Beauty Premium through Cosmetic Surgery for Prisoners: Choice Experiment with Asymmetric Information


  • Taksaorn Phuchongpravech Faculty of Economics, Chulalongkorn University, Thailand
  • Thanee Chaiwat Faculty of Economics, Chulalongkorn University, Thailand


asymmetric information, beauty premium, choice experiment, cosmetic surgery, prisoner employment


The concept of ‘beauty premium’ has been the subject of academic research for decades, but only a few studies have investigated the investment side of beauty. Meanwhile, the main concern of prisoners is to be given the opportunity to re-enter society. However, their low physical attractiveness has been claimed to be an obstacle that prevents them from entering the labour market. While a large literature reported the existence of beauty premium in the labour market worldwide, the current paper complements the existing literature by applying choice experiment (CE) with asymmetric information to investigate the impacts of cosmetic surgery on prisoners’ labour market returns: job opportunities and incomes. Eighteen male prisoners’ faces were simulated for cosmetic surgery and assigned as job candidates in a CE. The results show that, compared with the non-surgical group, respondents (employers) in the formal and informal sectors preferred cosmetic surgical groups with odds ratios or increase of utility of 4.05 and 2.54, respectively. The MWTP values show that employers are willing to pay an additional 3,500 baht to the surgical group. Using prisoners as subjects not only broadens existing literature by demonstrating the existence of economic returns to investment on beauty in this minority group, but it also presents additional ideas for further rehabilitation programme to help prisoners reintegrate themselves into society.



Download data is not yet available.


Aizaki, H. (2012). Basic functions for supporting an implementation of choice experiments in R. Journal of Statistical Software, 50(2), 1-24.

Aizaki, H., & Nishimura, K. (2008). Design and analysis of choice experiments using R: Abrief introduction. Agricultural Information Research, 17(2), 86-94

Akerlof, G. A. (1970). The market for “lemons”: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84(3), 488-500.

Arunachalam, R., & Shah, M. (2012). The prostitute’s allure: The return to beauty in commercial sex work. The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 12(1), 1-25.

Azariadis, C. (1983). Employment with asymmetric information. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 98, 157-172.

Bateman, I. J., Carson, R. T., Day, B., Hanemann, W. M., Hanley, N., Hett, T., Lee, M. J., Loomes, G., Mourato, S., Özdemiroglu, E., Pearce, D. W., Sugden, R., & Swanson, J. (2002). Economic valuation with stated preference techniques: A manual. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Borland, J., & Leigh, A. (2014). Unpacking the beauty premium: What channels does it operate through, and has it changed over time? Economic Record, 90(228), 17-32.

Bull, R. (1982). Physical appearance and criminality. Current Psychological Reviews, 2(3), 269-281.

Bull, R. H. C., & Green, J. (1980). The relationship between physical appearance and criminality. Medicine, Science and the Law, 20(2), 79-83.

Carre, J. M., McCormick, C. M., & Mondloch, C. J. (2009). Facial structure is a reliable cue of aggressive behavior. Psychological Science, 20(10), 1194-1198.

Dion, K., Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. (1972). What is beautiful is good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24(3), 285-290.

Feingold, A. (1992). Good-looking people are not what we think. Psychological Bulletin, 111(2), 304-341.

Freedman, A. M., Warren, M. M., Cunningham, L. W., & Blackwell, S. J. (1988). Cosmetic surgery and criminal rehabilitation. Southern Medical Journal, 81(9), 1113-1116.

Hamermesh, D. S., & Abrevaya, J. (2013). Beauty is the promise of happiness? European Economic Review, 64, 351-368.

Hamermesh, D. S., & Biddle, J. E. (1994). Beauty and the labor market. American Economic Review, 84(5), 1174-1194.

Hamermesh, D. S., & Parker, A. (2005). Beauty in the classroom: instructors’ pulchritude and putative pedagogical productivity. Economics of Education Review, 24(4), 369-376.

Hamermesh. D. S., Meng, X., & Zhang, J. (2002). Dress for success—does primping pay? Labour Economics, 9(3), 361-373.

Hanley, N., Mourato, S., & Wright, R. E. (2001). Choice modelling approaches: A superior alternative for environmental valuation? Journal of Economic Surveys, 15(3), 435-462.

Haselhuhn, M. P., & Wong, E. M. (2012). Bad to the bone: Facial structure predicts unethical behaviour. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 279(1728), 571-576.

Huber, J., & Zwerina, K. (1996). The importance of utility balance in efficient choice designs. Journal of Marketing Research, 33(3), 307-317.

Hurwicz, L. (1972). On informationally decentralized systems, eds. by C. B. McGuire & R. Radner in Decision and Organization (pp. 297-336). Amsterdam: North-Holland.

