Student-Centered Insights into Remote Education: Needs, Challenges, and Adaptations

Main Article Content

Roxan Consolacion

Abstract

The Department of Technology Teacher Education implemented a new learning modality called Remote Teaching and Learning (RTL) during the pandemic. This study employed a mixed-methods research design to examine students' perceptions of their experiences with remote learning across seven key areas: learning modality, school health measures, academic needs, student engagement, relationships, cultural awareness, and school resource officers. A total of 197 students from various academic levels and specializations, ranging from freshmen to seniors, participated in the survey. Quantitative data were collected through structured questionnaires, which provided measurable insights into student experiences. For qualitative insights, open-ended questions were included in the survey, and responses were analyzed using thematic analysis to identify recurring patterns and emerging themes. This dual approach enabled a comprehensive understanding of students' remote learning experiences. Findings indicate a positive perception of remote learning, but challenges in technological proficiency, social interaction, and parental support persist. University safety protocols were effective, fostering a secure learning environment. Academic assistance remains a concern, requiring stronger support systems, leadership, and training. While students remain engaged, focus and attendance issues exist. Faculty observations highlight strong student-adult relationships and meaningful technology-based interactions. Effective communication between parents and faculty is crucial. Promoting cultural awareness requires leadership and professional development. Aligning with Sustainable Development Goals, this study advocates for a flexible, student-centered approach to post-pandemic education.

Article Details

How to Cite
Consolacion, R. (2025). Student-Centered Insights into Remote Education: Needs, Challenges, and Adaptations. Asia Research Network Journal of Education, 5(2), 65–78. retrieved from https://so05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/arnje/article/view/280168
Section
Articles

References

Ellen Nesset Mælan, Gustavsen, A. M., Stranger-Johannessen, E., & Nordahl, T. (2021). Norwegian students’ experiences of homeschooling during the COVID-19 pandemic. European Journal of Special Needs Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2021.1872843

Gudmundsdottir, G. B., & Hathaway, D. M. (2020). “We always make it work”: Teachers’ agency in the time of crisis. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 28(2), 239–250.

Krumsvik, R. J. (2020). Homeschooling, remote teaching and digital building in a societal crisis. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 15, 71–85.

Panorama Education. (2020). Back-to-school surveys for distance, hybrid, or in-person learning in 2020–21. https://www.escneo.org/Downloads/BackToSchoolSurvey2020.pdf

Panorama Education. (2021). Panorama offsite learning survey results 2021 – Ames Community School District. https://amescsd.org/2021/01/panorama-offsite-learning-survey-results-2021/

Simpson, O. (2000). Supporting Students in Open and Distance Learning. London: Kogan Page.

Simpson, O. (2015). CEMCA EdTech Notes: Student support service for success in open and distance learning. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

Tiwari, S., & Khan, N. A. (2021). Forced homeschooling during Covid-19 pandemic. Research Review International Journal of Multidisciplinary. 6(2):85-92. https://doi.org/10.31305/rrijm.2021.v06.i02.015