An Analysis of the Real Interest Rate and Monetary Policy under Regime Shifts

Authors

  • Pym Manopimoke Department of Economics, University of Washington

Keywords:

Nonstationary series, real interest rate, unit root, stochastic process, vector autoregressions, monetary policy

Abstract

The real interest rate plays a central role in macroeconomic theory and the transmission mechanism of monetary policy. This paper extends Garcia and Perron’s (1996) time series analysis of the U.S. real interest rate to better understand its dynamics over the postwar period.
Using a three-state Markov Switching model and a Hamilton filter estimation approach, the means and variances of the real interest rate series are found to be different over the time periods 1954-1973, 1973-1981, 1981-1986, 1986-2002, and 2002-2006. To examine whether a change in the conduct of monetary policy might have been the major driving force behind these shifts in the real interest rate series, a three-variable recursive Vector Autoregression (VAR) model comprising of the unemployment rate, price inflation and the short term interest rate is used to examine the nature of monetary policy over the five different time periods. Based on the impulse response analyses of the VAR, we cannot conclude that monetary policy is the main determinant behind real interest rate fluctuations. As shifts in preferences and technology have been suggested to affect the dynamics of the real interest rate as well, a joint investigation of the real interest rate, monetary policy, and output trend growth rate might be able to better explain the causes for regime shifts in the U.S. real interest rate.

References

1. Alogoskoufis, G., and Smith, R. (1991) The Phillips Curve, the Persistence of Inflation, and theLucas Critique: Evidence from Exchange Rate Regimes, American Economic Review, 81, pp. 1254 – 1275.
2. Balke, N., and Emery, K. (1994) The Federal Funds Rate as an Indicator of Monetary Policy:Evidence from the 1980s, Economic Review (First Quarter).
3. Ball, L. (1990) Time-Consistent Policy and Persistent Changes in Inflation, NBER WorkingPaper Series, No. 3528 (Cambridge, Mass.: National Bureau of Economic Research, December).
4. Bernanke, B., and Blinder, A. (1990) On the Predictive Power of Interest Rates and Spreads, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston New England Economic Review, November/December, pp. 51-68.
5. (1992) The Federal Funds Rate and the Channels of Monetary Transmission, American Economic Review 82 (September), pp. 901-921.
6. Bollerslev, T. (1988) Integrated ARCH and Cointegration in Variance, mimeo, Northwestern University.
7. Bosworth, B. (1989) Institutional Change and the Efficacy of Monetary Policy, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, no. 1, pp. 77-110.
8. Fama, E. (1975) Short-term Interest Rates as Predictors of Inflation, American Economic Review 65, pp. 269-282.
9. Garcia, R., and Perron, P. (1996) An Analysis of the Real Interest Rate under Regime Shifts, The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 78, No. 1. (February), pp. 111-125.
10. Goodfriend, M. (1992) Interest Rate Policy and the Inflation Scarce Problem: 1979-1992, Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond 1992 Annual Report, pp. 7-19.
11. Hamilton, J. (1989) A New Approach to the Economic Analysis of Nonstationary Time Series and the Business Cycle, Econometrica 57, pp. 357-384.
12. Huizinga, J., and Mishkin, F. (1986) Monetary Policy Regime Shifts and the Unusual Behavior of the Real Interest Rates, Carnegie-Rochester Conference on Public Policy 24, pp. 231-274.
13. Kahn, G. (1989) The Changing Interest Sensitivity of the U.S. Economy, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, Economic Review 74 (November), pp. 13-34.
14. Laurent, R. (1988) An Interest Rate-Based Indicator of Monetary Policy, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, Economic Perspectives, January/February, pp. 3-14.
15. McCallum, B. (1983) A Reconsideration of Sims’ Evidence Concerning Monetarism, Economics Letters 13 (2-3), pp. 167-71.
16. Perron, P. (1990) Testing for a Unit Root in a Time Series with a Changing Mean, Journal of Business &Economic Statistics 8, pp. 153-162.
17. Romer, C., and Romer, D. (2002) A Rehabilitation of Monetary Policy in the 1950s, NBER Working Paper Series, No. 8800 (Cambridge, Mass.: National Bureau of Economic Research, February).
18. Rose, A. (1988) Is the Real Interest Rate Stable?, Journal of Finance 43, pp. 1095-1112.
19. Sims, C. (1986) Are Forecasting Models Usable for Policy Analysis? Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Quarterly Review 10 (Winter), pp. 2-15.
20. Stock, J., and Watson, M. (2001) Vector Autoregressions, Journal of Economic Perspectives –Volume 15, Number 4, pp. 101-115.
21. Walsh, C. (1987) Three Questions Concerning Nominal and Real Interest Rates, Economic Review Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, No. 4, pp. 5-20.
22. _______(1988) Testing for Real Effects of Monetary Policy Regime Shifts, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, pp. 393-401.

Downloads

Published

2018-07-31

How to Cite

Manopimoke, P. (2018). An Analysis of the Real Interest Rate and Monetary Policy under Regime Shifts. Thailand and The World Economy, 27(2), 1–36. Retrieved from https://so05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/TER/article/view/137187