SUBJECTIVITY: EPISTIMOLOGY, PARADIGM AND METHOLOGY IN FIELD RESERCH
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Abstract
Philosophy and research paradigms between positivism and naturalism had been arguments or quarrels for a long time because of their different stances of knowledge set in the pursuit of knowledge or truth in the social sciences. This article was compiled to presents the development and knowledge base of both concepts through the objective and subjective methods. However, the main object of this article aimed to present the concept of subjectivity method in order to demonstrate that the paradigm and methodology of studying the social world was complex and indistinguishable connection between the student himself and the world or the subjective itself. This was because of human society was a complex interconnectedness as mentioned. Their behaviors or actions were behind driven by motivation, values and beliefs which would be different for each group of people and society. This also brought about the different definition of social behavior or action. Therefore, an important tool of the study was the need for students to engage themselves closely with phenomena in order to understand and interpret social phenomena.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
เอกสารอ้างอิง
ชาย โพธิสิตา. (2554). ศาสตร์และศิลป์แห่งการวิจัยเชิงคุณภาพ. กรุงเทพมหานคร : อมรินทร์พรินติ้ง.
ไชยรัตน์ เจริญสินโอฬาร. (2551). ภาษากับการเมือง/ความเป็นการเมือง. กรุงเทพมหานคร : โรงพิมพ์มหาวิทยาลัยธรรมศาสตร์.
รัตนา โตสกุล. (2555). เอกสารรวบรวมคำบรรยายรายวิชา การวิจัยภาคสนาม ปรัชญาดุษฎีบัณฑิต สหวิทยาการ. มหาวิทยาลัยธรรมศาสตร์.
Clifford, Geertz. (1973). Thick Description: Toward and Interpretive Theory of Culture.” In The Interpretation of Cultures. New York : Basic Books.
Clifford, James. (1986). Partial Truths” In Writing Culture : The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography. James Clifford and George Marcus : University of California Press.
Hammersley, Martyn and Paul Atkinson. (1991). “What is ethnography” in Ethongraphy: Principle in Practice. London & New York : Routledge.
Rosaldo, Renato. (1993). subjectivity in Social Analysis” In Culture and Truth. The Remaking of Social Analysis : Beacon Press.
Urry, James. (1984). A history of field methods” In Ethongraphic Research : A Guide to General Conduct. R.F. Ellen.
Wangle, John L. (1988). Trauma in the field: reflections on Malinowski fieldwork.” Ethnographers in the Field. Alabama : The University of Alabama Press.
