Consumers Right to Repair Defective Electronic Products

Main Article Content

Atijit Kururatchaikul

Abstract

Currently, the manufacturers attempt to restrict the owners and third-party repair shops from repairing electronic products, such as specifying the terms under warranty and limiting spare parts. Therefore, the consumers have been forced to receive authorised service only. The manufacturer will not provide the spare parts and essential information to be able to repair by owners and third-party repair shops. There are only two choices left, requiring the authorised service provider to repair the product or trashing it. The consumers’ right to repair seems unobvious in Thailand because Thai Civil and Commercial Code and Thai regulations relating to consumer protection do not specify the right to repair. Consumers have to spend more money on repair services of the manufacturer. The study mainly analyses relevant laws of the United States: the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act and the Fair repair Act. The study finds that Thailand should adopt the right to repair to protect consumers from unfair practices. Therefore, the article would like to propose the new regulation and provisions which protect the consumer from the unfair practice of manufacturers. Firstly, the regulation should mandate the manufacturers to distribute the spare parts, equipment and information at “the equitable price”. The manufacturer has to consider the ability of users and repair shops to afford the parts, equipment, or guidance information. Secondly, the regulation shall provide a specific provision to prevent consumers from unfair terms. For example, the manufacturer shall not specify the warranty clauses that compel the consumer to receive only the manufacturer’s service.

Article Details

Section
Articles

References

Supanit S, Kham Athibai Kotmai Khumkhrong Phuboriphok [Commentary on Consumer Protection Law], (6th edn, Chulalongkorn, 2551) (สุษม ศุภนิตย์, คำอธิบายกฎหมายคุ้มครองผู้บริโภค, (พิมพ์ครั้งที่ 6, จุฬาลงกรณ์มหาวิทยาลัย 2551)).

Thanitkul S, Naeokhit Lak Kotmai Lae Khamphiphaksa Kotmai Thurakit [Concept, Legal Principal, and Court Decision Relating to Business Laws] (4th edn, Nititham, 2557) (ศักดา ธนิตกุล, แนวคิด หลักกฎหมาย และคำพิพากษา กฎหมายธุรกิจ, (พิมพ์ครั้งที่ 4, นิติธรรม 2557)).

Wongwattanasarn C, Kotmai Khumkhrong Phuboriphok [Consumer Protection Law], (Winyuchon 2543) (ชัยวัฒน์ วงศ์วัฒนศานต์ม กฎหมายคุ้มครองผู้บริโภค (วิญญูชน 2543)).

Daniel A. Hanley, Claire Kelloway & Sandeep Vaheesan, Fixing America: breaking manufacturers’ aftermarket monopoly and restoring consumers’ right and repair (openmarketsinstitute, April 2020).

Nixing the Fix: An FTC Report to Congress on Repair Restrictions, (Federal trade Commission of the United States of America, May 2021).

Adam Lella, ‘U.S. Smartphone Penetration surpassed 80 percent in 2016’ (COMSCORE 3 Febuary 2017), <http://www.comscore.com/Insites/blog/US-Smartphone-Penetration-Surpassed-80-Percent-in-2016> accessed 24 August 2021.

Apple Inc., ‘Apple Warranty’ (Apple 11 March 2021) <https://www.apple.com/legal/warranty/products/warranty-edition-row-english.html> accessed 24 August 2021.

McDermott Will & Emery, ‘FTC Looks to Fix Repair Restrictions’, (Antitrust Alert, 3 August 2021), <https://www.antitrustalert.com/2021/08/ftc-looks-to-fix-repair-restrictions/> accessed 19 March 2022.

Consumer Protection Act (Issue No. 2) B.E. 2541

Fair Repair Act, H.R.4006, 17th Congress (2021-2022)

Magnuson-Moss warranty Act of the United States