Capability Innovation Management for the Sustainable Organization Performance of the Agricultural Industry in Thailand
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research article aim to study Capability Innovation Management approaches that affect the Sustainable Organization Performance of the Agricultural Industry in Thailand. Using qualitative research, , the contributor is the chief executive of the agricultural industry. 5 persons, set the selection criteria. Use specific selection, tools such as in-depth interviews and non-engaging observations, together with studying data from documents. Data collection and data analysis with content analysis methods.
The results showed that the Agricultural Industry in Thailand has the ability to Capability Innovation Management for Sustainable Organizations (1) The Dynamic human capital development potential has been developed by creating a creative atmosphere for employees to dare to think, enhancing their skills (2) Change Management Base on Diversity, using technology using computers. In the production of machine parts design production control (3) Potential for Creating Creative Business Alliances, flexibility in cooperation with the resources of the business by collaborating in the development of production processes. (4) Capability Innovation Management through the use of digital technology to manage data for forecasting planning creative concept design (5) The Value-Co-Creation base on Competitive Excellence by encouraging the sharing of information (6) Sustainable Organization Performance in the form of profitability.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Academic articles, research articles, and book reviews in the Ph.D. in Social Sciences Journal are author’s opinions, and not the publisher’s, and is not the responsibility of the Ph.D. in Social Sciences Journal Philosophy Association, Ramkhamhaeng University. (In the case that research is done on human, the researcher has to be trained in Ethics for Doing Research on Human Training and has to produce the evidence of the training).
References
Anthony, R. N., & Govindarajan, V. (2007). Management control systems (12th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Byun, J., Sung, T.-E., & Park, H.-W. (2018). A network analysis of strategic alliance drivers in ICT open ecosystem: With focus on mobile, cloud computing, and multimedia. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 77(12), 14725-14744.
Chantavanich, S. (2013). Qualitative research methods (21st ed.). Chulalongkorn University Press. [In Thai]
Craciun, E. (2015). Human capital – A quality factor for the competitiveness of IT companies. Manager Journal, 21(1), 44-51.
Crook, T. R., Todd, S. Y., Combs, J. G., Woehr, D. J., & Ketchen, D. J., Jr. (2011). Does human capital matter?: A meta-analysis of the relationship between human capital and firm performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(3), 443-456.
Daniela, P. A. (2014). Competitive advantage in the enterprise performance. Annals of the University of Oradea, Economic Science Series, 23(1), 524-531.
Freeman, R. E., & Velamuri, S. R. (2006). A new approach to CSR: Company stakeholder responsibility. in A. Kakabadse & M. Morsing (Eds.), Corporate social responsibility: reconciling aspiration with application (pp. 9-23). Palgrave Macmillan.
Gomes, G., & Wojahn, R. M. (2017). Organizational learning capability, innovation and performance: Study in Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs). Revista de Administração, 52(2), 163-175.
Greer, C. R., Lusch, R. F., & Vargo, S. L. (2015). A service perspective: Key managerial insights from Service-Dominant (S-D) logic. Organizational Dynamics, 45(1), 28-38.
Hazell, P., & Wood, S. (2008). Drivers of change in global agriculture. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 363(1491), 495-515.
Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and time (J. Macquarrie & E. Robinson, Trans.). Blackwell.
Jammeh, A. (2018). Organizational innovations that stick: Best practices in sustainable organizational change. Doctoral Dissertation of Business Administration, University of South Florida.
Jones, G. R. (2004). Organizational theory, design, and change (5th ed.). Pearson.
Kennedy, C. (2018). Innovation adoption: Adopting change management techniques to positively impact new product diffusion. Master Thesis of Science (Engineering Management), University of Minnesota.
Kotler, P., & Armstrong, G. (2014). Principle of marketing (15th ed.). Pearson.
Lawson, B., & Samson, D. (2011). Developing innovation capability in organizations: A dynamic capabilities approach. International Journal of Innovation Management, 5(3), 377-400.
Leskovar-Spacapan, G., & Bastic, M. (2007). Differences in organizations’ innovation capability in transition economy: Internal aspect of the organizations’ strategic orientation. Technovation, 27(9), 533-546.
Mehta, C., & Gupta, P. (2014). Sculpting future leaders: An intrapreneurial approach. Global Journal of Finance and Management, 6(4), 313-320.
Ministry of Industry, The office of Industrial Economic. (2017). Development plan Industry potential, fiscal year 2017. Retrieved from http://reg3.diw.go.th/policy/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/DOWNLOAD-1.pdf [In Thai]
Office of the National Economic and Social Development Council. (2017). Summary of draft the twelfth national economic and social development plan (2017-2021). Retrieved from https://www.nesdc.go.th/ewt_w3c/ewt_dl_link.php?nid=9517 [In Thai]
Olson, E. M., Slater, S. F., Hult, G. T. M., & Olson, K. M. (2018). The application of human resource management policies within the marketing organization: The impact on business and marketing strategy implementation. Industrial Marketing Management, 69(2), 62-73.
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2022). OECD-FAO agricultural outlook 2022-2031. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/publications/oecd-fao-agricultural-outlook-19991142.htm
Podhisita, C. (2013). Science and art qualitative research (6th ed.). Amarin Printing. [In Thai]
Protogerou, A., Caloghirou, Y., & Lioukas, S. (2012). Dynamic capabilities and their indirect impact on firm performance. Industrial and Corporate Change, 21(3), 615-647.
Putri, F., & Aprilia, M. P. (2018). Dynamic capabilities strategy for sustainability development in print media management. Retrieved from https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2018/49/e3sconf_icsolca2018_08013.pdf
Santos, J. B., & Brito, L. A. L. (2012). Toward a subjective measurement model for firm performance. Brazilian Administration Review, 9(6), 95-117.
Shu, C., Zhou, K. Z., Xiao, Y., & Gao, S. (2016). How green management influences product innovation in China: The role of institutional benefits. Journal of Business Ethics, 133(3), 471-485.
Takahashi, A. R. W., Bulgacov, S., Semprebon, E., & Giacomini, M. M. (2017). Dynamic capabilities, marketing capability and organizational performance. Brazilian Business Review, 14(5), 466-478.
Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004). Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68(1), 1-17.
Wandebori, H., Steenhuis, H. J., & Groen, A. J. (2018). Exploring stakeholders’ support in international equity placement strategic alliance. Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business, 20(2), 205-228.
Zhou, K. Z., & Li, C. B. (2010). How strategic orientations influence the building of dynamic capability in emerging economies. Journal of Business Research, 63(3), 224-231.