THE USE OF ONLINE ENGLISH MEDIA TO ENHANCE STUDENTS’ READING ABILITIES AND MOTIVATION WITH KAHOOT GAME IN ENGLISH READING CLASSROOM AT PHRANAKHON RAJABHAT UNIVERSITY
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
บทคัดย่อ
Online learning tools have been prominent in English reading. The developed English reading lessons aimed to increase students’ reading abilities (i.e. reading comprehension) across text types. Moreover, the English reading classroom should be integrated with online learning tools to support learning among EFL learners. Kahoot Game is implemented in English reading classroom in many contexts. It serves as an integral part of online English media in the classroom. The present study aims to compare the reading achievement of students using online English media with those using traditional methods, investigate the efficiency of the online English media following criteria at 80/80, and investigate the levels of English reading motivation. Using several research instruments, e.g., ten online English media lesson plans, an English reading motivation questionnaire, the TOEFL Junior Reading Comprehension Test, Quizzes E1, Post-test E2. The results illustrated that the mean scores of the post-test in both the experimental group and the control group were higher than the pre-test at the significant level of 0.05. Meanwhile, the efficiency of lesson plans in online English media E1/E2 = 85.96/83.08, which was higher than the established E1/E2 (80/80) criteria. Moreover, levels of English reading motivation showed overall at medium level ( = 3.32, S.D. = 0.56).
Article Details
อนุญาตภายใต้เงื่อนไข Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
บทความที่ได้รับการตีพิมพ์เป็นลิขสิทธิ์ของมหาวิทยาลัยราชภัฏพระนคร
ข้อความที่ปรากฏในบทความแต่ละเรื่องในวารสารวิจัยราชภัฏพระนครเล่มนี้เป็นความคิดเห็นส่วนตัวของผู้เขียนแต่ละท่านไม่เกี่ยวข้องกับมหาวิทยาลัยราชภัฏพระนคร และคณาจารย์ท่านอื่นๆในมหาวิทยาลัยฯ แต่อย่างใด ความรับผิดชอบองค์ประกอบทั้งหมดของบทความแต่ละเรื่องเป็นของผู้เขียนแต่ละท่าน หากมีความผิดพลาดใดๆ ผู้เขียนแต่ละท่านจะรับผิดชอบบทความของตนเองแต่ผู้เดียว
เอกสารอ้างอิง
Abusa’aleek, R. A., & Baniabdelrahman, A. A. (2020). The effect of gamification on Jordanian EFL sixth grade students’ reading comprehension. International Journal of Educa-tion and Training (InjET), 6(1), 1-11.
Ahmad, J. (2016). Technology assisted language learning is a silver bullet for enhancing lan-guage competence and performance: A case study.
International Journal of Ap-plied Linguistics and English Literature, 5(7), 118-131.
Altun, M. (2015). The integration of technology into foreign language teaching. International Journal on New Trends in Education & their Implications (IJONTE), 6(1), 29-34.
Anderson, N. (1999). Exploring second language reading: Issues and strategies. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.
Anggeraini, Y., & Afifah, N. (2017). Digital storytelling as a teaching medium in reading class-room. Language Circle: Journal of Language and Literature, 12(1), 83-90.
Bernhardt, E.B. (1991). Reading development in a second language: Theoretical, empirical and classroom perspectives. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Dafei, D. (2007). An exploration of the relationship between learner autonomy and English proficiency. Asian ELT Journal, 24, 1-24.
Figueroa, J. (2015). Using gamification to enhance second language learning. Digital Educa-tion Review, 27(21), 32-54.
Grabe, W. (1991). Current developments in second language reading research. TESOL Quar-terly, 25, 375-406.
Järvinen, A. (2008). Games without frontiers: Theories and methods for game studies and design. Tampere: Tampere University Press.
Korkmaz, S., & Öz, H. (2021). Using Kahoot to improve reading comprehension of English as a foreign language learners. International Online Journal of Education and Teach-ing, 8(2), 1138-1150.
