Assessment of Alternative Learning System (ALS) Secondary Students’ Conceptual Understanding and Science Process Skills in Strand 2

Main Article Content

Abdul Basit Barabato
Inoray Latip

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the assessment of Alternative Learning System (ALS) secondary students’ conceptual understanding and science process skills in strand 2. The study used one – group pretest-posttest design. The participants were 60 ALS students in the Municipality of Munai, Lanao del Norte during the school year 2023 – 2024. The findings showed that majority of respondents were in the age bracket of below 21 and 21 – 25 which gives a percentage of (36.7) while for the grade level last attended, grade 7 received the highest response rate of (43.3%). After the intervention, it shows that there is no significant relationship between the respondents’ profile in terms of age and grade level last attended and the conceptual and science process skills of the students. Moreover, it was found after intervention that there was a significant difference on the students’ conceptual understanding test mean score. As for the comparison of the science process skills test mean score of the students before and after intervention, it shows a significant difference. Furthermore, it shows that there is no significant relationship between the students’ conceptual understanding and the science process skills of the students. As a result, it is recommended for the future researcher that the sample size and the scope of the study should be increased to determine the conceptual understanding and science process skills of the students under the program of Alternative Learning System (ALS) not only in Municipality of Munai but also in other municipalities in in the Philippines.

Article Details

How to Cite
Barabato, A. B., & Latip, I. (2025). Assessment of Alternative Learning System (ALS) Secondary Students’ Conceptual Understanding and Science Process Skills in Strand 2 . Asia Research Network Journal of Education, 5(1), 15–24. retrieved from https://so05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/arnje/article/view/277753
Section
Articles

References

Abun, D., Jeremy, G., Alipio, C.D., Reginaldo, L.A. (2023). The Effect of Students’ Attitude toward Research on the Intention to Conduct Research. https://hal.science/hal-04101990/document

Bala, Jgoti (2016). Contribution of SPSS in Social Science Research. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science. 7(6), 250.

Counsell, A. and Cribbie, R.A. (2020). Students’ Attitudes Toward Learning Statistics with R. Psychology Teaching Review, 26(2), https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1278446.pdf

Hattan, C., Alexander, P.A., Lupo, S.M. (2023). Leveraging What Students Know to Make Sense of Texts: What the Research Says About Prior Knowledge Activation. American Educational Research Association 94(1). https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654322114847

Manriquie-Gallos, B. (2022). Senior High School Students’ Attitudes Towards Research. Journal of Education Practice, 13(20): 56- 63

Masuadi, E., Mohamud, M., Almutairi, M., Alsunaidi, A., Alswayed A.K., and Aldhafeeri, O.F. (2021). Trends in the Usage of Statistical Software and Their Associated Study Designs in Health Sciences Research: A Bibliometric Analysis. Cureus. 13(1): e12639. doi:10.7759/cureus.12639

Milovanovic, M., Perisic, J. (2020). Advantages and Limitations of using SPSS in teaching statistics. Faculty of Applied Management, Economics and Finance Belgrade.ISBN 978-86-84531-50-8.

Rahman, A. and Muktadik G. (2021). SPSS: An Imperative Quantitative Data Analysis Tool for Social Science Research. http://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2021.51012

Roxas, M.J. (2020). Attitudes of Senior high School Students towards Research: An Exploratory Study. 10.2139/ssrn.3583225

Tiamuh, Z. (2020). Technology Effectiveness in Teaching Statistics: Best-Evidence Meta Analysis. The Aquila Digital Community, Dissertations. 1759. https://aquila.usm.edu/dissertations/1759

Yuniwati, and Soleh, D.A. (2020). The Effectiveness of Computer-Based Problem to Improve Higher Order Thinking Skills on Prospective Teachers. International Journal of Instruction, 13(2): 393 – 406