Development of a Three-Dimensional Multiple-Moving Block Tracking Model (3D-MBTM) for Enhancing Spatial Ability in Early Adolescence

Main Article Content

Poliny Ung
Suchada Kornpetpanee

Abstract

                 The spatial ability is a component of human intelligence and is an essential skill for everyday
life. However, the spatial ability is learned equally by training, especially computer training, although
there are individual differences in this skill. This study aimed to develop a Three-Dimensional
Multiple-Moving Block Tracking Model (3D-MBTM) for enhancing the spatial ability in the early
adolescence, and to investigate the effect of the developed 3D-MBTM by comparing with the
control group. Sixty lower secondary school students in the academic year 2016 from Saensuk
High School took part in the study. They were randomly assigned into two groups (30-experimental
and 30-control groups). The experimental group underwent the 3D-MBTM training through 3D-LED
TV in half an hour per day for 12 days, whereas the control one did not have this experience. The
paper folding & form board test, the card rotations test, and the mental rotations test were used
to collect the data. Data were analyzed by descriptive statistics and MANOVA.
                 The results showed that the 3D-MBTM was consisted of fve steps, that is presentation, indexation,
movement, identifcation, and feedback. After using the 3D-MBTM with the early adolescent, the
results demonstrated that the response accuracy scores on spatial ability test of the experimental
group were signifcantly (p<.05) increased after training and increased more than the control group.
The response time on spatial ability test of the experimental group were signifcantly decreased
after training and decreased more than the control group. In conclusion, the continuous practice
with the 3D-MBTM can enhance the spatial ability in early adolescence.

Article Details

Section
บทความวิจัย (Research Articles)

References

Alloway, T. P., Bibile, V., & Lau, G. (2013). Computerized working memory training: Can it lead to gains in cognitive skills in students? Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 632-638.
Christensen, L. B., John, R. B., & Turner, L. A. (2015). Research method, design, and anlysis (12th ed.).London: Pearson Education.
Christou, C., Jones, K., Pitta-Pantazi, D., Pittalis, M.,Mousoulides, N., Matos, J. F., et al. (2007, February 22-26). Developing student spatial ability with 3D software applications. In 5th Congress of the
European Society for Research in Mathematics Education. Larnaca, Cyprus.
Cohen, C. A., & Hegarty, M. (2014). Visualizing cross sections: Training spatial thinking using interactive animations and virtual objects. Learning and Individual Differences, 33, 63-71.
Ganley, C. M., Vasilyeva, M., & Dulaney, A. (2014). Spatial ability mediates the gender difference in middle school students’ science performance. Child Development, 85(4), 1419-1432.
Gardner, H. (2011). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences (3rd ed.). New York: BasicBooks.
Jahn, G., Wendt, J., Lotze, M., Papenmeier, F., & Huff, M. (2012). Brain activation during spatial updating and attentive tracking of moving targets. Brain and Cognition, 78(2), 105-113.
Joyce, B., Weil, M., & Calhoun, E. (2009). Models of teaching (8th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education.
Kell, H. J., Lubinski, D., Benbow, C. P., & Steiger, J. H. (2013). Creativity and technical innovation: Spatial ability’s unique role. Psychological Science, 24(9),1831-1836.
Kornkasem, S., & Black, J. B. (2015). Formation of spatial thinking skills through different training methods. Cognitive Processing, 16(1), 281-285.
Kosslyn, S. M., Shephard, J. M., & Thompson, W. L. (2007). Spatial processing during mental imagery: A neurofunctional theory. In Mast, F. & Jancke, L.(Eds.), Spatial processing in navigation, imagery
and perception (pp. 1-15). New York: Springer.
National Science Board [NSB]. (2010). Preparing the next generation of stem innovators: Identifying and developing our nation’s human capital. Virginia: National Science Foundation.
Neubauer, A. C., Bergner, S., & Schatz, M. (2010). Twovs. Three-dimensional presentation of mental rotation tasks: Sex differences and effects of training on performance and brain activation.
Intelligence, 38(5), 529-539.
OECD. (2016). Pisa 2015 results in focus. Paris: OECD.
Offce of the National Economic and Social Development Board. (2011). The eleventh national economic and social development plan (2012-2016). Bangkok, Thailand: National Economic and Social
Development Board, Offce of the Prime Minister.
Penphu, W., & Kornpetpanee, S. (2017). Enhancing the visual perception ability of motorcycle taxi riders using 3D motion object tracking training program. Research Methodology & Cognitive
Science, 15(1), 54-64.
Ptito, M., Kupers, R., Lomber, S., & Pietrini, P. (2012). Sensory deprivation and brain plasticity. Neural Plasticity, 2012.
Pylyshyn, Z. W. (2001). Visual indexes, preconceptual objects, and situated vision. Cognition, 80(1-2), 127-158.
Pylyshyn, Z. W., & Storm, R. W. (1988). Tracking multiple independent targets: Evidence for a parallel tracking mechanism. Spatial Vision, 3(3), 179-197.
Rehman, U. A., Kihara, K., Matsumoto, A., & Ohtsuka, S. (2015). Attentive tracking of moving objects in real 3D space. Vision Research, 109, 1-10.
Samsudin, K., Raf, A., & Hanif, A. S. (2011). Training in mental rotation and spatial visualization and its impact on orthographic drawing performance.Educational Technology & Society, 14(1), 179–186.
Schneck, C. M. (2010). A frame of reference for visual perception. In Kramer, P. & Hinojosa, J. (Eds.), Frames of reference for pediatric occupational therapy (3rd ed., pp. 349-389). Hong Kong, China:
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Tanudtanusilp, P., Kornpetpanee, S., & Ruangtip, P. (2017). Increasing spatial recognition ability using three dimensional multiple object tracking (3D-MOT) task for upper secondary school students:
An electroencephalogram study. Research Methodology & Cognitive Science, 15(1), 73-92.
Treisman, A. (2002). Features and objects in visusal processing. In Levitin, D. J. (Ed.), Foundations of cognitive psychology: Core readings (pp. 399-413). Massachusetts: MIT.
Ung, P., Ngowtrakul, B, Chotpradit, R., & Thavornwong, N. (2016). Spatial ability test for upper-elementary school student: Confrmatory factor and normative data analysis. Journal of the Association of
Researchers, 21(2), 48-57.
Uttal, D. H., Meadow, N. G., Tipton, E., Hand, L. L., Alden, A. R., Warren, C., et al. (2013). The malleability of spatial skills: A meta-analysis of training studies. Psychological Bulletin, 139(2), 352-402.
Vasquez, J. A., Sneider, C., & Comer, M. (2013). Stem lesson essentials: Integrating science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Portsmouth, New Hampshire: Heinemann.
Wright, R., Thompson, W. L., Ganis, G., Newcombe, N. S., & Kosslyn, S. M. (2008). Training generalized spatial skills. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15(4), 763-771.
Zhang, X., Koponen, T., Rasanen, P., Aunola, K., Lerkkanen, M. K., & Nurmi, J. E. (2014). Linguistic and spatial skills predict early arithmetic development via counting sequence knowledge. Child Development,
85(3), 1091-1107.