Structure of Feeling and Political Violence: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis in the Global Context

Main Article Content

Nadhakorn Sutirat
Wittayatorn Torkaew
Kawit Srisamrit

Abstract

This academic article has three main objectives: 1) to analyze the concept of "Structure of Feeling" and political emotions that influence the perception of power, justice, and violence, 2) to analyze the relationship between emotion and political violence in the global context and the Thai context, and 3) to propose guidelines for reducing political violence through communicative management of the structure of feeling. The article employs a qualitative analysis, utilizing Raymond Williams' framework of the Structure of Feeling to explain political emotion as an uncodified cultural structure. It also draws on Sara Ahmed's "Politics of Emotion," which views emotion as a mechanism of power mobilized through discourse, and James Jasper's framework on emotional mechanisms in social movements, which identifies emotion as a key driver for mobilization and political resistance. Preliminary findings indicate that emotions such as anger, fear, and hope are not merely individual reactions but are constructed and transmitted as a structure of feeling that guides political action, leading to violence or peaceful resistance. Therefore, this article emphasizes the importance of communicative management to shift the structure of feeling that underlies political violence.

Article Details

How to Cite
Sutirat, N., Torkaew, W., & Srisamrit, K. (2025). Structure of Feeling and Political Violence: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis in the Global Context. RMUTP Research Journal Humanities and Social Sciences, 10(2), 86–101. retrieved from https://so05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/rmutphuso/article/view/280870
Section
Academic Articles

References

กองทุนเพื่อความเสมอภาคทางการศึกษา (EEF). (2567). รายงานประจำปี 2567. สืบค้นจาก https://www.eef.or.th/

เกษียร เตชะพีระ. (2564). โครงสร้างของความรุนแรงเชิงอำนาจ [บทความคอลัมน์]. มติชนสุดสัปดาห์. สืบค้นจาก https://www.matichonweekly.com/

ชัยวัฒน์ สถาอานันท์. (2556). การสื่อสารอย่างไม่ใช้ความรุนแรง. วารสารสันติวิธีและการจัดการความขัดแย้ง, 1(1), 1–15.

ณธกร สุทธิรัตน์, วิทยาธร ท่อแก้ว, และกวิทธิ์ ศรีสัมฤทธิ์. (2568). การสื่อสารความรุนแรงทางการเมืองบนโซเชียลมีเดีย: ความท้าทาย กรอบทฤษฎี และแนวทางการกำกับดูแล. วารสารนิเทศศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยสุโขทัยธรรมาธิราช, 15(1), 17–37. https://so02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JOCASTOU/article/view/278982

สำนักงานสภาพัฒนาการเศรษฐกิจและสังคมแห่งชาติ. (2566). รายงานสภาวะเศรษฐกิจและสังคมไทย ประจำปี 2566. สืบค้นจาก https://www.nesdc.go.th/

Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. Doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x

European Commission. (2018). Action plan against disinformation [Policy report]. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52018DC0795

European Parliament. (2022). Digital Services Act [Legislative document]. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32022R2065

Freelon, D., McIlwain, C. D., & Clark, M. D. (2016). Beyond the hashtags: Ferguson, #BlackLivesMatter, and the online struggle for offline justice [Research report]. Center for Media & Social Impact. Retrieved from https://cmsimpact.org/report/beyond-the-hashtags

Gerges, F. (2014). The new Middle East: Protest and revolution in the Arab world. Cambridge University Press.

Goodwin, J., Jasper, J. M., & Polletta, F. (2001). Passionate politics: Emotions and social movements. University of Chicago Press.

Gould, D. B. (2009). Moving politics: Emotion and ACT UP’s fight against AIDS. University of Chicago Press.

Gurr, T. R. (1970). Why men rebel. Princeton University Press.

Hochschild, A. R. (2016). Strangers in their own land: Anger and mourning on the American right. New Press.

Iyengar, S., Sood, G., & Lelkes, Y. (2019). Affect, not ideology: A social identity perspective on polarization. Annual Review of Political Science, 22, 129–146. Doi: 10.1146/annurev-polisci-051117-073034

Jasper, J. M. (2011). Emotions and social movements: Twenty years of theory and research. Annual Review of Sociology, 37, 285–303. Doi: 10.1146/annurev-soc-081309-150015

Massumi, B. (2015). The politics of affect. Polity Press.

McAdam, D. (2017). Social movements and social change: The changing nature of the field. Social Movement Studies, 16(4), 427–443. Doi: 10.1080/14742837.2017.1331121

McCargo, D. (2021). Thailand’s protest movements in comparative perspective. Critical Asian Studies, 53(4), 523–545. Doi: 10.1080/14672715.2021.1932732

Petersen, R. D. (2002). Understanding ethnic violence: Fear, hatred, and resentment in twentieth-century Eastern Europe. Cambridge University Press.

Tarrow, S. (2011). Power in movement: Social movements and contentious politics (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press. Doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139176136

Tilly, C. (2003). The politics of collective violence. Cambridge University Press.

United Nations. (2020). UN peacebuilding report: Building hope and reconciliation. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/

Williams, R. (1977). Marxism and literature. Oxford University Press.

Wodak, R. (2015). The politics of fear: What right-wing populist discourses mean. Sage.

World Bank. (2023). World development report 2023: Governance and accountability. Doi: 10.1596/978-1-4648-1984-1