The Development of a model for evaluating creative work

Authors

  • Farreeda Heemadam Faculty of Education, Naresuan University
  • Samran Mejang Faculty of Education, Naresuan University
  • Omthajit Pansri Faculty of Education, Naresuan University
  • Chanadda Poohongthong Faculty of Education, Naresuan University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.60101/faraa.2026.282085

Keywords:

Creative Assessment, Rubric, Art Assessment, Evaluation Model

Abstract

This article presents knowledge about the development of models for evaluating creative works in art, aiming to describe the characteristics and types of evaluation in the educational context, as well as the various formats and approaches to art teaching. The content covers important issues, including the quality of evaluation, the evaluation process, criteria for evaluating creative works, and the steps in creating evaluation criteria. Analysis of the current situation reveals that art and visual arts institutions use diverse evaluation methods for creative works. Therefore, using criteria that truly reflect creativity requires the development of evaluation models and methods that are consistent with the current context. The development of such models is a systematic and academically based process consisting of six steps: 1) Study and analyze basic data, 2) Analysis of components, 3) Creation/development of forms, 4) Trial use, 5) Evaluation of forms, and 6) Improvement. The components of creative work evaluation cover six areas: 1) originality, 2) arrangement of components, 3) expression in form and content, 4) application, 5) professional skills, and 6) completeness of the work. This process is to ensure that the work's value and potential This process provides a quality, appropriate, and fair assessment of the value and potential of the work in a quality, appropriate, and fair manner. Therefore, having a good model for evaluating creative works will promote
mutual understanding between students and evaluators and is also an important tool for developing the potential of creators to progress further.

References

Bunkaeo, D. (2020). The coexistence of subjectivity and objectivity. [Master's Thesis, Silpakorn University]. [in Thai]

Chalermsuk, N. (2017). Creating the Visual Arts: promote imagination learning. Veridian E-Journal, Silpakorn University, 10(1), 70-82. [in Thai]

Eisner, E.(1967).Educational Connoisseurship and Criticism Model. Turkish OnlineJournal of Qualitative Inquiry, 1(2), 450-470.

Inpun, W. (2014). Development of virtual classroom with collaborative learning upon creative product of secondary education students. [Master’s Thesis, Rajamangala University of Technology Thanyaburi]. [in Thai]

Khwannan, J. (2015). The development of a mathematics literacy assessment model [Doctoral dissertation, Naresuan University]. [in Thai]

Keawsuphan, S. (2009). An effective adminisstration Model for Educational Quality Assurence of basic Education School. [Doctoral dissertation, Rajabhat Maha Sarakham University]. [in Thai]

Kuroda, A. (2018). Assessment in Art Education. Journal of Education Studies, Chulalongkorn University, 46(4 ), 480-500. [in Thai]

Nijaneat, C. (2017). Model Development Research in Social Sciences and Education. Suratthani Rajabhat Journal, 4(2), 72-102. [in Thai]

Patphol, M. (2018). Developing the Model of Assessment for Learning of Graduate Students. Veridian E-Journal, Silpakorn University, 11(3), 3413-3432. [in Thai]

Poopayang, P. (2011). Evaluation of Eduation management for the catholic schools in Khonkaen province. [Doctoral dissertation, Khon Kaen University]. [in Thai]

Songprasert, P. (2007). The development of administrative model by teamwork in basic education schools. [Doctoral dissertation, Naresuan University]. [in Thai]

Sudtae, K. Wongkasem S. and Phoglin S. (2010). Development of Academic Administration Model for Small Sized Schools. Rajabhat Maha Sarakham University Journal; RMU.J. 4(2), 405-520. [in Thai]

Vanichwatanavorachai, S. (2009). The development of anexperiential model with parental participation to enhance the social skills of preschool children. [Doctoral dissertation, Silpakorn University]. [in Thai]

Wongsaksirikul, S. (2022). Development of choice-based art activities to promote creative art for children aged 9-12 year old. [Master's thesis, Chulalongkorn University]. [in Thai]

Urwongse, K. (2019). Focus Group Discussion: Effective Qualitative Data Collection Technique. STOU Education Journal, 12(1), 17-29. [in Thai]

Downloads

Published

2026-08-29

How to Cite

Heemadam, F., Mejang, S., Pansri, O., & Poohongthong, C. (2026). The Development of a model for evaluating creative work. Journal of fine arts research and applied arts, 13(2), E282085 (1–12). https://doi.org/10.60101/faraa.2026.282085

Issue

Section

Academic Articles