Science Teacher Professional Development Program through Lesson Study: Case of Thailand Demonstration School

Main Article Content

Pratuengsook Maneelam

Abstract

The paper aimed to clarify science teacher professional development program through lesson study in case of Khon Kaen University Demonstration Secondary School. The lesson study professional development program was proposed based on a specific Thailand school context – a university demonstration school. Methodology regarded qualitative research. Participants included 3 school administrators and 12 school science teachers who were working at Khon Kaen University Demonstration Secondary School, academic year of 2017. The participant was active in making informed decisions throughout all aspects of the research process for the primary purpose of imparting school social change; a specific action for proposing the lesson study professional development program. The tools of interpretation included the methods and techniques of observing and documenting. Data was analyzed and interpreted to find characteristics, patterns, attributes, and meanings of school science teachers’ collaboratively working for enhancing students’ learning. The findings revealed the proposed lesson study professional development program. The PD program highlighted what should be taken into account for community learning environment in order to enhance the university demonstration school science teachers to find a specific characteristic and collaboration, the pedagogical approach underlying the research lesson, and the development of studies on teaching and learning processes related to the research lesson.

Article Details

How to Cite
Maneelam, P. (2022). Science Teacher Professional Development Program through Lesson Study: Case of Thailand Demonstration School. Asia Research Network Journal of Education, 2(1), 48–60. Retrieved from https://so05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/arnje/article/view/258807
Section
Research Article

References

Akihiko, T. (2006). Implementing lesson study in North American schools, Paper presented at the APEC International Symposium on Innovation and Good Practice for Teaching and Learning Mathematics through Lesson Study, Khon Kaen, Thailand, 13-17 June.

Baviskar, S. N., Hartle R. T. & Whitney T. 2009. “Essential Criteria to Characterize Constructivist Teaching: Derived from a review of the literature and applied to five constructivist-teaching method articles”. International Journal of Science Education 31 (4): 541-550.

Bettencourt, A. 1993. “The construction of knowledge: A radical constructivist view”. In K. Tobin. (ed.). The Practice of Constructivism in Science Education. Washington D.C.: AAAS Press.

Bodner, G. M. 1996. “Constructivism: A theory of knowledge”. Journal of Chemical Education 63 (10): 873-878.

Cerini, B., Murray, I., and Reiss, M. (2003). Student Review of the Science Curriculum. London: Retrieved from http://www.planet-science.com/sciteach/review/Findings.pdf. 10 April 2016.

Charinee, T. (2009). Lesson Study Approach : New Alternative to develop instructional. Education Journal. 3(57) : 131-149.

Colburn, A. 2000. “Constructivism: Science education’s Grand unifying theory”. The Clearing House 74 (1): 9-12.

Ebrahim, A. (2007). The Effects of Traditional Learning and a Learning Cycle Inquiry Learning Strategy on Students’ Science Achievement and Attitudes Science, Dissertation Abstracts International. 64(04): 1232-A.

Fernandez, C. and Yoshida, M. (2004). Lesson study: A Japanese approach to improving mathematic teaching and learning. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associate.

Fosnot, C. 1996. Constructivism: A psychological theory of learning. In C.T. Fosnot. (ed.). Constructivism: Theory, Perpective, and Practice. New York: Teacher College Press, 8-13.

Inprasitha, Maitree. (2003). Training Document for Teacher Training Course. Faculty of Education. Khon Kaen University.

Inprasitha, Maitree. et al. (2009). Teacher Professional Development using Lesson Study and Open Approach: The Pilot Project of Academic Year 2009.

Inprasitha, M. One feature of adaptive lesson study in Thailand: Designing learning unit. Proceeding of the 45th Korean National Meeting of Mathematics Education (pp. 193-206). Gyeongju: Dongkook University. (2010).

Khon Kaen University Demonstration School (KKDS) (2013). The Program of the 4th Satit Academic Forum 2013. Khon Kaen: Khon Kaen Printing.

Laurillard, D. (2012). Teaching as a Design Science: Building Pedagogical for Learning and Technology. New York : Routledge.

Lederman, N. G., Gess-Newsome, J., & Latz, M. S. (1994). The nature and development of preservice science teachers’ conceptions of subject matter and pedagogy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(2), 129–146.

Lewis, C. 2002. Lesson study: A handbook of teacher-led instructional change. Philadelphia: Research for better school.

Matoba, M. (2005). Improving Teaching and Enhancing Learning: A Japanese Perspective. The First Annual Conference on Learning Study, The Hong Kong Institute of Education, 1-3 December 2005

Office of the National Education Commission, (2003) . Offers strategic production And teacher development : teachers reform Learning Reform. Meeting documents.

Phaikhumnam, W. and Yuenyong, C. (2018). Improving the primary school science learning unit about force and motion through lesson study. AIP Conference Proceedings. 1923, 030037-1 – 030037-5.

Promotion Office of learning society and the quality of youth, (2007). Critical phenomena science classroom Thailand by Tom Corcoran, Columbia University, Retrieved from http://www.qlf.or.th/Home/Contents/499. 13 April 2016.

Thongnoppakun, W. and Yuenyong, C. (2018). Capturing and portraying science student teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge through CoRe construction. AIP Conference Proceedings. 1923, 030051-1 – 030051-5.

Thongnoppakun, W. and Yuenyong, C. (2019). Pre-service science teachers' professional learning through content representations (CoRes) construction. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(4), 1263-1275

Richit, A. 2020. Lesson study in the perspective of teacher educators. Revista Brasileira de Educação v. 25 e250044

Toplis, R., ed. (2011). How Science Works: Exploring Effect Pedagogy and Practice. New York : Routledge.

Udomkan, W., Suwannoi, P., Chanpeng, P., Yuenyong, C. (2015). Thai Pre-service Chemistry Teachers’ Constructivist Teaching Performances. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(4 S3), 223-232.

Wagner, T. (2008). The Global Achievement Gap: When Even Our Best Schools Don’t Teach the New Survival Skills Our Children Need and What We Can Do about It. New York: Basic Books.

Williams, J. D. (2008). Science Now and then: discovering how science works. Science School Review 90 (330) : 45-46.

White, A. (2004). The lesson study approach to implementing change, Paper presented at SEAMEO-UNESCO Education Congress and EXPO Secretariat, Bangkok, Thailand. Retrieved from www.seameo-unesco.org/fullpaper/ MMM1/ 101/FP. 19 April 20016.

Woranetsudathip, N. and Yuenyong, C. (2015). Enhancing grade 1 Thai students’ learning about mathematical ideas on addition through lesson study and open approach. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(2S1), 28-33.

Woranetsudathip, N, Yuenyong, C, and Nguyen, TT (2021). The innovative lesson study for enhancing students’ mathematical ideas about addition and subtraction through open approach. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1835 (1), 012061

Yager, R.E. (2007). How are we stacking up?: Current reform in science education twelve years after publication of the National Science Education Standards. Iowa Science Teachers Journal. 34(3): 19-25.

Yuenyong, C. and Thathong, K. (2015). Physics teachers’ constructing knowledge base for physics teaching regarding constructivism in Thai contexts. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(2), 546-553.