Koul, L. (1984). Methodology of educational research. New Delhi : Vani Education Book.
Krashen, S. D. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. New York: Longman.
Little, D. (2007). The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Perspectives on the making of supranational language education policy. The Modern Language Journal, 91(4), 645-655.
Marsa, S. S., Kuspiyah, H. R., & Agustina, E. (2021). The effect of Kahoot! Game to teaching reading comprehension achievement. Journal of English Teaching, 7(2), 133-149.
McVeigh, J. & Bixby, J. (2024). Skills for success: Reading and writing. 3rd edition. Oxford: Ox-ford University Press.
Mori, S. (2002). Redefining motivation to read in a foreign language. Reading in a Foreign Language, 14(2), 91-110.
Nowak, P. (2022). What are the benefits of reading comprehension? Retrieved from https://irisreading.com/what-are-the-benefits-of-reading-comprehension/ [2024, May 5].
Nuttall, C. (2005). Teaching reading skills in a foreign language. Macmillan.
O’Brien, H. L., & Toms, E. G. (2008). What is user engagement? A conceptual framework for defining user engagement with technology. Journal of the American Society for In-formation Science and Technology, 59(6), 938-955.
Páez-Quinde, C., Iza-Pazmiño, S., Morocho-Lara, D., & Hernández-Domínguez, P. (2021). Gami-fication resources applied to reading comprehension: projects of connection with society case study. In International Conference on Computer Science, Electron-ics and Industrial Engineering (CSEI) (205-218). Cham: Springer International Publish-ing.
Parkay, F.W. & Hass, G. (2000). Curriculum planning. (7th ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Phieanchang, T. (2020). The effects of the COR teaching methodology on EFL students’ reading comprehension. (Master’s thesis). Srinakharinwirot University, Bangkok.
Rumelhart, D.E. (1977). Toward an interactive model of reading. In S. Dornic (Eds.), Attention and performance V7 (573-603). Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Salen, K., & Zimmerman, E. (2004). Rules of play: Game design fundamentals. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Sandhu, R. (2016). What is reading? - Definition & process. Retrieved from https://study.com/academy/lesson/what-is-readingdefinition-process.html [2024, 4 Jan.].
Setiawan, F. (2020). The effectiveness of using Kahoot! as a media to improve students’ reading comprehension in narrative text. RETAIN: Journal of Research in English Language Teaching, 8(3), 115-121.
Siegle, D. (2015). Technology: Learning can be fun and games. Gifted Child Today, 38(3), 192-197.
Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2, 3-10.
Snow, C. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward an R&D program in reading compre-hension. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
Songsiengchai, T. (2010). Strategies in reading online and printed academic texts of English major students of Srinakharinwirot University. (Master’s thesis). Srinakharinwirot University, Bangkok.
Swaffar, J.K., Arens, K.M., & Byrnes, H. (1991). Reading for meaning: An integrated approach to language learning. NJ: Prentice Hall.
Tarigan, H. G. (2008). Membaca: Sebagai Suatu Keterampilan Berbahasa. Edisi Revisi. Ban-dung: Angkasa.
Thanasoulas, D. (2000). Autonomy and learning: An epistemological approach. Applied Semi-otics, 10, 115-131.
Weisfeld, M. (2008). The object-oriented thought process. Pearson Education.
Wells, B. (2011). Frame of reference: Toward a definition of animation. Animation Practice, Process & Production, 1(1), 11-32.
Wibisono, D. (2019). The effects of Kahoot! In teaching reading to tenth grade students. Magis-ter Scientiae, 1(45), 86-105.
Wigfield, A. and Guthrie, J.T. (1997). Relations of children’s motivation for reading to the amount and breadth of their reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(3), 420-432
Zarei, A. A., & Amani, M. A. (2018). The effect of online learning tools on L2 reading comprehension and vocabulary learning. Teaching English as a Second Language Quarterly (Formerly Journal of Teaching Language Skills), 37(3), 211-238.
