The Doctrine of Hardship: Extension to the Doctrine of Frustration in Malaysia

Main Article Content

Muhammad Nabil Afham Bin M Fuad

Abstract

The happening of unforeseen events may disrupt parties’ contractual performance. Under Malaysian contract law, the doctrine of frustration relieves parties from their further performance if their obligations have become impossible or when the change of circumstances will warrant a performance so radically different from what was contracted for. However, it may not be sufficient because, at times, such unforeseen circumstances may render parties’ performance, though not impossible, more onerous than what was initially agreed. Thus, the hardship doctrine may supplement the doctrine of frustration by offering remedies to the aggrieved party via, amongst others, renegotiation and alteration of contractual terms, something that the frustration doctrine could not offer.


This article will briefly illustrate how the Malaysian doctrine of frustration operates and how the hardship principle may supplement it as an alternative recourse. Further, analysis on the hardship doctrine will be conducted upon the Italian, German, French and American laws. Reference will also be made to the Principles of European Contract Law 2002 (“PECL”), UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts 2016 (“UNIDROIT Principles”) and the Draft Common Frame of Reference (“DCFR”). Such analysis will focus on the requirements and remedies provided under the hardship doctrine as well as challenges in incorporating the same into Malaysian contract law.

Article Details

Section
Articles

References

Ahmad Alsagoff S, Principles of the Law of Contract in Malaysia (3rd edn, Lexis Nexis 2010)

Alpa G and Zeno-Zencovich V, Italian Private Law (1st edn, Routledge Cavendish 2006)

Brownsword R, Contract Law: Themes for the Twenty-First Century, (2nd edn, Oxford University Press, 2006)

McKendrick E, Contract Law: Texts, Cases and Materials (5th edn, Oxford University Press, 2012)

Baranauskas E and Zapolskis P, ‘The Effect of Change in Circumstances on the Performance of Contract’ (2009) 4(118) Jurisprudence 197

Camero J, ‘Mission Impracticable: The Impossibility of Commercial Impracticability’ (2015) 13(1) The University of New Hampshire Law Review 1

Christine Zaccaria E, ‘The Effects of Changed Circumstances in International Commercial Trade’ (2005) 9 International Trade and Business Law Review 135

Peter Berger K and Behn D, ‘Force Majeure and Hardship in the Age of Corona: A Historical and Comparative Study’ (2019-2020) 6(4) McGill Journal of Dispute Resolution 78

Pietrancosta A, ‘Introduction of the Hardship Doctrine (“théorie de l’imprévision”) into French Contract Law: A Mere Revolution on the Books?’ (2016) 3 RTDF 1

Rosler H, ‘Hardship in German Codified Private Law – In Comparative Perspective to English, French and International Contract Law’ (2007) 15(4) European Review of Private Law 483

Rowan S, ‘The New French Law of Contract’ (2017) 66(4) International and Comparative Law Quarterly 805, 820-821.

Schwenzer I, ‘Force Majeure and Hardship in International Sales Contracts’ (2008) 39 VUWLR 709

French Civil Code 2016

German Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch 2002

Italian Codice Civile 1942

Malaysian Contracts Act 1950

Restatement (Second) of Contracts

Uniform Commercial Code

Abdul Razak bin Datuk Abu Samah v Shah Alam Properties Sdn Bhd [1999] 2 MLJ 500

Aseambankers Malaysia Bhd & Ors v Shencourt Sdn Bhd & Anor [2014] 4 MLJ 619

Asphalt International. Inc. v. Enterprise Shipping Corp. S.A. 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 15322

Bank Islam Malaysia Berhad v Lim Kok Hoe and Anor [2009] 6 MLJ 839

Bende & Sons, Inc. v. Crown Recreation, Inc. 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15119

Ching Yik Development Sdn Bhd v Setapak Heights Development Sdn Bhd [1996] 3 MLJ 675

Dato Yap Peng v Public Bank Bhd [1997] 3 MLJ 484

Eastern Air Lines Inc. v Gulf Oil Corp 1975 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15673

Guan Aik Moh (KL) Sdn Bhd & Anor v Selangor Properties Bhd [2007] 4 MLJ 201

LSSC Development Sdn Bhd v Thomas a/l Iruthayam and Anor [2007] 4 MLJ 1

Sentul Raya Sdn Bhd v Hariram a/l Jayaram & Ors [2008] 4 MLJ 852

Tan Chong & Sons Motor Company (Sdn) Berhad v Alan Mcknight [1983] 1 MLJ 220

Transatlantic Financing Corporation v United States of America 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 6004

Draft Common Frame of Reference

Principles of European Contract Law 2002

UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts 2016

Momberg Uribe R. A., ‘The Effect of a Change of Circumstances on the Binding Force of Contracts: Comparative Perspectives’ (DPhil Thesis, Utrecht University, 2011)

Tuccari E, ‘Change of Circumstances and Judicial Power: A European Perspective of Contract Law’ (The European Conference on Politics, Economics and Law 2015 Official Conference Proceedings, The International Academic Forum, 2015) 6 https://papers.iafor.org/submission17377/

accessed 1 June 2020

Tang A, ‘Malaysia announces movement control order after spike in Covid-19 cases (updated)’ The Star (Kuala Lumpur, 16 March 2020)

thestar.com.my/news/nation/2020/03/16/malaysia-announces-restricted-movement-measure-after-spike-in-covid-19-cases> accessed 12 August 2021

‘The pandemic has caused the price of steel bars and iron to increase in Malaysia’ (Construction +, 3 February 2021) <https://www.construction

plusasia.com/my/the-pandemic-has-caused-the-price-of-steel-bars-and-iron-to-increase-in-malaysia/> accessed 18 August 2021