An Analysis of Grammatical Errors Made by Thai EFL University Students in an EAP writing Class: Issues and Recommendations
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Grammatical errors are major concerns for many teachers and students. The first step in tackling these errors is to investigate what kinds of grammatical errors students make and how frequently they occur so that remedies can be sought. This study thus set out to analyze the essays written by Thai EFL students. The data used for analysis were 58 essays (24,445 words) produced by 29 second-year students enrolled in an EAP writing class at a public university in Thailand. Through the analysis, 1,199 errors were found. The errors were classified into ten types, and errors on nouns, articles, verbs, word classes, and prepositions were the most frequently found errors, constituting 84.07% of all the errors identified. This study also further divided the ten types of errors into 49 subtypes. This thorough and in-depth error classification revealed that wrong use of singular and plural nouns, omission of the article ‘the’, and subject-verb disagreements were the most prevalent grammatical errors committed by the Thai EFL students in this study. Alarmingly, the results showed that Thai EFL students still struggle with grammatical accuracy when they write. Although these grammatical errors may not completely obscure the meanings of students’ writing, the worrying point is their presence or prevalence can significantly undermine its quality and prevent it from reaching publishable quality. To address this issue, more attempts need to be made on the part of Thai EFL teachers. Therefore, this paper also provides recommendations for how to assist students in fixing these
commonly made grammatical errors.
Article Details
References
Amiri, F., & Puteh, M. (2017). Error analysis in academic writing: A case of international postgraduate students in Malaysia. Advances in Language and Literacy Studies, 8(4), 141-145.
Atmaca, C. (2016). Error analysis of Turkish EFL learners: A case study. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 232, 234-241.
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Essex, England: Pearson Education Limited.
Boonyarattanasoontorn, P. (2017). An investigation of Thai students’ English language writing difficulties and their use of writing strategies. Journal of Advanced Research in Social Sciences and Humanities, 2(2), 111-118.
Brown, H. D. (2000). Principles of language learning and teaching. (4th ed). White Plains, NY: Pearson Education.
Brown, H. D. (2007). Principles of language learning and teaching. (5th ed). White Plains, NY: Pearson Education.
Burns, A, & and Siegel, J. (Eds). (2018). International Perspectives on Teaching the Four Skills in ELT: Listening, Speaking, Reading, Writing. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
Byrd, P., & Benson, B. (1994). Problem/solution: A reference for ESL writers. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.
Carter, R., & McCarthy, M. (2006). Cambridge grammar of English: A comprehensive guide: Spoken and written English grammar usage. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Corder, S. P. (1974). The significance of learners’ errors. In J. C. Richards (Ed.), Error analysis: Perspectives on second language acquisition (pp. 19-27). London, England: Longman.
Corder, S. P. (1981). Error analysis and interlanguage. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Dulay, H., Burt, M., & Krashen, S. (1982). Language two. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Freeman, D. L., & Long, M. H. (1991). An introduction to second language acquisition research. New York, NY: Longman.
Gass, S. M., Behney, J., & Plonsky, L. (2013). Second language acquisition: An introductory course. (4th ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
IELTS. (n.d.). Test taker performance 2018. Retrieved August 3, 2020 from https://www.ielts.org/research/testtaker-performance
Iwasaki, S. & Ingkaphirom, P. (2009). A reference grammar of Thai. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
James, C. (1998). Errors in language learning and use. London, England: Longman.
Khatter, S. (2019). An analysis of the most common essay writing errors among EFL Saudi female learners (Majmaah University). Arab World English Journal, 10(3), 364-381.
Nguyen, T. T. L. (2018). The effect of combined peer-teacher feedback on Thai students’ writing accuracy. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 6(2), 117-132.
Norrish, J. (1983). Language learners and their errors. Hong Kong: Macmillan Press.
Nuruzzaman, M., Islam, A. S., & Shuchi, I. J. (2018). An analysis of errors committed by Saudi non-English major students in the English paragraph writing: A study of comparisons. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 9(1), 31-39.
Phoocharoensil, S., Moore, B., Gampper, C., Geerson, E. B., Chaturongakul, P., Sutharoj, S., & Carlon, W. T. (2016). Grammatical and lexical errors in low-proficiency Thai graduate students’ writing. Language Education and Acquisition Research Network (LEARN) Journal, 9(1), 11-24.
Pongsukvajchakul, P. (2019). Error analysis in English paragraph writings of Thai university students. Udon Thani Rajabhat University Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 8(2), 141-155.
Promsupa, P. (2016). An analysis of grammatical errors in English writing of Thai university students [Master’s thesis, Burapha University]. http://digital_collect.lib.buu.ac.th/dcms/files/55921176.pdf
Rattanadilok Na Phuket, P. & Bidin, S. J. (2016). Native language interference in writing: A case study of Thai EFL learners. International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching & Research, 4(16), 25-36.
Richards, J. C. (1974). A non-contrastive approach to error analysis. In J. C. Richards (Ed.), Error analysis: Perspectives on second language acquisition (pp. 172-188). London, England: Longman.
Richards, J. C., & Sampson, G. P. (1974). The study of learner English. In J. C. Richards (Ed.), Error analysis: Perspectives on second language acquisition (pp. 3-18). London, England: Longman.
Seyitkuliyev, D., Keyuravong, S., & Bunsom, T. (2020). Investigation of grammatical errors committed by Turkmen learners of English. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences University of Phayao, 8(1), 96-117.
Sermsook, K., Liamnimitr, J., & Pochakorn, R. (2017). An analysis of errors in written English sentences: A case study of Thai EFL students. English Language Teaching, 10(3), 101-110.
Suvarnamani, S. (2017). A study of grammatical and lexical errors in descriptive writing of first year arts students at Silapakorn University. Silapakorn University Journal of Social Sciences, Humanities, and Arts, 17(2), 239-264.
Swan, M. (2005). Practical English usage. (3rd ed.). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Tan, K. E., & Manochphinyo, A. (2017). Improving grammatical accuracy in Thai learners’ writing: Comparing direct and indirect written corrective feedback. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 14(3), 430-442.
Waelateh, B., Boonsuk, Y., Ambele, E. A., & Jeharsae, F. (2019). An analysis of the written errors of Thai EFL students’ essay writing in English. Songklanakarin Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 25(3), 55-82.
Zheng, C. & Park, T. (2013). An analysis of errors in English writing made by Chinese and Korean university students. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3(8), 1342-1351.