Blended Learning Pedagogy to Support Student-Centered Classrooms

Main Article Content

Roxan Consolacion
Amelia Buan
Lowell Lucero
Kim Tanduyan

Abstract

Blended learning has become a mainstream educational activity that gives teachers the ability to flip classrooms, improve instruction, and empower student independent learning. However, flipping the class is not enough to support students’ learning but through the design and implementation that accounts for a sufficient understanding of technology, content, and pedagogy. This study investigated 5 blended learning courses and 50 faculty assessed the school's support using quantitative and qualitative data and correlational methods of analysis. 126 students were asked about their satisfaction and quality of BL implementation. Majority of the implementers do not have a model to anchor in the BL implementation. Students evaluated BL courses somehow partially meet student satisfaction in terms of engagement, tools and information needed during the actual implementation compared to the expected practices students prefer. Thus, the result is a groundwork in designing the blended learning model to address blended learning gaps. The developed BL model includes the elements of college policy support and faculty support in the planning stage, student and faculty support in implementation stage, and student support and policy support in monitoring and evaluation stage. Researchers believe an overarching collaboration of the said elements will ensure quality student-centered blended learning implementation. 

Article Details

How to Cite
Consolacion, R., Buan, A., Lucero, L., & Tanduyan, K. (2024). Blended Learning Pedagogy to Support Student-Centered Classrooms. Asia Research Network Journal of Education, 4(3), 112–125. retrieved from https://so05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/arnje/article/view/275983
Section
Research Article

References

Birman, B. F., Desimone, L., Porter, A. C., & Garet, M. S. (2000). Designing professional development that works. Educational Leadership 57(8), 28-33.

Bouilheres, F., Le, L.T.V.H., McDonald, S. et al. Defining student learning experience through blended learning. Educ Inf Technol (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10100-y

Dewi et al.(2017, December).Critical Success Factor for Implementing Vocational Blended Learning. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/322948581_Critical_Success_Factor_for_Implementing_Vocational_Blended_Learning

Draper, S. (2013, March 24). Social Constructivism. http://www.psy.gla.ac.uk/~steve/courses/archive/CERE12-13-safari-archive/topic3/webarchive-index.html

Gambari et al.(2017). Effectiveness of Blended Learning and Elearning Modes of Instruction on the Performance of Undergraduates in Kwara State, Nigeria. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1125071

Garrison, R. D., & Vaughan, N.D. (2013). Institutional Change and Leadership Associated with Blended Learning Innovation: Two case studies. Internet and Higher Education, 18 (2013), 24-28.

Garrison, D.R.; Vaughan, N.D. Blended Learning in Higher Education: Framework, Principles, and Guidelines; Jossey-Bass: San Francisco, CA, USA, 2008.

Graham et al.(2018, February). Blended learning: the new normal and emerging technologies. Retrieved from https://educationaltechnologyjournal.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s41239-017-0087-5

Hechter, R & Vermette, L.A.(2013).Technology Integration in K-12 Science Classrooms. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1131093

Hurst, B., Wallace, R., & Nixon, S. B. (2013). The Impact of Social Interaction on Student Learning. Reading Horizons: A Journal of Literacy and Language Arts, 52 (4). Retrieved from https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/reading_horizons/vol52/iss4/5

Kaleta, R., Skibba, K., & Joosten, T. (2007). Discovering, designing, and delivering hybrid courses. In A.G. Picciano & C.D. Dziuban (Eds.), Blended Learning: Research Perspectives (pp. 111–143). Needham, MA: The Sloan Consortium.

Kintu, M.J., Zhu, C. & Kagambe, E. Blended learning effectiveness: the relationship between student characteristics, design features and outcomes. Int J Educ Technol High Educ 14, 7 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0043-4

Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2005). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge. Teachers College Record. Volume 108, Number 6, June 2006, pp. 1017–1054. Retrieved from http://one2oneheights.pbworks.com/f/MISHRA_PUNYA.pdf

Lim, C.P. & Wang, L.B. (Eds.) (2016). Blended Learning for Quality Higher Education: Selected Case Studies on Implementation from Asia-Pacific. Paris, France: UNESCO. Retrieved from

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/311806838_Lim_CP_Wang_LB_Eds_2016_Blended_Learning_for_Quality_Higher_Education_Selected_Case_Studies_on_Implementation_from_Asia-Pacific_Paris_France_UNESCO

Meyer, Salomé & Wohlers, Shane & Marshall, Robert. (2014). Blended learning: student experiences. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/269635377_Blended_learning_student_experiences

Mirriahi et al.,(2015, October). A blended learning framework for curriculum design and professional development. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/283553300_A_blended_learning_framework_for_curriculum_design_and_professional_development

Norberg, A., Dziuban, C.D., & Moskal, P.D. (2011). A time-based blended learning model. On the Horizon, 19(3), 207-216. doi:10.1108/10748121111163913

Owston, R. D., York, D., & Murtha, S. (2013). Student perceptions and achievement in a university blended learning strategic initiative. The Internet and Higher Education, 18,38–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003

Schindel JT, Hughes, CA and Sadowski, CA (2013). Blended Learning: Reflections on Teaching Experiences across the Pharmacy Education Continuum. Pharmacy 2013, 1, 137-152; doi:10.3390/pharmacy1020137. www.mdpi.com/journal/pharmacy

Seraji, F. (2018,May). Blended Learning. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/325147518_blended_learning

Taylor, P. and Maor, D. (2000, January). The Constructivist On-Line Learning Environment Survey (COLLES). https://surveylearning.moodle.com/colles/?fbclid=IwAR11iBrH7b7jknW1oAlgc_uCR3UDNxgAICYUSAKJTSzUjk9-8KnIElkl4XQ

Taylor, P. and Maor, D. (2000). Assessing the efficacy of online teaching with the Constructivist On-Line Learning Environment Survey. In A. Herrmann and M.M. Kulski (Eds), Flexible Futures in Tertiary Teaching. Proceedings of the 9th Annual Teaching Learning Forum, 2-4 February 2000. Perth: Curtin University of Technology.

Wong et al.,(2014, April). A framework for investigating blended learning effectiveness. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/262889822_A_framework_for_investigating_blended_learning_effectiveness