A New Perspective on the Perception of Thai Culture Reflected by Thai University Students’ Accounts through the Lens of Small Cultures

Main Article Content

Nasatorn Witayarat

Abstract

Thai culture has been discussed in several studies, yet such discussion is fixed and fails to consider the complexity and dynamism of Thai culture in response to the changing circumstances within society. This qualitative study employed an innovative photo-elicitation technique, utilizing online semi-structured interviews, to explore eighteen Thai university students’ perceptions of Thai culture and to establish whether or not their perceptions differ from prescribed ethnic, national, and international qualities. Data from the Thematic Analysis demonstrate that Thai university students’ perceptions differ from traditional Thai cultural values in terms of the openness of their sexual attitudes and behavior, the equal relationships between younger and older people, and the promotion of gender equality. Using the notion of small cultures as a conceptual framework, the findings add variety to Thai cultural values and beliefs and raise questions about an imagined conception of national cultures, leading to cultural generalizations by setting up stereotypes of others. Taken together, this study suggests moving beyond generalizations or stereotypes about national groups, or the essentialist view of culture, supporting the notion that culture is dynamic and complex and unrestricted by national boundaries. This study contributes to wider scholarship on intercultural communication by demonstrating that there are a variety of behaviors and perceptions of Thai culture within a single group of Thai people, highlighting that Thai culture is constantly evolving and never fixed.

Article Details

How to Cite
Witayarat, N. (2023). A New Perspective on the Perception of Thai Culture Reflected by Thai University Students’ Accounts through the Lens of Small Cultures. Parichart Journal, 36(2), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.55164/pactj.v36i2.259792
Section
Research Articles

References

Areemit, R. S. Cooper, C. M. Wirasorn, K. Paopongsawan, P. Panthongviriyakul, C. & Ramani, S. (2021). Hierarchy, “Kreng Jai” and feedback: a grounded theory study exploring perspectives of clinical faculty and medical students in Thailand. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 33(3), 235-244. https://doi.org/10.1080/10401334.2020.1813584.

Pimpa, N. (2012). Amazing Thailand: Organizational culture in the Thai public sector. International Business Research, 5(11), 35-42. https://doi.org/10.5539/ibr.v5n11p35.

Yukongdi, V. (2010). A study of Thai employees' preferred leadership style. Asia Pacific Business Review, 16(1-2), 161-181. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602380903168962.

Holliday, A. (1999). Small cultures. Applied Linguistics, 20(2), 237-264. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/20.2.237

Jackson, J. (2020). Introducing language and intercultural communication. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351059275.

Cortazzi, M., & Jin, L. (1996). Cultures of learning: Language classrooms in China. In H. Coleman (Ed.). Society and the Language Classroom. (pp.169-206). Cambridge University Press.

Dimock, M. (2019). Defining generations: Where millennials end and generation Z begins. Retrieved August 9, 2022, from https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/01/17/where-millennials-end-andgeneration-z-begins/.

Buriyameathagul, K. (2013). Characteristics of culture in Thai society and virtual communities. Silpakorn University Journal of Social Sciences, Humanities, and Arts, 13(2), 207-270. https://so02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/hasss/article/view/14497.

Hofstede, G. (1991). Cultures and organizations: Software of the Mind. McGraw-Hill.

Ngammuk, P. (2016). A comparison of the Twelve core values of Thai people defined by the head of the national council for peace and order (NCPO) found in Thai private and public university students. [Paper Presentation]. 14th annual international conference on education. Hawaii.

Fuangtharnthip, P. Jaitui, K. Pachimsawat, P. Bhattarai, B. P. Manopatanakul, S. & Kasetsuwan, J. (2021). Cultural dimensions of dental students in a Thai university. Science, Engineering and Health Studies, 15, 1-9. https://li01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sehs/article/view/246533.

Farrell, W. C. & Phungsoonthorn, T. (2020). Generation Z in Thailand. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 20(1), 25-51. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470595820904116.

Pummanee, T. Tedla, Y. G. & Riesch, S. K. (2018). Barriers to the quality of parent-adolescent communication in Thailand: an ecological system analysis. International journal of child development and mental health, 6(1), 87-101. https://he01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/cdmh/article/view/122867.

Gu, Q., & Schweisfurth, M. (2016). Transnational flows of students: in whose interest? For whose benefits? In S. McGrath & Q. Gu (Eds.), Routledge handbook of international education and development. (pp.359-372). Routledge.

