farmers

Authors

  • Wirasak Somyana คณะวิทยาการจัดการ มหาวิทยาลัยราชภัฏเชียงใหม่

Keywords:

Potentiality of agricultural community, Increasing the efficiency of the production, Compete in ASEAN community

Abstract

This  research  aims to study and develop the potentialities for increasing the production of Chiang Mai agricultural products communities  to compete in ASEAN community. Sample consisted of 14 groups of agriculturists Participatory action research, SWOT analysis and Michael E. Porter’ Diamond Model were used to evaluate the achievement. The study found that the strengths of agricultural communities were that their products have good quality and have market support. Their weaknesses were that products were only needs in communities, markets have no varieties . However, a lot  of organizations helped and supported them both knowledge and budgets. The threats were that markets have high competitions. Guidelines to increase the efficiency of agricultural products’ production were as follow; 1) use resources efficiently 2) plan and control the production systematically 3) select appropriated  resources with production 4) form and establish networks of agriculture 5) make the farm accounting and 6) seek for knowledge to increase the efficiency of production continuously.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Brian A. Keating and group. (2009). Eco-efficient Agriculture: Concepts, Challenges, and Opportunities. Vol. 50. No. Supplement_1, p. S-109-S-119: Crop Science Society of America.
Chiangmai Province. (2016). Strategic Plan for Chiang Mai Development. (Online). Avaiable: http://www.chiangmai.go.th/managing/public/document_list/2?
Dongpo Li, Shigryoshi Takeuchi and Teruaki Nanseki. (2012). Measurement of Agricultural Production Efficiency and the Determinants in China Based on a DEA Approach: A Case Study of 99 Farms from Hebei Province. Kyushu University: Japan.
Herbert A. Simon. (1960). Administrative Bahavior. New York: McMillet Company. Hills, California: Sage Publications, Inc.
Intira moongmuang and Boonsom Waraaegsiri. (2016). The Pattern of Factors Contributing to the Success of Organic Thai Jasmine Rice Growers in Chiang Rai, Phayao, and Chiang Mai Provinces. Journal of Management Science Chiangrai Rajabhat University. 12(1). 117-140
Jiraporn Palee, Kamol Ngamsomsuke and Yaovarate Chaovanapoonphol. (2012). Technical efficiency analysis of glutinous rice production in Hang Dong and San Pa Tong Districts, Chiang Mai. Theses. Chiang Mai: Chiang Mai University.
John D. Millet. (1954). Management in the Public Service. New York: McGraw Mill Book Company.
L.O. Akhilomen and group. (2015). Economic Efficiency Analysis of Pineapple Production in Edo State, Nigeria: A Stochastic Frontier Production Approach. American Journal of Experimental Agriculture, ISSN: 2231-0606,Vol.: 5, Issue.: 3.
Michael E. Porter. (1990). The Competitive Advantage of Nations: With a new Introduction. New York. USA. Free Press.
Nuntiya Hutanuwatr. (2003). SWOT Strategic Business Planning. Faculty of Agriculture Ubon Ratchathani University Local Development Institute.
Office of Agricultural Economic. (2011). Study on soybean production efficiency. Aricultural Economic research No.103. Ministry of Agricultural and Cooperatives.
Office of Agricultural Economic. (2017). Situation of important agricultural products and trends for 2017. Ministry of Agricultural and Cooperatives. Retrieved November 20, 2017, from: http://www.oae.go.th/download/document_tendency/agri_situation2560 .pdf.
Office of The National Economic and Social Development Board. (2017). GDP in Q3/2017 and trends in 2017 – 2018. Retrieved November 20, 2017, from: http://www.nesdb.go.th/ewt_dl_link.php?nid=5165
Pornchai Jedaman. (2013). Human Resource Management using with your Heart and your Brian. Bangkok: Soutpaisal building.
Supsi Suwankesorn. (2013). A study on Efficiency of factor utilixation in ASEAN Countries By Using Data Envelopment Analysis Technique. Faculty of Hamanities and Social Sciences. Chonburi: Burapha University.
The Agricultural Reform Steering subcommittee and National Reform Council. (2016). Reform of agriculture in Thailand the Agricultural Reform Steering subcommittee National Reform Council. National Reform Council. Retrieved November 20, 2017,
from:https://www.parliament.go.th/ewtcommittee/ewt/service/more_new s.php?cid=9
The World Bank. (2017). Agriculture value added per worker (constant 2010 US$). (online). Source: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/EA.PRD.AGRI.KD
Wirasak Somyana. (2016). Strategic plan to enhance the ability of Chiang Mai communities in ASEAN Community under the academic collaboration with Chiang Mai Rajabhat University (SCAC-CMRU) Phase 2. Department of Economic: Chiang Mai Rajabhat University.
Yuthapong Pongsakornnoppadon. (2005). Technical efficiency measurement of elementary and secondary schools by Data Envelopment Analysis. Theses master of arts Bangkok: Thammasat University.
Yuwanuck Gulatee. (2005). Improvement of the performance of the auditor ISO / IEC 17021: 2006 Case Study: The Engineering Institute of Thailand Under H.M. The King's Patronage. Bangkok: The Engineering Institute of Thailand Under H.M. The King's Patronage.

Published

2020-06-20

Issue

Section

บทความวิจัย (Research Article)