International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. (2018). ISAPS International survey on aesthetic/cosmetic procedure performed in 2017. Retrieved from

King, A., & Leigh, A. (2009). Beautiful politicians. Kyklos, 62(4), 579-593.

Klassen, A., Jenkinson, C., & Fitzpatrick, R. (1996). Patients’ health related quality of life before and after aesthetic surgery. British Journal of Plastic Surgery, 49(7), 433-438.

Krinsky, I., & Robb, A. L. (1986). On approximating the statistical properties of elasticities. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 68(4), 715-719.

Langlois, J. H., Kalakanis, L., Rubenstein, A. J., Larson, A., Hallam, M., & Smoot, M. (2000). Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 126(3), 390-423.

Lee, S., & Ryu, K. (2012). Plastic Surgery: Investment in human capital or consumption? Journal of Human Capital, 6(3), 224-250.

Lerner, R. M., Delaney, M., Hess, L. E., Jovanovic, J., & Eye, A.V. (1990). Early adolescent physical attractiveness and academic competence. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 10, 4-20.

Lewison, E. (1965). An experiment in facial reconstructive surgery in a prison population. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 92(6), 251-254.

Lombroso, C. (1911). Crime, its causes and remedies. Boston: Little, Brown.

Louviere, J. J., Hensher, D. A., & Swait, J. D. (2000). Stated choice methods: analysis and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Mobius, M. M., & Rosenblat, T. S. (2006). Why Beauty Matters. American Economic Review, 96(1), 222-235.

Mocan, N., & Tekin, E. (2010). Ugly criminals. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 92(1), 15-30.

Moran, D. (2012). Prisoner reintegration and the stigma of prison time inscribed on the body. Punishment & Society, 14(5), 564-583.

Moran, D. (2014). Leaving behind the ‘total institution’? Teeth, transcarceral spaces and (re)inscription of the former incarcerated body. A Journal of Feminist Geography, 21(1), 564-583.

National Statistical Office Ministry of Digital Economy and Society. (2018). Retrieved from

Parrett, M. (2015). Beauty and the feast: Examining the effect of beauty on earnings using restaurant tipping data. Journal of Economic Psychology, 49(C), 34-46.

Pfann, G. A., Biddle, J. E., Hamermesh, D. S., & Bosman, C. M. (2000). Business success and businesses’ beauty capital. Economics Letters, 67(2), 201-207.

Póvoa, A. C. S., Pech. W., Viacava. J. J. C., & Schwartz, M. T. (2020). Is the beauty premium accessible to all? An experimental analysis. Journal of Economic Psychology, 78, 102252.

Rankin, M., Borah, G. L., Perry, A. W., & Wey, P. D. (1998). Quality-of-life outcomes after cosmetic surgery. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 102(6), 2139-2145.

Ravina, E. (2008). Love & loans: The effect of beauty and personal characteristics in credit markets. SSRN Working paper No.1101647. Social Science Research Network.

Ruffle, B. J., & Shtudiner, Z. (2015). Are good-looking people more employable? Management Science, 61(8), 1760-1776.

Schuring, A. G. & Dodge E. R. Jr. (1967). The role of cosmetic surgery in criminal rehabilitation. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 40(3), 268-270.

Scholz, J. K., & Sicinski, K. (2015). Facial attractiveness and lifetime earnings: Evidence from a cohort study. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 97(1), 14-28.

Spira, M., Chizen, J. H., Gerow, F. J., & Hardy, S. B. (1966). Plastic surgery in the Texas prison system. British Journal of Plastic Surgery, 19, 364-371.

Paitoonpong, S., & Kulkolkarn, K. (2019) Released prisoners prisoners have no right to earn a living. Retrieved from [in Thai]

Stillman, T. F., Maner, J. K., & Baumeister, R. F. (2010). A thin slice of violence: Distinguishing violent from nonviolent sex offenders at a glance. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31(4), 298-303.

Thaireform (2017). Released prisoners = the ‘new poor people’, waiting for the chance from the society. Retrieved from [in Thai]

Thornton, G. R. (1939). The ability to judge crimes from photographs of criminals: a contribution to technique. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 34(3), 364-371.

Valla, J. M., Ceci, S. J., & Williams, W. M. (2011). The accuracy of inferences about criminality based on facial appearance. Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology, 5(1), 66-91.




How to Cite

Phuchongpravech, T., & Chaiwat, T. (2021). Beauty Premium through Cosmetic Surgery for Prisoners: Choice Experiment with Asymmetric Information. Thailand and The World Economy, 39(1), 39–57. Retrieved from