Exploring Shifts in Learning Patterns Through Tablet Use among Undergraduate Students in Southern Thailand

Main Article Content

Witawin Siripoonsap
Yejin Kim
Muhammad Hassan Arshad

Abstract

Background and Objectives: The rapid integration of digital technologies into higher education has transformed how students access information, communicate, and manage their learning. Tablets offer portability, connectivity, and access to diverse educational applications; however, limited research has examined how they reshape everyday learning practices among undergraduate students in regional contexts. This study explores shifts in learning patterns associated with tablet use among undergraduate students in Southern Thailand, focusing on tablet usage, application preferences, learning practices, and strategies for developing digital skills.
Methods: An exploratory qualitative research design was employed. A focus group interview was conducted with five female first-year undergraduate students from the same academic major at a university in Southern Thailand. The participants had an average age of 19.8 years and had used tablets for an average of 4.6 years. The approximately one-and-a-half-hour interview was guided by a semi-structured questionnaire addressing tablet-based learning patterns, applications and tools, digital learning experiences, skill development, challenges, and recommendations. Data were audio-recorded, supplemented by researcher notes, and analyzed using qualitative content analysis involving familiarization, coding, categorization, and interpretation.
Results: Four major themes emerged: (1) tablet usage, (2) application preferences, (3) learning patterns for two main purposes, and (4) skill development strategies. Tablets, particularly iPads, had become central to participants’ academic activities because of their portability, convenience, and connectivity. Participants reported a shift from traditional reliance on laptops and personal computers toward tablets for classroom and independent learning. They primarily preferred free or pre-installed applications, including GoodNotes, Google Suite, Canva, and YouTube, while also frequently using AI-supported tools such as ChatGPT, Grammarly, and QuillBot. Two broad learning purposes were identified: self-directed learning and academic coursework. Self-directed learning involved pursuing personal learning goals, particularly language learning, through educational and entertainment-oriented digital content. For academic coursework, three learning patterns emerged: information searching–critical thinking–academic production; note-taking–information searching–self-study–academic production; and note-taking–information searching–self-study–peer discussion–academic production. These patterns demonstrate the increasing integration of digital resources, AI tools, self-regulated learning, and online collaboration into students’ academic practices.
Application of the Study: The findings suggest that educators and institutions should provide structured digital literacy training, hands-on workshops, peer mentoring, and clear guidance on the ethical use of AI. Institutional initiatives should also address affordability, access to devices and software, and reliable internet connectivity to reduce digital inequality.
Conclusions: Tablet integration represents a significant shift in learning practices among the participating undergraduate students in Southern Thailand. Tablets have become central tools for self-directed, hybrid, AI-supported, and collaborative learning. However, realizing their educational potential requires stronger institutional support, digital literacy development, ethical guidance, and attention to equitable access. Given the small and homogeneous sample, the findings are exploratory and provide a foundation for future research involving larger and more diverse student populations.

Article Details

How to Cite
Siripoonsap, W., Kim, Y., & Arshad, M. H. (2026). Exploring Shifts in Learning Patterns Through Tablet Use among Undergraduate Students in Southern Thailand. Parichart Journal, 39(4). https://doi.org/10.55164/pactj.v39i4.280574
Section
Research Articles

References

Bangkok Post. (2025, February 25). Digital learning tools on the way. https://www.bangkokpost.com/thailand/general/2967371/digital-learning-tools-on-the-way

Howard, S. K. (2013). Risk-aversion: Understanding teachers' resistance to technology integration. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 22(3), 357–372. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2013.802995

Mulet, J., van de Leemput, C., & Amadieu, F. (2019). A critical literature review of perceptions of tablets for learning in primary and secondary schools. Educational Psychology Review, 31, 631–662. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09478-0

UNESCO. (2021). COVID-19 and education in Southeast Asia: Regional perspectives. UNESCO Regional Office.

Colliot, T., Krichen, O., Girard, N., Anquetil, É., & Jamet, É. (2024). What makes tablet-based learning effective? A study of the role of real-time adaptive feedback. British Journal of Educational Technology, 55, 2278–2295. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13439

Janthapassa, S., Chanthapassa, N., & Kenaphoom, S. (2024). The role of digital literacy in shaping education in the next-normal. Asian Education and Learning Review, 2(1), 29–41. https://doi.org/10.14456/aelr.2024.3

Wongwan, N., & Kwiecien, K. (2025). Digital DNA: Hands-on student perspectives on digital skills and innovation for future practical graduates. Journal of Information Science Research and Practice, 43(1), 89–111. https://doi.org/10.14456/jiskku.2025.6

Laoreiam, P. (2020). Test development of assessing multidimensional digital literacy for Matthayomsuksa one by applying construct modeling [Master's thesis, Srinakharinwirot University]. (In Thai)

Ricoy, M.-C., & Sánchez-Martínez, C. (2020). Revisión sistemática sobre el uso de la tableta en la etapa de educación primaria [A systematic review of tablet use in primary education]. Revista Española de Pedagogía, 78(276), 273–290. https://doi.org/10.22550/REP78-2-2020-04

Pérez-Juárez, M. Á., González-Ortega, D., & Aguiar-Pérez, J. M. (2023). Digital distractions from the point of view of higher education students. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2402.05249

Lazaro, G. R., & Duart, J. M. (2023). Moving learning: A systematic review of mobile learning applications for online higher education. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 12(2), 198–224. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2023.7.1287

Rabiee, F. (2004). Focus-group interview and data analysis. Proceeding of the Nutrition Society, 63(4), 655–660. https://doi.org/10.1079/PNS2004399

Gill, P., & Baillie, J. (2018). Interviews and focus groups in qualitative research: An update for the digital age. British Dental Journal, 225(7), 668–672. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2018.815

Green, J. M., Draper, A. K., & Dowler, E. A. (2003). Shortcuts to safety: Risk and "rules of thumb" in accounts of food choice. Health, Risk & Society, 5(1), 33–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369857031000066056

Dilshad, R. M., & Latif, M. I. (2013). Focus group interview as a tool for qualitative research: An analysis. Pakistan Journal of Social Sciences, 33(1), 191–198. http://pjss.bzu.edu.pk/index.php/pjss/article/view/189

Elo, S., Kääriäinen, M., Kanste, O., Pölkki, T., Utriainen, K., & Kyngäs, H. (2014). Qualitative content analysis: A focus on trustworthiness. SAGE Open, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244014522633

White, M. D., & Marsh, E. E. (2006). Content analysis: A flexible methodology. Library Trends, 55(1), 22–45. https://doi.org/10.1353/lib.2006.0053

Tafonao, T., Saputra, S., & Suryaningwidi, R. (2020). Learning media and technology: Generation Z and Alpha. Indonesian Journal of Instructional Media and Model, 2(2), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.32585/ijimm.v2i2.954

Crawford, J., Butler-Henderson, K., Rudolph, J., Malkawi, B., Glowatz, M., Burton, R., Magni, P., & Lam, S. (2020). COVID-19: 20 countries' higher education intra-period digital pedagogy responses. Journal of Applied Teaching and Learning, 3(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2020.3.1.7

Facer, K., & Selwyn, N. (2021). Digital technology and the futures of education: Towards "non-stupid" optimism. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000377071

Techakosit, S., & Nilsook, P. (2018). The development of STEM literacy using the learning process of scientific imagineering through AR. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 13(1), 230–238. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v13i01.7664