Mitigating Linguistic Devices Utilized via Public Figures Interview: A Case Study of Thai Celebrities and Politicians
Main Article Content
Abstract
The objective of this research was to study the mitigating linguistic devices employed by public figures in the entertainment industry and political group when they were interviewed. Interviewed videos which were broadcasted on YouTube website since November, 1, 2022 to April, 30, 2023 were used as data. They included1) entertainment news program, entitled ‘Nine Entertain Official’, 2) ‘The Secret Sauce’, and 3) ‘Euai talk’. The result revealed that there were six linguistic devices used by celebrities: 1. mitigating quantity, 2. expressing opinion, 3. predicting, 4. ambiguity, 5. substituting another word upon the mitigating one, and 6. humor. When Thai politicians were interviewed, there were also six devices being applied: 1.expressing opinion, 2. predicting, 3. mitigating quantity, 4. ambiguity, 5. substituting another word upon the mitigating one, and 6. conditional sentence. In terms of sociocultural factors related to utilizing the linguistic devices, the findings revealed that the devices and contents toward celebrities and politicians reflected mutualism, affiliative society, gratitude, awareness of contexts and social interactions, fun, utilizing Thai idioms, morality, and Buddhist doctrines.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Ongwuttiwat, S. (2010). Linguistic strategies of Thai celebrities when answering questions posed by the media in interview situation. Vannavidas journal, 10(2), 54-93. (in Thai)
Chen, R. (2001). Self-politeness. Journal of Pragmatics, 33, 87-106.
Obeng, S. G. (1997). Communicational strategies: Persuasion and politeness in Akan judicial discourse. TEXT, 17, 25-51.
Vongkrajang, N. (2002). Thai politicians' face-saving strategies in answering questions [Master’s thesis, Chulalongkorn University]. (in Thai)
Ongwuttiwat, S. (2011). Disagreement in Thai conversational discourse and native speakers' motivational concerns. [Doctoral dissertation, Chulalongkorn University]. (in Thai)
The Standard. (2023, April, 10). The Secret Sauce. https://www.youtube.com/@TheSecretSauceTH (in Thai)
Nine Entertain MCOT. (2023, April, 26). Nine Entertain. https://www.youtube.com/c/NineEntertainMCOT (in Thai)
Matichon TV. (2023, April, 9). Euai talk. https://www.youtube.com/hashtag/เอื้อยtalk
Phuengchim, P. (1999). Questioning strategies in two categories of television interview discourse. [Master’s thesis, Chulalongkorn University]. (in Thai)
Greatbatch, D. (1986). Some standard uses of supplementary question in news interviews. Belfast Working Papers in Language and Linguistics, 8, 86-123.
Dillon, J.T. (1990). The practice of questioning. Routledge.
Thiamsombun, S. (1998). Linguistics devices in politicians’ response in journalistic Interviews. [Master’s thesis, Chulalongkorn University]. (in Thai)
Austin, J.L. (1962). How to do thing with words. Oxford University Press.
Deephadung, S. (2009). Basic pragmatics (2ndEd.). Research Institute of Languages and Cultures of Asia, Mahidol University Press. (in Thai)
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1978). Universal in language usage: Politeness phenomena. Cambridge University Press.
Hanks, W., Ide, S., & Katagiri, Y. (2009). Towards an emancipatory pragmatics Introduction. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(1), 1-9.
Ongwuttiwat, S. (2021). The speech act of responding to disappointment in Thai: A case study of interlocutors with equal status. Thai Studies Journal, 17(1), 181-246. (in Thai)
Ongwuttiwat, S. (2010). Linguistic strategies of Thai celebrities when answering questions posed by the media in interview situation. Vannavidas journal, 10(2), 54-93. (in Thai)
Prasitratsin, A. (2013). Sociolinguistics (5thEd.). Chulalongkorn University Press. (in Thai)
Bundhumedha, N. (2006). Thai Grammar (3rd Ed.). Chulalongkorn University Press. (in Thai)
Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual. Essays on face-to-face behavior. The Penguin Press.