Satisfaction of Large-scale Rice farmers with Services provided by Agricultural office District in Lam Luk Ka, Pathum Thani province, Thailand
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research aimed to study the satisfaction of large-scale rice farmers with the services of the Lam Luk Ka District Agricultural Office, Pathum Thani Province. Data were collected from 96 farmers using a questionnaire. Descriptive statistics were analyzed, including frequency, percentage, mean, and standard deviation. Hypotheses were tested using the t-Test and F-Test. The results of the study found that the sample group was mostly male, married, 51-60 years old, completed primary education, and had 5-6 household members. Other occupations were business owners or private traders. Income from rice farming is 200,001-300,000 baht per year. They have rice farming experience of 26-30 years. Farmers prefer to grow Khao Khao 41 rice at 33.33 percent. The results of the study of farmers' satisfaction with the services of the Lam Luk Ka District Agricultural Office found that farmers were most satisfied in all aspects, including 1) personnel (average 4.49), 2) service procedures (average 4.48), 3) physical characteristics of the Lam Luk Ka District Agricultural Office (average 4.27), and 5) technology and information (average 4.43). The results of the hypothesis testing found that large-scale rice farmers who engaged in other occupations alongside rice farming had significantly different satisfaction with the services of the Lam Luk Ka District Agricultural Office at a statistical level of 0.05.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Bank of Thailand. (2023). Sustainable solutions to Thailand’s household debt problems: Directional paper on the new Thai financial landscape. https://www.bot.or.th/content/dam/bot/financial innovation/sustainable-finance/household-and-sme/2023_DP_Household%20Debt_ENG_final.pdf
Cherlin, A., Chamratrithirong, A. Variations in marriage patterns in central Thailand. (1988). Demography, 25(3), 337–353.https://doi.org/10.2307/2061536
Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334.
Danaawann, W. (2023). The impact of demographic factors and technology adoption on Thai household farm income and productivity. [Doctoral dissertation, Chulalongkorn University]. https://digital.car.chula.ac.th/chulaetd/10756/
Elias, A., Nohmi, M., Yasunobu, K., & Ishida, A. (2016). Farmers’ satisfaction with agricultural extension service
and its influencing factors: A case study in Northwest Ethiopia. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology 18(1), 39-53. https://jast.modares.ac.ir/article_15834.html
Feria, S. G. (2024). Municipal agriculture office services and level of satisfaction of farmer beneficiaries in Santa Marcela, Apayao. ISRG Journal of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences, 2(4), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12679339
Gonzalez, L. M. P. (2025). Scale development and validation for measuring farmer satisfaction with extension service quality attributes. International Journal of Agriculture Extension and Social Development, 8(1), 206–209. https://www.doi.org/10.33545/26180723.2025.v8.i1c.3205
Kookkaew, P. (2019). Cost and return on investment from rice RD41 farming of farmers in Samchuk District, Suphanburi Province, Thailand. International Academic Conference Proceedings. https://ideas.repec.org/p/sek/iacpro/8711206.html
Lam Luk Ka District Agricultural Office. (2024). History of Lam Luk Ka District Agricultural Extension Office. https://pathumthani.doae.go.th/lamlukka/
Mathuabiramia, V., Karthikeyan, C., Mansingh, J. P., Ihoub, A. F. Y., Malliah, N. D., & Ganesan, D. (2024). Assessment of service quality and farmers’ satisfaction of extension and advisory services received from agro-input dealers during COVID-19 in India. Multidisciplinary Science Journal. https://doi.org/10.31893/multiscience.2025191
Ngaejaroenkul, D. (2022). Satisfaction assessment on the services of the Office of the Permanent Secretary for the Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives, Bangkok [Master’s independent study, Ramkhamhaeng University]. https://mmm.ru.ac.th/MMM/IS/twin92/6214154728.pdf
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Office of Agricultural Economics. (2023). Unstable income for Thai rice farmers. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/graphics/THAILAND-RICE/zdvxrxldovx/
Ongachi, W., & Belinder, I. (2025). Is farming income sufficient? The role of agricultural extension in diversifying smallholder livelihoods for sustainable development. International Journal of Agricultural Sciences,10, 1-9.
Patel, R., Kumar, A., & Patel, R. (2026). Social media use in agricultural extension services. Sunshine Agriculture, 6(5), 10–15.
Posthumus, H., Romney, D., Dhamankar, M., Flink, I., Kansiime, M. K., Njunge, R., Silvestri, S., & Kadzamira,
M. A. T. J. (2025). A review on effective and efficient communication in agricultural extension to
enhance adoption of agricultural best practices at scale (CABI Working Paper 35). https://doi.org/10.1079/CABICOMM-62-8186
Samaranjai, J. (2011). Determining the sample size for research. http://dspace.nstru.ac.th:8080/dspace/bitstream/123456789/1580/3/%E0%B9%80%E0%B8%AD%E0%B8%81%E0%B8%AA%E0%B8%B2%E0%B8%A3%E0%B8%AB%E0%B8%A1%E0%B8%B2%E0%B8%A2%E0%B9%80%E0%B8%A5%E0%B8%822.pdf
Shaba, S. A., & Alam, M. M. (2024). Farmers’ satisfaction with agricultural extension: A service quality-based assessment. Indian Journal of Extension Education, 60(3), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.48165/IJEE.2024.60301
Siriwan, P., et al. (2008). Statistics for research. Text and Journal Publication.
Szabo, S., Apipoonyanon, C., Pramanik, M., Tsusaka, T. W., & Leeson, K. (2021). Agricultural productivity, aging farming workforce, sustainable agriculture, and well-being: Household survey data from Central Thailand. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 5, 728120. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2021.728120
Teerachai, S. (2023). Efficiency of rice production and Thai farmers’ poverty. Proceeding of the 7th TICC International Conference 2023 Toward Sustainable Development Goals: Transformation and Beyond.146-159. International College of Digital Innovation, Chiang Mai University. https://ticc.icdi.cmu.ac.th/Files/paper/Paper%2013.pdf
Warr, P., & Suphannachart, W. (2020). Agricultural productivity growth and poverty reduction: Evidence from Thailand. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 72(2), 525-546. https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-9552.12412