Al Jazeera. (2020). Student demonstrators demand school reform in Thailand. Retrieved August 17, 2022, from https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020/9/6/student-demonstrators-demand-school-reform-in-thailand.

Prommak, S. (2019). Critical thinking cognitions and pedagogic practices of Thai EFL university teachers. [Doctoral Thesis, University of Stirling]. https://dspace.stir.ac.uk/handle/1893/30307#.YxYRJXZBw2w.

Waratworawan, W. Boonmongkon, P. Samoh, N. Promnart, P. & Guadamuz, T. E. (2021). “Kids these days pretend to be grownups”(dekkaedaet): sexual control and negotiation among young Thai female students. BMC Public Health, 21(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-10789-7.

Tangmunkongvorakul, A. Carmichael, G. Banwell, C. Utomo, I. D. & Sleigh, A. (2011). Sexual perceptions and practices of young people in Northern Thailand. Journal of Youth Studies, 14(3), 315-339. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2010.522562.

Sridawruang, C. Crozier, K. & Pfeil, M. (2010). Attitudes of adolescents and parents towards premarital sex in rural Thailand: A qualitative exploration. Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare, 1(4), 181-187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.srhc.2010.06.003.

Wailerdsak, N. (2020). Women in business and management in Thailand. Journal of Southeast Asian Economies, 37(2), 163-180. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/763968. https://doi.org/10.1355/ae372c.

Ratchatakorntrakoon, R. (2019). Representations of single woman in Thai films: The reproduction of [atriarchy ideology. Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences Studies, 19(2), 271-296. https://doi.org/10.14456/hasss.2019.16.

Nomnian, S. (2017). Thai PhD students and their supervisors at an Australian university: Working relationship, communication, and agency. PASAA, 53, 26-58. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1153678.

Pimpa, N. (2012). Amazing Thailand: Organizational culture in the Thai public sector. International Business Research, 5(11), 35-42. https://doi.org/10.5539/ibr.v5n11p35.

Yukongdi, V. (2010). A study of Thai employees' preferred leadership style. Asia Pacific Business Review, 16(1-2), 161-181. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602380903168962.

Neuliep, J. W. (2015). Intercultural communication: A contextual approach. Sage.

Tarry, E.F. (2011). Is West really best? Social and cultural tensions international students experience having studied at British universities. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 35(1), 69-87. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2010.540316.

Jory, P. (2015). Thailand's politics of politeness: Qualities of a gentleman and the making of ‘Thai manners’. South East Asia Research, 23(3), 357-375. https://doi.org/10.5367/sear.2015.0271.

Holliday, A. (2016). Revisiting intercultural competence: small culture formation on the go through threads of experience. International Journal of Bias, Identity and Diversities in Education, 1(2), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJBIDE.2016070101.

Castillo-Montoya, M. (2016). Preparing for interview research: The interview protocol refinement framework. The Qualitative Report, 21(5), 811-831. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2016.2337.

Welch, C. & Piekkari, R. (2006). Crossing language boundaries: Qualitative interviewing in international business. Management International Review, 46(4), 417-437. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-006-0099-1

Banks, M., & Zeitlyn, D. (2015). Visual methods in social research. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473921702

Glaw, X. Inder, K. Kable, A. & Hazelton, M. (2017). Visual methodologies in qualitative research: Autophotography and photo elicitation applied to mental health research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917748215.

Thomas, D. R. (2017). Feedback from research participants: are member checks useful in qualitative research? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 14(1), 23-41. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2016.1219435.

Van Nes, F. Abma, T. Jonsson, H. & Deeg, D. (2010). Language differences in qualitative research: Is meaning lost in translation? European Journal of Ageing, 7(4), 313-316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-010-0168-y.

Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.

Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2015). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. Sage.

Rose, G. (2014). “On the relation between ‘visual research methods’ and contemporary visual culture.” The Sociological Review, 62(1), 24–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-954X.12109.

Vu, T. T. (2021). Gender role attitudes and the division of housework in young married couples in northern Vietnam. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 52(1), 90-109. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002246342100014X .

Faulkner, S. L. Baldwin, J. R. Lindsley, S. L. & Hecht, M. L. (2006). Layers of Meaning: An Analysis of Definitions of Culture. In J. R. Baldwin, S. L. Faulkner, M. L. Hecht, & S. L. Lindsley (Eds.). Redefining culture: Perspectives across the disciplines. (pp. 27-52). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410617002.