Comparing the Effect of Hybrid Work and Onsite Work on Employee Motivation in Thailand
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
บทคัดย่อ
To maximize employee motivation, the researcher aims to examine how the onsite work and hybrid work affect employee motivation in Thailand. An online questionnaire, adapted from the multidimensional work motivation scale, was utilized as the primary tool for data collection. The researcher gathered and analyzed responses from 400 questionnaires using statistical methods, including t-tests, ANOVA, and MANOVA. The result indicated that the work conditions do not have an impact on employee motivation at a significant 0.05 level. However, results indicate that access to a dedicated workspace positively contributes to the motivation of hybrid employees. Additionally, marital status was found to affect motivation, with single hybrid employees reporting higher motivation levels than married hybrid and married onsite employees. These findings suggest that employers should ensure that all employees receive equitable benefits without presuming that one group is more motivated than another.
Article Details
อนุญาตภายใต้เงื่อนไข Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
เอกสารอ้างอิง
Cisco. (2023). From mandate to magnet: The race to reimagine workplaces and workspaces for a
hybrid future. https://www.cisco.com/c/dam/m/en_us/solutions/hybrid-work/hybrid-work-index/documents/cisco-hybrid-future.pdf
Busch, E., Nash, J., & Bell, B. S. (2011). Remote work: An examination of current trends and emerging issues. Center for Advanced Human Resource Studies, Cornell University, 2(3), 6.
Bergefurt, L., van den Boogert, P. F., Appel-Meulenbroek, R., & Kemperman, A. (2024). The interplay of workplace satisfaction, activity support, and productivity support in the hybrid work context. Building and Environment, 261, 111729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.111729
Reean Jyka P. Corral. (2024). Impact of hybrid and on-site work arrangements on employee motivation and job satisfaction in the BPO industry: A cross-sectional study. Open Journal of Business and Management, 12(2), 485–503. https://www.scirp.org/journal/paperinformation.aspx?paperid=131322
Andreas, D. (2022). Employee performance: The effect of motivation and job satisfaction. Produktif: Jurnal Kepegawaian dan Organisasi, 1(1), 28–35.
Reeve, J. (2024). Understanding motivation and emotion (8th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
Alrawahi, S., Sellgren, S. F., Altouby, S., Alwahaibi, N., & Brommels, M. (2020). The application of Herzberg's two-factor theory of motivation to job satisfaction in clinical laboratories in Omani hospitals. Heliyon, 6(9), e04985. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04985
He, J., & Kenikasahmanworakhun, P. (2024). Empirical analysis of motivational factors from ERG theory on employee effectiveness and retention at Beijing Jinwan Ruicheng Technology Co., Ltd. Journal of Value Chain Management and Business Strategy, 3(2), 16–37.
Jindain, C., & Gilitwala, B. (2024). The factors impacting the intermediating variable of employee engagement toward employee performance in a hybrid working model. Rajagiri Management Journal, 18(2), 167–179. https://doi.org/10.1108/RAMJ-11-2023-0089
Danica, B., & Tomislav, B. (2013). Relationship between working conditions and job satisfaction: The case of Croatian shipbuilding company. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 4(1), 206–213.
Kurniawanto, H., Rahmadi, Z. T., & Wahyudi, M. A. (2022). Effect of work environment and motivation on employee performance with job satisfaction as a mediation. International Journal of Social and Management Studies, 3(3), 150–162. https://doi.org/10.5555/ijsms.v3i3.153
Meng, X., & Yang, D. (2023). Marital status differences in the association of work motivation with burnout: A network perspective. Current Psychology, 43, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-04124-5
Çemberci, M., Civelek, M. E., Ertemel, A. V., & Cömert, P. N. (2022). The relationship of work
engagement with job experience, marital status and having children among flexible workers after the Covid-19 pandemic. PloS one, 17(11), e0276784.
W.G. Cochran. (1977). Sampling Techniques (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons, New York.
Kılıç, S. (2016). Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficient. Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, 6(1), 47.
Antoni, W., & Bohdan, R. (2022). Remote, hybrid, and on-site work during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic and the consequences for stress and work engagement. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(1), 2400. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19042400
Ihensekien, O. A., & Joel, A. C. (2023). Abraham Maslow's hierarchy of needs and Frederick Herzberg's two-factor motivation theories: Implications for organizational performance. The Romanian Economic Journal, 85, 5–20.
Nagori, R., & Lawton, N. R. (2024). The design of hybrid work for improved employee engagement and well-being: Perspectives for HRD practice. The International Journal of HRD Practice, Policy and Research, 9(1), 51–64.
Dumitriu, S., Bocean, C. G., Vărzaru, A. A., Al-Floarei, A. T., Sperdea, N. M., Popescu, F. L., & Băloi, I. C. (2025). The role of the workplace environment in shaping employees’ well-being. Sustainability, 17(6), 2613. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17062613
