Legal Problems Concerning Nominee Arrangement in Relation to Foreign Business under Thai Laws

Main Article Content

Supasit Saypan

Abstract

This article explores the problems of nominee arrangements under the Foreign Business Act B.E. 2542 (hereinafter the “FBA”), which is caused by the impractical definition of “foreigners” under Section 4 of the FBA, and the unclear criteria relating to what constitutes a “nominee arrangement”, which is prohibited under the relevant laws.


Nominee arrangements are a major problem for foreign business laws in Thailand, as they allow foreigners to circumvent laws which aim to protect the economic interests of Thailand against foreign ownership and control, and protect the interests of Thai businesses in sensitive sectors in which Thai businesses may not yet be ready to compete with multinational corporations looking to expand the scope of their business to Thailand.


Despite the laws being effective for over 40 years, the nominee arrangement problem remains a prominent and long standing issue in Thailand, and thus, it is essential to find suitable and practical solutions to fix these problems, with primary focus on revising the definition of “foreigners” and providing a clear criteria to facilitate the identification of a “nominee arrangement” under the FBA respectively. With the implementation of the proposed solutions, nominee arrangements will be eradicated over time, which would result in a more balanced playing field which will both protect Thai businesses and also promote foreign businesses in Thailand.


 

Article Details

Section
Articles

References

Ratanakorn S, Kum Athibai Pramuan Kodmhai Pang Lae Panich Hoonsuan Borisut [Explanation of the Civil and Commercial Code: Companies] (11th edn, Nitibannakarn Publisher 2009) (โสภณ รัตนากร, คำอธิบายประมวลกฎหมายแพ่งและพาณิชย์ หุ้นส่วนบริษัท (สำนักพิมพ์ นิติบรรณการ พ.ศ. 2552 พิมพ์ครั้งที่ 11))

Asawanont A, ‘Kodmhai Karn Prakorb Turakij Kong Kon Tang Daow Gub Nuk Kodmhai’ [Conducting Businesses by Foreigners and Foreign Lawyers] (2007) (New Law Articles) (อธึก อัศวานันท์, “กฎหมายการประกอบธุรกิจของคนต่างด้าว กับนักกฎหมายต่างด้าว” (2550) วารสารข่าวกฎหมายใหม่)

Kijnichcheeva A and Tonguthaisri N, ‘Karn Hai Kwaam Chuaylheu Leu Sanubsanoon Leu Ruemgun Leu Teu Hoon Tan Kon Tang Daow Tarm Matra 36 Hang Por.Ror.Bor. Karn Prakorb Turakit Kong Kon Tang Daow Por.Sor. 2542’ [Assisting, Supporting and Holding Shares on Behalf of Foreigners under Section 36 of the Foreign Business Act B.E. 2542] (Law Articles. Year 28 No. 2) (อนุพันธ์ กิจนิจชีวะ และ นำพล ทองอุทัยศรี, การให้ความช่วยเหลือหรือสนับสนุนหรือร่วมกันหรือถือหุ้นแทนคนต่างด้าว ตามมาตรา 36 แห่ง พ.ร.บ การประกอบธุรกิจของคนต่างด้าว พ.ศ. 2542, (วรสารกฎหมาย ปีที่ 28 ฉบับที่ 2))

Chatchawarl S and Chansilp L, ‘Thai Nominee Shareholders: Aftermath Problem’ (Csbc-Law, 5 August 2010) <http://www.csbc-law.com/thai-law-insights/thai-nominee-shareholders-aftermath-problem.html> accessed 24 July 2019

Lorenz & Partners, ‘Rights and Protection of Minority Shareholders in Thailand’ (Lorenz-partner, May 2017) <https://www.lorenz-partners.com/download/thailand/NL188E-Rights-and-Protection-of-Minority-Shareholders-in-Thailand-May17.pdf> accessed 5 May 2019

Pugnatorious, ‘Seven Deadly Sins: The Status Quo of Thailand’s Foreign Business Act’ (Pugnatorious, 16 October 2019) <https://pugnatorius.com/Foreign Business Act B.E. 2542/> accessed 25 October 2019

Sakon H, ‘Nominee Holding Shares for Foreigners’ (Bangkokbiznewz, 8 March 2016),<https://www.bangkokbiznews.com/blog/detail/637132> accessed 24 September 2019