QUALITY OF WORKING LIFE OF CENTRAL POLICE FORENSIC DIVISION’S POLICE OFFICER, OFFICE OF POLICE FORENSIC SCIENCE
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The objectives of the study on the quality of life for police officers working at the office of Police Forensic Science Central were: (1) to study the level of the quality of the working life of police officers in the Central Forensic Division, Police Forensics Office; (2) to compare the quality of the working lives of police officers at the Central Forensic Division, Police Forensics Office, classified by personal factors. The sample group consisted of 148 police officers from the central forensic department. Data collection was a questionnaire and the statistics used were frequency, percentage, mean, standard deviation, t-Test statistic, and One Way ANOVA LSD value of 0.05.
The results showed that police officers in the Central Forensic Division have a quality of life at work at a moderate level ( = 3.33). The hypothesis testing revealed that different genders and marital status had the same quality of working life at a statistical significance level of 0.05. However, different ages had a different quality of working life at a statistical significance level of 0.05.
The comparison of the democracy within the organization showed that the difference in ages had a different quality of working life at a statistical significance level of 0.05 and the different work experiences did not have a different quality of working life. However, the different work experiences influenced the quality of working life in the democracy within the organization.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Each publish articles were copyright by Phranakorn Rajabhat University
Any contents which appeared in each articles in the journal were authors personal opinion. It did not relate to Phranakorn Rajabhat University and other instructors in the university. Each authors would take responsibility on their articles. If there are any mistake, the authors will take responsibility themselves
References
Charoenporn, W. (2002). Quality of work life of shift workers at the operational level: a case study of Thai Wire and Cable Services Company Limited. (The degree of Master of Public Administration thesis General Administration), Burapha University, in Thai.
Cummins, R.A. (1998). The comprehensive quality of life scale (fifth edition). Proceeding of the First International Conference on Quality of Life in Cities, Singapore,4-6 March : 68.
Kruekampio, D. (2008). Quality of working life Characteristics of an effective leader, organizational culture with the resignation of Ramathbodi Hospital nurses Wichaiyut Hospital and the National Cancer Institute. (The degree of Master of liberal arts). Thammasat University, in Thai.
Hunter, S. (1992). February. Adult day care: Promotion quality of life the elderly. Journal of gerontological Nursing, 18, 17-20.
Huse, E. F., and Cummings, T. G. (1985). Organization Development and Change. St. Paul, MN. New York: West Publishing.
Sapsakulpun, C. (2013). Quality of working life of Bangkok civil servants Bureau of Drainage Operations Department. (The degree of Master of Arts thesis Political Science), Kasetsart University, in Thai.
Senghao, W. (2006). Quality of working life of government officials. Subdistrict Administration, Muang District, Chonburi Province. (The degree of Special Problems Master of Public Administration, Major Local Administration), Burapha University, in Thai.
Thapthawee, S. (2011). Quality of working life of military officers in the Pratuan class: a case study.402th Engineer Battalion. (The degree of Special Problems Master of Public Administration, Branch General Administration), Burapha University, in Thai.
Walton, R.E. (1973). Quality of Working Life: What is it?. Sloan Management Review, 15(1). 11-21.
Walton, R. E. (1975). The Quality of Working Life: Criteria for Quality of Working Life. New York: Free Press.