The Dynamic Effects of Government Expenditures on the Output of the Non-Agricultural Sector
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
In this thesis researcher analyses secondary data quarterly Silence into 1997-2015 total 76 quarterly for estimate by independent variable fourth number. while dependent variable fourteen number non-agricultural sectoral branch. And the Analysis Error Correction Model induce result Speed adjustment short run change independent variable adjust effect at all non-agricultural sectoral branch
1. Government expenditures (GE) has affect cause coefficient between 0.194355-0.981357 unit per quarterly maximum score is production externally section agriculture Construction (CQN) = 0.981357 unit per quarterly has minimum score is production externally section agriculture Hotels and Restaurants (HOQN) 0.194355 unit.
2. Price index (PI) has affect cause coefficient between 0.138613-0.896425 unit per quarterly maximum score is production externally section agriculture Private Households with Employed Persons(PBQN) = 0.896425 unit per quarterly has minimum score is production externally section agriculture Health and Social Work (HEQN) = 0.138613 unit.
3. Interest rate (IR) has affect cause coefficient between 0.135302-0.882191 unit per quarterly maximum score is production externally section agriculture Other Community, Social and Personal Service Activities (OHQN) = 0.882191 unit per quarterly has minimum score is production externally section agriculture Financial Intermediation (FIQN) = 0.135302 unit.
4. Exchange rate (ER) has affect cause coefficient between 0.110435-0.934375 unit per quarterly maximum score is production externally section agriculture Mining and Quarrying (MAQN) = 0.934375 unit per quarterly has minimum score is production externally section Electricity, Gas and Water Supply (EQN) = 0.110435 unit.
Article Details
Academic articles, research articles, and book reviews in the Ph.D. in Social Sciences Journal are author’s opinions, and not the publisher’s, and is not the responsibility of the Ph.D. in Social Sciences Journal Philosophy Association, Ramkhamhaeng University. (In the case that research is done on human, the researcher has to be trained in Ethics for Doing Research on Human Training and has to produce the evidence of the training).
References
Mountford, A., & Uhlig, H. (2005). What are the effects of fiscal policy shocks. SFB649 discussion paper 2005-039. Berlin: Humboldt University.
Pereira, A. M., & Andraz, J. M. (2003). On the impact of public investment on the performance of U.S. industries. Public Finance Review, 31(1), 66-90.
Perotti, R. (2001). What do we know about the effects of fiscal policy?. In M. Bordignon & D. Da Empoli (Eds.), Politico fiscale, flessibilita dei mercati e crescita. Milano, Italy: Angeli.
Samuelson, P. A., & Nordhaus, W. D. (2002). Economics (17th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.